| ▲ | cm2012 3 days ago |
| Trying to sit still for 30 min without any stimulation at all (no talking, watching, reading) sounds like torture to me. |
|
| ▲ | Tagbert 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| It can be at first until you get used to it. You can observe your surroundings, make up stories about what is happening. Ask yourself questions. Listen to yourself. This is a bit like excercise. When you first start, 30 minutes of exercise can be torture as your is out of shape and not used to the effort. Keep doing it and it feels better and you feel better. Work on becoming a source of thoughts rather than a consumer of thoughts. |
| |
| ▲ | exe34 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > You can observe your surroundings, make up stories about what is happening. I had to sit still a lot as a child, since I wasn't allowed to have friends or go anywhere. I read a lot, but a lot of the time I was to tired or bored to read, so I'd just defocus my eyes, and disappear into my imagination. It would look like I'm reading, so I wouldn't get punished. In hindsight I'm not sure it's terribly healthy, as I now find it impossible to put up with boring people (which is basically everybody who has time to sit around chatting, almost by definition). | | |
| ▲ | robocat 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > I now find it impossible to put up with boring people (which is basically everybody who has time to sit around chatting, almost by definition). You're being judgemental to call them boring. Plus widening your opinions to be a "definition" sounds like an unhealthy worldview. You likely appear boring to others. Then again I have a saying I use when anyone says they are bored - I say they are boring! | | |
| ▲ | exe34 3 days ago | parent [-] | | > Then again I have a saying I use when anyone says they are bored - I say they are boring! This is a very clever come back, I wonder if it might qualify as the best thought terminating cliché I've seen this year! I never say I'm bored. The universe is too interesting a place to be bored. I did mean it, that most people, individually, are what I find boring. I'd rather withdraw into my mind and work on something interesting, whether it's about figuring something out, or trying to design something. The painful part is pretending to care long enough to get away without somebody getting butthurt. The "almost by definition" is that the people I find interesting are usually busy doing interesting things, so the boring ones are the only regular people at social gatherings. I do not go to those anymore. | | |
| ▲ | robocat 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > I wonder if it might qualify as the best thought terminating cliché I've seen this year! That is certainly the best back-handed compliment I have received in the last hour. Thank you. Your writing molests me. > is that the people I find interesting are usually busy doing interesting things, so the boring ones are the only regular people at social gatherings. That comes across to me as a refreshingly honest self-centred view. You recall me of a friend who does contemporary dance as part of a troupe. I find them interesting - however I also find sewage plants and stink beetles interesting. What's I'm trying to say is that finding people interesting (or boring) probably says more about you than it does about them. The smartest people I know seem to be interested in everything. I often find people interesting for reasons I would find difficult to admit to them. I'm not that smart. I find myself boring - contemptuous through familiarity? And yeah, I'm rather cynical about "norms" too. | |
| ▲ | throwaway202601 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I'd rather withdraw into my mind and work on something interesting Be careful that there are social penalties for behaving like that way. When people smell an air of arrogance, they implicitly punish you. I recommend to trick yourself into believing that people around you are worth your time. Even if it's not really true. Even if it makes you die a little inside. Just try to make it work. And when the opportunity comes to get rid of those people from your life, grab that chance with all your heart. | | |
| ▲ | exe34 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > they implicitly punish you they can't punish me if I'm not there and don't depend on them. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | nlh 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’m just curious about the “wasn’t allowed to have friends or go anywhere” part. Can you elaborate? Why not? Is this some form/culture of parenting I’m not familiar with? This idea of not allowing a child to have friends or go anywhere just sounds like actual emotional abuse. | | |
| ▲ | exe34 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > just sounds like actual emotional abuse. it was. my father assured everybody that he and I were best friends and I didn't need anybody else. I was allowed to go to school, that was it. | | |
| ▲ | nlh 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Gotcha. Thanks for sharing, and I'm truly sorry you had to deal with that :( |
|
| |
| ▲ | vlod 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I have a feeling I had a similar childhood to you (strict/smothering). I also find it problematical to deal with people who live 'normal/standard' lives who are not curious about the world and how everything works. Being put in a conversation talking about sports, gossip, celebrities is intolerable for me. I've come to accept (and I think some people here may resonate with) that this is can be a blessing or good filtering mechanism. |
