| ▲ | California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations(dmv.ca.gov) |
| 156 points by NullHypothesist 3 hours ago | 96 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | willio58 an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I didn’t think I’d be so pro Waymo but anecdotally I had a fantastic experience with one recently. I was at a music show very late ~1-2am in SF and walked out to grab an uber to the airbnb I was staying at. I kept getting assigned an uber, then I’d wait 10 minutes, then they’d cancel. Rinse and repeat for 30 minutes, mind you I even resorted to calling Lyfts at the same time and nothing bit. Then I say screw it and download Waymo. 1 minute and it’s accepted my ride, and I know it’s not going to cancel because it’s a robot. 3 minutes and it picks me up. The car is clean, quiet, I can play my own music in it via Spotify, and it’s driving honestly more safely than some uber drivers I’ve had in SF. It’s one of the few things where the end result actually lives up to the promise from a tech company. |
| |
| ▲ | krat0sprakhar an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > then I’d wait 10 minutes, then they’d cancel. Rinse and repeat for 30 minutes, This is such a common problem in SF (esp in odd times / from the airport). Waymo has been a lifesaver in these situations. | | |
| ▲ | m-ee an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Used to happen to me constantly trying to go across the bay bridge in either direction when I lived in Oakland. I didn’t even mind the cancelations so much but the worst was when they would try and hide around the block, close enough to say they’ve “arrived” to try to get me marked as a no show and pocket the fee. | | |
| ▲ | virtue3 an hour ago | parent [-] | | They have a cancellation rate metric on their end that they are trying to avoid. I have similar problems when I dated someone across the bridge. They also lose a ton of money leaving SF at prime time / etc. |
| |
| ▲ | astrange an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I once got stuck at the vista point at the north end of Golden Gate, because it turns out it's nearly impossible to approach from the Marin side even though that's closer. So like ~4 drivers in a row tried, got lost on the way and canceled. | |
| ▲ | tudelo an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't know what it is but in basically every major airport I have struggled to get an uber/lyft. I expect at minimum one cancellation... | | |
| ▲ | decimalenough 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | In many cities this is solved with the "Uber rank" system, where you simply get in the first car in line, give the driver a code, and then it loads up your journey. Fast and avoids any hassles with drivers rejecting your destination. | |
| ▲ | wtfwhateven 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Same. I assume it depends on the destination Person wants to go somewhat far from airport? That's more time on this single ride and less time pocketing peak demand money |
|
| |
| ▲ | bitpush an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Curious why didn't you try Waymo until then? Was it just that it never had a reason to, or was something holding you back? From my experience, lot of people actively seek out Waymo if it is available. | |
| ▲ | davidw an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I took one in SF on a rainy, dark night when I was visiting a year ago. I was pretty impressed. That's not an easy city to navigate even on a sunny day and it did fine. | |
| ▲ | kilroy123 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The same exact thing happened to me last time I was in San Fran. I wanted uber because it was cheaper. Ended up taking a Waymo for more because no one else would take me. | |
| ▲ | poszlem an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not saying this HAS to happen. But I remember when Ubers were clean, quiet, cheap too. I think you are just looking at a product before the enshittification, when they still have to pretend they care about your comfort. | | |
| ▲ | davidw an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I wonder what the non-subsidized price of a Waymo ride would be. | | |
| ▲ | whatshisface an hour ago | parent [-] | | Lower prices for recommended destinations, ads played during trip, LLM engages the customer. |
| |
| ▲ | conradev 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You're not allowed to smoke cigarettes in a Waymo, whereas UberX drivers are allowed to, I believe, off the clock. I do worry in general about what the enshittification of Waymo will look like, though. | |
| ▲ | Rodeoclash an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It will undoubtedly get enshittifed in its own way, probably higher prices, but at least it will be reliable when booked. Ubers seem to be a crap shoot these days if they're actually going to come and get you. | | | |
| ▲ | sneak an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Uber, when it was launched, was limos only, and would come (with ETA) when cabs would not. It was expensive. The story they told is that they were unable to get a ride. That’s not enshittification, that’s simply scammers on the platform not doing their job. That won’t happen with robots. They might raise the prices, or clean the cars less frequently, but if it shows up and runs the program, it won’t ever get worse than that. | | |
| ▲ | astrange an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Uber still is like that if you choose that option. It just defaults to UberX because that's cheaper. I dunno, I've never been in a dirty Uber/Lyft. But yes, I originally switched to them because Bay Area cabs just will not pick you up if they don't feel like it. | |
| ▲ | explodes an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | In-Ride Ads coming soon to a car ride near you |
|
| |
