| ▲ | dataviz1000 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When I was working in the heart of conservative online media in West Palm Beach—nestled between Rush Limbaugh’s studio, Mar-a-Lago, and Newsmax—targeting Evangelical Christians in the Bible Belt, my salary (and the direction things eventually went) was being paid for by the Saudis. At the time, the propaganda was mostly “pro-oil” and “climate change is a hoax.” Around that same period, those same Saudis bought a 10% stake in Fox News and helped shape the narrative for millions of Christians who tune in and treat it like their main source of news. So yeah, if you were ever curious where the profits go every time you fill up your car with gas… there. I thought I was just building media websites. I didn’t even see the content until after six months. I put in my one month notice, finished what I was working on, and left. The amount of money they offered me to stay was ridiculous. I don’t blame people at Fox News for bending the knee and taking that Saudi money -- I just couldn’t make myself do it. “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” A lot of people are going to spend eternity in hell for propaganda and lies. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | somenameforme 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saudis are invested in a huge range of things in America. It has historical roots in the petrodollar. The basic deal of it that that they would only sell their oil in USD, which gave the USD a de facto backing after we defaulted in Bretton Woods (which was a de jure gold backing). That gave the USD a huge chunk of stability and in exchange we agreed to sell them weapons and broadly support them, while in exchange they were also asked to purchase US treasuries and assets with surplus revenues. Over time this led to Saudis being involved in just about everything. For instance the biggest owner of 'old Twitter' under Dorsey was Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud. Needless to say the zeitgeist on old Twitter and Saudi Arabia have basically nothing in common, so you're probably seeing ideological motivation where the real motivation is generally just monetary. Not every country is conspiring to subvert other countries to their ideology. Basically Saudia Arabia is filthy rich because of oil, but they fully understand that even if we continue burning oil until we run out, we will run out, within the lifetime of some people living today. So they have to migrate their economy away from oil and, on the timeline for such a revolutionary shift, they have very little time left. This is likely what MBS sees as what will define his legacy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rsanek 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Looks like Prince Alwaleed bin Talal's ownership of Fox was between 5.5% to 7% during the two-decade period of 1997 ~ 2017. He divested during an anti-corruption purge. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cujo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I don’t blame people at Fox News for bending the knee and taking that Saudi money i do, and i judge people who take money to push harmful things. i don't see why this is bad. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pavlov 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
They hate Muslims, but they love money and theocracy more, and Saudis are top of the world in both. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gsky 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No wonder Terrorism is supported by oil money. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hgomersall 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What level of moral compromise is acceptable in this world to take whatever money is offered? Presumably the job of hitman is unacceptable? Where's the line drawn? Personally I'd say that lying to perpetuate a system that is leading to various populous parts of the world becoming uninhabitable is on the wrong side of that line. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||