| |
| ▲ | bradlys 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | People talk about this with exercise and I’ve never understood it. As someone who has exercised continuously for years - it has never gotten better. Which, to me, makes sense because you’re supposed to always be pushing yourself. You’re not supposed to ever feel comfortable or feel better from it. You should always feel shitty because if it doesn’t hurt then you’re probably not making optimal development. The only thing I ever “feel” good about is purely a mental thing. Eg I hit a new PR (progress), didn’t skip a lift (perseverance), or whatever. The act of exercising itself is always painful and it’s why I always dread it. | | |
| ▲ | seba_dos1 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Wanting to "make optimal development" is just one of possible motivations for exercising and not everyone who does it is interested in that. Maintaining good health and generally wanting to feel better across the day are also perfectly valid reasons to exercise. | |
| ▲ | dwaltrip 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You gotta give yourself a bit more slack. We all deserve to rest and go slow now and then. What's the point of living if you can't take a break? We are chaotic and beautiful bundles of dozens of trillions of cells that evolved over 4 billion years. We breath. We feel. We are alive. We aren't math problems that need to be "solved" or "optimized". > Which, to me, makes sense because you’re supposed to always be pushing yourself. You’re not supposed to ever feel comfortable or feel better from it. You should always feel shitty because if it doesn’t hurt then you’re probably not making optimal development. You are way too demanding of yourself my friend :( | |
| ▲ | cpsempek 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > if it doesn't hurt then you're not making optimal development this is almost certainly wrong - 100% balls to wall training will surely be suboptimal (on avg) to achieving most fitness goals - eg within a running training block there will generally be recovery and "general aerobic" runs which are easy in effort relative to the harder work in the block. These easy efforts are necessary to optimally achieve the desired physiological adaptations acquired through increased volume and "nailing" the hard workouts. The easier runs enable this by getting volume at lower risk of injury + conserving energy/will for the key workouts. This also doesn't consider how important recovery is to optimal results (as in sleep, rest, self-care etc). | |
| ▲ | tmn 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Exercising is doing some activity that is good for your health. You’ve reduced this to some narrow set of activities that presumably make you stronger, faster, or better at some other easy to measure metric. I assure you it’s easy to enjoy exercising if your incentive is longevity and simply healthy living by a more subjective metric | |
| ▲ | joevandyk 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I finally started getting stronger in the gym when I stopped going to failure on everything. I got in the best endurance shape by going on a steady comfortable pace for progressively longer periods of time. Harder is not always better. | | |
| ▲ | matwood 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | One of my favorite styles of weight training is volume based. The premise starts with something like I need 10 reps of a certain weight, but it doesn't matter how many sets it takes to get there. Each set ends if I cannot do another perfect rep. If I can't do a single perfect rep, then the exercise ends and I move on to the next thing. By requiring the rep to be perfect, it naturally keeps you from going to failure and lowers chance of injury. There's more to it like how to pick the weight, etc... but the perfect rep piece I really enjoyed. | |
| ▲ | j45 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I noticed the same. Also late to the party, but creatine is the body and more importantly the brains friend too. |
| |
| ▲ | svpk 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd point out that at least in aerobic exercies (ie running and biking) its generally recommended that you shouldn't be pushing too hard for most of your workouts. If you're going out four days a week it's only on one or two of them that you're generally supposed to push yourself. The others should be at an easier pace. Which I tend to find more enjoyable. There's also something to be said for seasons of maintaining a level of fitness rather than pushing for the next level! https://stories.strava.com/articles/a-productive-weekly-trai... | |
| ▲ | senbrow 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It seems very likely to me that the sensations experienced during exercise are highly variable among individuals. I say this because my experience is very different from yours: I get a very perceptible "high" once I get into the rhythm of a good workout. Think mild euphoria, mood lift, and general feeling of "rightness" in my body once it's been well wrung. This only happens if I'm in decent shape, though. If I've fallen out of shape it's a slog. Edit: I can't remember the podcast, but I recall some discussion of emerging clinical evidence in exercise response variability along many dimensions that may help explain the disconnect. | | |