| ▲ | gcheong an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | "I know it’s not going to cancel because it’s a robot" I won't be at all surprised when they start calculating their profits in real-time, if they aren't already, and cancelling or delaying trips that are deemed unprofitable in the moment. They are robots after all. | | |
| ▲ | bryanlarsen an hour ago | parent [-] | | Waymo already does that through its surge pricing mechanism and limited availability of cars at busy times. And if they really don't want to serve you they'd just not let you book. | | |
| ▲ | maxerickson an hour ago | parent [-] | | No 3rd party arbitrage, much reduced pressure to accept fares they don't want (there's probably still some). |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | arjie 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The effectiveness with which AVs have been able to test and spread despite local municipalities being fairly luddite about them does provide positive evidence for the idea that states are the right level of government for many of these decisions. If this had been entirely up to Bay Area municipalities it would have been infeasible, and this outcome and the lives consequently saved will be due to state-level decision-makers being able to make better decisions than local municipal decision-makers. If the urban sprawl of the Bay Area were (correctly, in my opinion) represented as a single fused city-county like Tokyo, I think we would have better governance, but highly fragmented municipalities means we have a lot of free-rider vetos. |
| |
| ▲ | BurningFrog an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Maybe. It would still not be governed by Japanese politicians... | | |
| ▲ | piva00 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Also, if state government was Tokyo-level of public service then CA would have had decent public transportation a very long time ago, eradicating a huge part of the value proposal of Waymo. | | |
| ▲ | astrange 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Japan Rail is public-private and many of the other train lines are fully private. "Public" is kind of an empty distinction here, Americans associate the two concepts because they think mass transit is a kind of gift you give to poor people instead of something everyone actually uses. But there is plenty of need for car-shaped transit in Japan and people take taxis and use cars all the time. You might have luggage/equipment to take somewhere, it might be raining and you don't want to walk the last mile, etc. (It's surprisingly hard to take luggage through transit in Tokyo. For instance, maps apps won't give you a transit route that uses elevators, even though everyone with a baby carrier would use it.) | | |
| ▲ | arjie 31 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > Americans associate the two concepts because they think mass transit is a kind of gift you give to poor people instead of something everyone actually uses. Huh, funny. This model actually explains American behavior to me greatly. Now I understand why the emphasis on transit in the US is primarily on cost and shelter rather than on quality of service. I always thought it seemed odd that they'd emphasize making things that are not useful free rather than making them as costly as is required to make them useful. But I was modeling 'useful' as optimal transportation across fare-classes. They are modeling 'useful' as 'compassion to the less well-off'. This also explains opposition to HOT lanes and so on. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | jerlam an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't see any reason that individual Bay Area cities cannot pass laws against Waymo operating there. Why they would do so is a different matter. I'm hopeful though. | | |
| ▲ | arjie an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I suspect the reason is that California cities do not, in fact, have control over this aspect of regulation. I won't claim to be a policy expert, but the failed SB-915[0] seems to imply that this is the case. SB-915 was a proposed bill to allow cities to permit or regulate AVs. It seems reasonable that if a law was attempted to be passed to permit cities to regulate AVs and the bill fails even after modification that it was the case that cities were previously unable to regulate AVs and cities remain unable to regulate AVs. Absent greater knowledge on the subject, that is. 0: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml... | |
| ▲ | polishTar 26 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Municipalities are generally preempted from regulating matters of statewide concern. In CA, the state decided to have the CA DMV regulate operational safety and the CPUC regulate the commercial service. Individual cities are prevented from enacting local laws that encroach upon state authority. | | |
| ▲ | jeffbee 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The bar for "statewide concern" is also extremely low. It basically includes whatever the state government choose to pay attention to. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | kfarr an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is super awesome but to set expectations it appears that Waymo is quite limited by fleet capacity in all of its current operating zones, so as a practical matter it may be months or years before it operates in all these areas. If you're interested in this stuff I highly recommend this podcast, not affiliated with it I genuinely think it's a great source to hear about the behind the scenes of fleet operations to meet demand:
https://www.roadtoautonomy.com/autonomy-markets/ (Edit) I prefer using the apple podcast app, here's a direct link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/autonomy-markets/id177... |
| |
| ▲ | jeffbee 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Their ground ops contractor Transdev has been hiring recently in Sacramento so if any new territory is coming soon, I expect it to be Sacramento. |
|
|
