Remix.run Logo
hwhehwhehegwggw 9 hours ago

I would take it one step up and say if you don't design your life intentionally your career will.

ramon156 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Juniors fall into this pitfall so quick. Our newest hire actually set boundaries early on and I was pleasantly surprised

georgeburdell 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Disagree. This kind of comment is furtively pulling up the ladder behind you. Do as I say not as I do. Junior is the time to learn as much as possible and take risky bets (and suffer accordingly). When I was in a junior in a factory, the night shift knew me well. Nowadays, I've pared it back to 50 or so hours per week, because I now have a family, which is fine but it came at the cost of basically zero time to learn or do things other than what my manager asks.

BeetleB an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> Junior is the time to learn as much as possible and take risky bets (and suffer accordingly). When I was in a junior in a factory, the night shift knew me well.

That would require a whole, separate article.

Many (most?) juniors grinding like that in a major company will work hard to get nowhere. Speaking from experience. Yes, I learned some lessons:

1. Get a different job. Deadend jobs definitely exist, and are quite common.

2. Ignore senior folks who say "You're whining. It's crappy everywhere. Just learn to take it."

Number 2 has been wrong every single time someone said it.

> Nowadays, I've pared it back to 50 or so hours per week, because I now have a family,

This is not the endorsement you think it is. I've done quite well by insisting on 40 hour weeks. I'm going to assume you're doing much better than I am, because otherwise it seems like a life wasted.

Don't get me wrong. If you want to go much farther than I have, you likely will have to grind and work hard and smart and be lucky. But I assure you - most of the people I know who worked hard are not in a better position than I am (or if they are, the difference is incremental).

raw_anon_1111 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You realize “pairing it back to 50 hours a week” is not a great outcome don’t you?

If I graduated post 2012 instead of 1996, I would have tied my horse to a safe BigTech company and made a lot of money in cash and liquid RSUs long before I joined a bullshit startup that statistically wouldn’t have gone anywhere.

Hell I made that choice at 46 when my youngest (step)son graduated. I chose to work at BigTech instead of getting a meaningless “CTO” founding engineer position at a startup.

kamaal 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is a correct view point to have.

As you get to the downswing of your career, you should have already worked and made enough mistakes to have most of your experience. You must cruise on that experience when you are older.

When you are old, that is not the time to work and make mistakes.

That is, most of the heavy work must be done as early as you can. Eat that frog.

nasmorn 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I agree. When new programmers come from uni they sometimes barely did any programming. So at some time in their life they got to actually put in the time and learn how to be a competent developer. It is obviously great if you can do it on somebody else dime in a 9 to 5 but if you can’t get that you should just put in the time and learn. In the end you can at best get paid for the value you can create and if you are incompetent that is not going to be a lot

madduci 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I hope they were work-life balance boundaries

nottorp 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So it's the kind of work place where you have to set boundaries? :)

ManuelKiessling 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You need to set your bounds in every single workplace, because no one workplace can set the right boundaries for everyone.

ramon156 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We work in different timezones so it's a mess. Either people give up their morning or they give up their evening time.

I'm at the bottom of the chain here and have no authority to change this. Given that I'm being let go soon there's not much reason for them to care about my mental state either.

But from the time I've been here, yes, you need to set boundaries or they'll do it for you. It seems like most PMs are used to talking to robots, because that's how they talk to us lately.

y-curious 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

“Set your own boundaries, or someone else will do it for you”

Turtles all the way down

ramon156 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I think this mostly speaks about setting boundaries with your higher-up, which is revolved around you.

So, I guess it would be "Turtles all the way up"

fifilura 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What workplace is not?

paganel 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Statements like this one come for a position of privilege, which is to be expected on a forum like this one targeting techies who are most probably solidly middle-class, but just wanted to point that out. More exactly, most of the (normal) people are NOT in the position of designing their lives, believing otherwise is, again, tainted by said position of privilege.

integralid 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You either misunderstood or we disagree fundamentally. Everyone can and should design their life. Of course richer people have a lot more choices, and poorer people a lot more constraints, but everyone can make informed choices.

Believing "most of the normal people" have no agency is condescending.

bboozzoo 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Oh they have agency. They also have bills to pay, families to take care of and many other obligations that folks of privilege do not need to be bothered with. It is immediately obvious how privileged we are compared to many others who are not a liberty of designing their lives or careers.

integralid 6 hours ago | parent [-]

>They also have bills to pay, families to take care of and many other obligations

I honestly don't get your point. I also have bills to pay and a family to take care of. Almost everyone does. I can't just quit my job and spend my life sunbathing on a sunny island, even though that sounds way better than my office job.

The number of people who have so much that they don't ever need to worry about bills or affording a family is tiny, even among HN users. This is also not what "designing your life" is about.

To be clear, I acknowledge my privilege - I have a relatively high salary (but not US-high, not even 6 USD figures) and don't need to worry about day-to-day survival. I just fundamentally disagree that there is some threshold below which people can't make decisions about their own life or career.

aduty 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They're just speaking from their own place of privilege.

5 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
the_af 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't think it's condescending to believe a large number of people mostly cannot design their lives. At best they can try to make it better for their children, if at all.

Why is this condescending? It's not their fault, it's how the system works and their bad luck in not being born into a more privileged position. For people who cannot make ends meet, trying to make ends meet takes most of their available time and energy, there's not much left to ponder about life's choices.

What it is, in my opinion, is terribly unfair. I agree with the GP commenter that us here mostly ignore this reality. And that's OK, clearly TFA is aimed at privileged people like us, not most people.

BeetleB 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

> I don't think it's condescending to believe a large number of people mostly cannot design their lives. At best they can try to make it better for their children, if at all.

If they have children, barring some violent circumstances, then they've already participated in designing their life.

This is not a binary issue. All of us have choices and make decisions (feeding family, paying rent, not robbing a bank - all of these are choices). Yes, people in privileged positions have a much larger "choice space". And yes, plenty of underprivileged folks simply refuse to pursue the choices they have. Both these things can be true.

But sure - no one is denying that some folks exist who, either due to their own design or otherwise (e.g. health issues), may be stuck and their agency is significantly diminished.

5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
hollerith 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I never considered that angle because no one ever explained it to me. It feels like this "privilege" concept explains a great deal about society. It is like a master key.

Someone recently told me about Jesus and the fact that he died to cleanse my sins. I never heard that one before either.