| ▲ | socalgal2 3 days ago | parent [-] | | A friend told me he was addicted to running because he literally got high from it. I said, running hurt for me. He said it used to for him too. I asked how long until it stopped hurting. He said 2 YEARS!!!! There's no way I'm going to run for 2 years on the hope that one day it will stop hurting and get enjoyable. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I've done weight training for about 5 years now. It's not fun. I definitely get no "high" from it. But I do like the results. |
|
| |
| ▲ | matwood 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I love working out and have for over 25 years. You should never be in real pain or feel 'shitty'. It should be challenging of course and part of that challenge is being uncomfortable. Learning to embrace being uncomfortable, IMO, is one of the super powers of being a person that translate to all other areas of life. Once a person learns to embrace uncomfortable moments, everything else just becomes...easier. | |
| ▲ | andrewinardeer 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Exercise can become a form of self harm. It did for me. | |
| ▲ | melagonster 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | But you have ability to suffer painful for a long time. | | |
| ▲ | bradlys 3 days ago | parent [-] | | If you think that’s ability then you should see what my whole life has been. Pain from exercise is a joke in comparison. |
|
| |
| ▲ | johnisgood 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I end up being consumed by depressive thoughts and lots of body scanning. I hate it. | | |
| ▲ | RussianCow 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Maybe your exercise can be to direct your thoughts elsewhere. Start with 5 minutes instead of 30 and actively try to think about something else when your thoughts become too negative. I can't guarantee it will help you but it's a sort of meditation that's worked for me when I felt like my brain wouldn't turn off. | |
| ▲ | dwaltrip 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sounds like your body is telling you something? Time to find support that you trust and face whatever is going on under the hood. For me, the three major turning points were quitting my job, later starting somatic therapy with the right therapist, and then finally getting diagnosed with ADHD. Good luck to you :) wish you the best | | |
| ▲ | johnisgood 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Well, I have MS and I have muscle spasticity, spinal hyperactivity, etc. The feeling of not having control over your body is terrible. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | ugjjhgvjb 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | So… stimulate yourself? > Work on becoming a source of thoughts rather than a consumer of thoughts. This is the classic “sounds deep but actually means nothing” vague statement that’s only meant to massage one’s ego and try to reenforce an unsubstantiated idea in a faux-philosophical way. You are always “sourcing” thoughts even when “consuming”. Being able to sit still, quietly without having to stimulate oneself is, by all means, exactly that: avoid stimulating oneself. Looking around and trying to come up with small stimulations based on your surrounding is merely replacing one object (say, your phone) with another. | | |
| ▲ | bovermyer 3 days ago | parent [-] | | In order to avoid all stimulation, there is but one recourse, and it is rather final. Generally, I prefer just sitting quietly and not worrying about the definition of stimulation or whether I'm doing it correctly. | | |
| ▲ | fragmede 3 days ago | parent [-] | | A session in a sensory deprivation tank isn't final so I'd recommend that over some other solution that is final. | | |
| ▲ | bovermyer 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Ah, but that isn't complete lack of stimulation. It's just minimization of external stimulation! That said, I agree with you. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | 2ap 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Part of my job, is that I design protocols to help young children lie in MRI scanners for a living. We have all sorts of techniques to help with this. However, for each new scanning protocol, I like to have had it myself - so I know what the children go through. And, at times lying inside a MRI scanner, detached from the world, with only the noise of the scanner (very reduced with our new noise cancelling headphones), is almost meditative, and a welcome escape from the constant connection and pressures of being immediately available at work. Sounds like the writer achieves something similar in the coffee shop. |
| |
| ▲ | hliyan 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This reminds me: I experience a similar "welcome escape" sensation when I'm hospitalized. My work responsibilities are manifold and tend to intrude into my thoughts even when I'm at leisure. But when I'm in the hospital, there seem to be some sort of physical and psychological clean break. Hard to describe. | | |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That's basically a vacation, or what it should be. I feel sorry for US people who, at best, get two weeks of paid time off a year, which they'll often need to use up throughout the year for other reasons. Everyone should be able to take a two week uninterrupted break at least once a year, ideally more often than that (two weeks around the holiday season, two weeks in summer, another week at another point, a long weekend on occasion, etc). | |
| ▲ | cm2012 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, it makes me not feel guilty for not thinking about work. I love being super sick lol. |
| |
| ▲ | BrenBarn 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was a subject in an fMRI study when I was in college and I found the experience quite tranquil (although this was before smartphones). The hum of the machine was kind of calming. I felt I probably would have fallen asleep if not for the sense of responsibility required to pay attention to the task. | |
| ▲ | normie3000 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I absolutely love going in the machine. Highly meditative and usually I fall asleep by the end. You can get the soundtrack on YouTube too, but it's not quite the same. What works to get children to stay still though? | | |
| ▲ | 2ap 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Ah, depends on the child! But for kids over 8, a nice long form video works well. That, and having enough time so that they don't feel like we're in a rush, but also not taking to long to load them onto the scanner... For the younger ones, it's very much dependent on the child. So we take a bit of time to get to know them before we get them to attend. We have videos to prep them, and can follow a script when loading them (e.g. becoming an astronaut and blasting off into space...). |
| |
| ▲ | 0_____0 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Doing something where you get to say "bugger everything" and just do what you're doing for a while is amazing. It's one of the things I actually like about the (otherwise not very relaxing) ultra-distance racing. 2-6 days of just riding your bike, eating, sleeping outside. Yeah it can be hard but nothing makes the MS Teams chime in the woods. | | |
| ▲ | BoxOfRain 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Part of why I like sailing is for a similar reason, beyond a certain range the only people who can bother you electronically are other people at sea (and you actually want to listen to them). |
| |
| ▲ | NGRhodes 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I had a very different experience with my last MRI. I had brain slices (temporal lobe Epilepsy) and my head buzzed/vibrated and could not relax. | |
| ▲ | jddj 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Fascinating. How many MRIs have you had? I get a break from constant availability from air travel, but that's slowly eroding as it becomes more connected. | | |
| ▲ | 2ap 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I'm not sure I know (but the database keeps a record - I'll have to look it up!). A couple a year for sure a few years. Yes, my last transatlantic flight I caught up with a stack of email. | | |
| ▲ | matwood 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I get so much work done on flights because I can't take meetings. |
|
| |
| ▲ | johnisgood 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | What keeps me from going claustrophobic inside an MRI is the sound. It is very loud, yes, but at least I have that to focus on. |
|
|
| ▲ | tzone 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think it depends on what counts as doing nothing. Every time I cut my hair, I sit in a chair for ~30minutes silently without doing anything. My barber knows I don't like small talk so he just cuts my hair and that's it, there is no conversation. I would say it is very enjoyable 30 minutes every time I do it. I don't think anyone would describe that kind of experience as hard to do? |
| |
| ▲ | chongli 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You're still being stimulated by the act of the barber cutting your hair. Sitting in a chair doing nothing alone in a silent room is a different story. | |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I don't think anyone would describe that kind of experience as hard to do? Some would, especially the younger generation. Their attention span - or probably their brain chemistry - is strongly affected by constant stimulation, to the point where disconnecting from it causes anxiety and restlessness. Not just the younger generation either, millennials are probably the first generation to be affected. | |
| ▲ | frutiger 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How long has your barber been cutting hair? | |
| ▲ | cm2012 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I enjoy the sensations at the barber very much. |
|
|
| ▲ | vlod 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone." - Blaise Pascal I try and think about this often. |
| |
| ▲ | cal_dent 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Me too. I heard this phrase at maybe too young and age and took it completely literally, so it clouds my judgement of it a bit, but I still cannot shake the view that it is 100% on the money. The brain wants to "solve" your issues, ideas, hang-ups, anxieties, ("solve" because sometimes having no solution is the solution and that is valid) it just needs us to give it the space to meander through it. But we keep finding more and more novel ways to interfere and stop it from doing that most noblest of things. As a related aside, that's why I continue to find it odd that many people take their phones when they're using the bathroom. Just further limiting the few places (with the shower being #1) where circumstances does force your brain to review and assess like it clearly wants to do. | |
| ▲ | randycupertino 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Reminds me of the trend of "raw dogging flights" - ie no book, no TV, no music, no headphones.
https://www.travelweek.ca/news/airlines/what-is-raw-dogging-... | | | |
| ▲ | anonymous908213 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think it's very much worth thinking about. It's a pseudointellectual quip that sounds superficially insightful but which holds zero substance. The overwhelming majority of humanity's problems, such as they might be described, stem from the biological drive to survive and procreate. The quip presupposes that man naturally has a room to sit quietly in; this is not the case. The procurement of a room to sit in requires a significant amount of effort. It can entail the securing of territory and building of the shelter oneself, or it can entail the education, advanced skill development, and daily labour required to pay to reap the results of other people having secured the territory and built the shelter. To say nothing of food, mating, and rearing of offspring. Pascal was born well-to-do, so perhaps he was removed from the general human experience. He was provided with the room to sit quietly in by the efforts of others, and may never have had to work a day in his life, affording him the luxury to make that statement. He also did not marry or reproduce. If everyone had lived the life he lived, there would be no rooms to sit in and indeed no men to sit in them. Being charitable, I suppose it's true that if all mankind were to stop reproducing, there would shortly be no more problems for humanity on account of humanity no longer existing. | | |
| ▲ | cal_dent 3 days ago | parent [-] | | just go to a park mate. an open field. an empty car park. everyone can find a place to sit or stop. no one has taken that away from you | | |
| ▲ | anonymous908213 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I guess I can see how I didn't communicate clearly, but that was really not the point I was getting at. The point about the room is more that ordinary people need to acquire shelter and food to survive. If those things are not freely provided for them as they were for Pascal, their life will have many problems in the pursuit of those things. Meditating quietly in nature is all well and good, but doing so will hardly free you from all the problems that are associated with the pursuit of survival and/or procreation, and which make up the majority of human problems. Pascal also stated... > as we should always be, in the suffering of evils, in the deprivation of all the goods and pleasures of the senses, free from all the passions that work throughout the course of life, without ambition, without avarice, in the continual expectation of death while going so far as rejecting medical care for an illness that eventually led to his death at a young 39. In other words, his attained enlightenment was suffering in the name of his religion to the point of dying. He certainly committed to his beliefs, but I don't find his form of enlightenment inspiring, and do not believe that humanity should strive to follow in his footsteps of fatal self-deprivation. The only way sitting quietly solves all of humanity's problems is if all of humanity commits to doing only that until they wither away and die without any pursuit of the things they need to survive. He framed it as giving up ambition and avarice, but even without ambition and avarice you will endure struggles merely to sustain yourself if you are not born into wealth. I, personally, am quite content dealing with those struggles and have no interest in solving them by dying prematurely as Pascal might prefer to do. | | |
| ▲ | cal_dent 3 days ago | parent [-] | | shelter and food is not freely provided for the majority and a non-insignificant proportion of people are managing I'd say. Yes, it's hyperbole, it literally will not get rid of all the problems but the ethos of the view is being conscious of your needs and your actions and you only truly get that by having the space to think. As opposed to just go go go and not taking a step back and implicitly treating your mind as a hostile place you need distraction from. I'll throw in another quote that sits nicely with the Pascal quote, from Ursula Le Guin: > Happiness is based on a just discrimination of what is necessary,
what is neither necessary nor destructive, and what is destructive just discrimination can only come from being comfortable to be with your thoughts, which can, but is not limited to, happen in a quiet room | | |
| ▲ | anonymous908213 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I think where we are not seeing eye-to-eye is our interpretation of his words. I don't take them to be hyperbole, given that he died practicing what he preached. He was an extreme ascetic who overcame his biological desires, including the very desire to survive. In one sense, that kind of mastery is an impressive feat. But I don't think that kind of mastery is beneficial to humanity or that people should strive to achieve the suppression of all their desires, including their will to survive. The second quote does not comport with Pascal, because Pascal was not advocating for a path that led to internal happiness, but rather the abandonment of the desire for happiness altogether. He believed that suffering on Earth was the purpose of being Christian and would lead to salvation through God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | unsungNovelty 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It is. I did somewhere around ~10mins or something in my first try. Which I was told is very high for a first attempt. But it is indeed difficult. Like @dymk said, you work your way up. Also, a lot of folks think it's easy to do. Until you try it, that is. I also remember reading somewhere around the lines of handling the chaos in your-self. Or controlling the chaos within yourself. And always thought this exercise showed what that is about. (Sorry, forgot the expression. Been a while. It's definitely more nicely put than the above.) |
|
| ▲ | FpUser 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >"Trying to sit still for 30 min without any stimulation at all (no talking, watching, reading) sounds like torture to me" I've done more than that. Summer time I often swim in open water up to 2 hour at once as one of the ways to stay fit. Obviously it becomes routine and not very entertaining. So I usually doing some high level software design work in my mind at this point, exploring some concepts, thinking business ideas etc. etc. So my body does monotonous work of not very high intensity and my brain is busy with everything else. Not board at all. I once spent 1.5 hour standing in a church listening to a priest for more than an hour (funeral). Same thing I mentally solved the problem why some piece of my code did not work. Without this ability I would go nuts. My brain always has to be busy with something. It is like a drug for me. |
| |
| ▲ | notdang 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Try ultra running for at least 10 hours. You run out of things to think about, plus you are so tired that you cannot concentrate for long on the same subject. After some struggle you will enter into a weird state that I think should be similar to what they achieve through meditation. | | |
| ▲ | FpUser 3 days ago | parent [-] | | >"Try ultra running for at least 10 hours" Not my cup of tea. But I do get your point. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | epistasis 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I felt that for much of my life. Time without stimulation was, if not scary, at least a bit panic inducing. Learning to sit without stimulation, without any distractions from my worries, led to being able to realize that "hey, I'm OK, I don't even need those worries." Which led to handling the underlying pressures and stresses MUCH better, without panic, without stress, with a full clear mind. I could apply my full intellect to things that before were hard to deal with. It felt like a super power when I first started practicing sitting. |
|
| ▲ | dymk 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It starts like that. Work up to 30 minutes, start with 5. The mind has an uncanny ability to entertain itself when it’s bored but paying attention. |
| |
| ▲ | doublerabbit 3 days ago | parent [-] | | You also find out how much noise your brain filters. You end up hearing conversations more clearly, environmental noises you wouldn't normally hear and I find more clarity for the environmental area. |
|
|
| ▲ | astura 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >Trying to sit still for 30 min without any stimulation at all (no talking, watching, reading) sounds like torture to me. Those of us over 40 have already had plenty of this in our lives, it used to be such a common part of life! Waiting for appointments, waiting for the bus, etc. before smartphones. My first job had two hours between lunch and dinner service. I only had about 15 minutes of work during that time, so it was hour plus of almost entirely idle time every shift. |
| |
| ▲ | cm2012 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Pre-smart phone era I would bring a book on the bus or sleep. |
|
|
| ▲ | hansmayer 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Then dont sit still for 30 mins - try doing it for 3 minutes at first. If you feel like it, repeat the next day with either the same or longer length. Or dont do it at all. If you do - think of it as a kind of a meditation, without the extra steps. Some isolation from sensory stimulation is good for your brain - there is growing evidence we are all over exposed to attention-robbing mechanisms of the digital world. |
|
| ▲ | anotherevan 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If nothing else, having to go to church every Sunday in my youth taught be to be able to sit still while bored off my brain for an hour a week. |
| |
| ▲ | cm2012 3 days ago | parent [-] | | My mom used to say I made her seasick since I would fidget and sway so much when bored in church. I'd also pretend to go to the bathroom just to leave the service to walk around. Memories unlocked! |
|
|
| ▲ | abustamam 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I thought it was too, but when my daughter was born she had trouble regulating her temperature so I had to stay with her while she was under the warmer for an hour, then another hour swaddled in my arms. They didn't allow phones, so I got to spend two hours with her, no distraction. The time passed surprisingly quickly. I sang to her, I told her stories from my head. Nowadays when I'm feeding her or napping her I admittedly do have a phone behind her head, but I'll always cherish those two hours where it was just us two. |
|
| ▲ | lifetimerubyist 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Some people just call this "meditation". |
| |
| ▲ | Tarq0n 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Not if you freely engage in rumination. Meditation is not just sitting with your thoughts. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | reg_dunlop 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My therapist used to say: this means you must do it for 40 minutes |
| |
| ▲ | patrickmay 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Meditate for 30 minutes every morning. If you don't have time, meditate for 60 minutes. | | | |
| ▲ | cm2012 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Id find that annoying and find a new therapist |
|
|
| ▲ | r721 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >People Prefer Electric Shocks to Being Alone With Their Thoughts https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/07/people-pr... |
|
| ▲ | beAbU 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Try rawdogging a train ride or short flight, and do nothing but take in the view. You might fool your body into accepting this state by actually doing something, but not really doing something. |
|
| ▲ | amanaplanacanal 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When I was younger I used to visit a local zendo, and I think the meditation sessions were 40 minutes. It's definitely an experience. Very easy to fall asleep without external distractions. The idea was to just learn to concentrate on bodily sensations, skin, breathing, sound. |
| |
| ▲ | cm2012 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I have tried sensory deprivation tanks a few times and always fall asleep within 5 min, like clockwork. |
|
|
| ▲ | yumraj 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sounds like meditation to me. |
| |
|
| ▲ | j45 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Solitude and once’s own company once learned is bliss. The mind finds entirely new areas of stimulation when it’s not being distracted or purely having sensory experiences. |
|
| ▲ | jdkee 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That is because the monkey mind is trying to create a narrative where none exists in the moment. |
|
| ▲ | mrmuagi 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Enduring boredom is the antithesis of mindless doomscrolling. |
|
| ▲ | blitzar 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Sounds like the morning standup for most people. |