| ▲ | 51Cards 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I rode in one of these in Phoenix in June, loved the experience! Had to go to a pharmacy so purposely picked one a half hour across the city so I could just watch the car perform. Felt like the future (though it did glitch once). Made a sudden turn off the road into a parking lot, did a lap of the outside of the parking lot, and exited back onto the same road to continue on. Must have thought something was blocking the road and made a detour around it? Other than that it seemed pretty flawless. |
|
| ▲ | kylehotchkiss 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm so excited how much of Southern California is opened - Waymo LAX to SD after midnight (there's no trains or buses from 12 to 6)!! |
| |
| ▲ | bob_theslob646 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | How do you get home if you do not have transit? What is the typical cost of a cab then? | | |
| ▲ | kylehotchkiss an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Last time I was in that situation, it was deliberating whether to spend the night in a hotel, the airport, or the train station until 6am when the trains start back up. | |
| ▲ | Rebelgecko an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've never been in that boat but if you don't want an exorbitant Uber, it's probably cheapest to either get a hotel and take Amtrak in the morning or just rent a car. LA and SD are close enough that it often won't accrue any "one-way" fees | |
| ▲ | trillic an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | $150-$200 if you book ahead. | | |
| ▲ | codethief an hour ago | parent [-] | | Jeez. How much is a Waymo gonna be? | | |
| ▲ | trillic 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I only do LAX if it’s cheaper/ faster than SAN. LAX is so much better connected in terms of direct flights because of the competition the cost/time is often worth it. I’d rather sit in a cab than get stuck in ATL/DTW/SLC. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | pfooti 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Looking forward to the highway expansion next. I had to get from mountain view to san francisco yesterday, and waymo was _able_ to do this trip, it was going to take several hours and get routed up el camino real the whole way. Luckily I was standing very close to a caltrain station when I needed the ride, so i just caltrained, and then waymo'd from the SF station to where i needed to be. |
| |
| ▲ | CaliforniaKarl an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | BTW, this is the way: Assuming nothing exceptional, with the every-half-hour or better frequency, I use Waymo to get to a Caltrain station, take Caltrain to a nearby stop, and then Waymo from there to destination. | |
| ▲ | CamelCaseName 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Highway expansion is already here in many areas! Waymo has been laying the groundwork for this rapid rollout for so many years and it's amazing to see it all come together. | | |
| ▲ | smlacy an hour ago | parent [-] | | What's the pricing like? Taking an Uber/Lyft all the way from Mountain View to SF is outrageously expensive, I presume Waymo is the same? | | |
| ▲ | uranium an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Waymo's usually something like 50% more expensive than Lyft in SF, in my experience. But the drivers don't tailgate, have colds, listen to your conversation (AFAIK)...I'll generally opt for Waymo now if I have a choice. The biggest problem I have is that it's usually a longer wait due to the smaller fleet size, but if I'm planning ahead, I'll just book one for a given time, and that takes care of it. | |
| ▲ | astrange an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Lyft from MV to SF is like $100 I think? It's definitely not enjoyable but for Bay Area prices it's not ruinously expensive. You /should/ be able to save by using shared rides, but in practice when I tried the driver was so mad they just dumped me on the side of the road and I had to call and get a refund. The new Caltrain schedule isn't half bad though, if it came twice as often on the weekends we'd be cooking. |
|
| |
| ▲ | astrange an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you a Waymo tester? I haven't gotten Bay Area access yet despite it being released, and when I checked with support they were just like "oh we lied, it's for trusted testers only." I dug up my email and found they'd sent me the tester application form like a year ago and I just forgot to fill it out, so maybe they'll let me in sometime. (Also, the chat claimed the support agent was named Al Pacino. Unless it was a pun on AI and I just couldn't tell with the font.) |
|
|
| ▲ | epicureanideal an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m looking forward to the day when the cost of taking one of these falls to somewhere 20% above the cost of fuel and wear and tear on the vehicle, making it incredibly cheap to take a ride anywhere you’d reasonably want to be driven to. |
| |
| ▲ | freddie_mercury an hour ago | parent [-] | | How do you know it isn't already at that price? Uber estimated that it costs Waymo $2/mile to operate. Google says they charge $1.60 to $2.60 a mile, depending on location and demand, so Waymo is already almost certainly at the price you claim you'd be taking it. I think you dramatically underestimate how much it actually costs to operate a car. Most people think they pay $0 to garage their car, for instance, since the cost was rolled into the price of their house purchase and mostly invisible. But it isn't $0 to a business. Likewise, very few people depreciate their car over just 5 years. Or clean it inside and out every single day. Here's one attempt at costs for Waymo that finds it costs them about $60,000 a year to operate a single car. Also notice the comments talking about how the per vehicle price is high, how that flows into higher insurance, and all kinds of other things. https://www.reddit.com/r/waymo/comments/1il5d5i/unit_costs_p... Maybe someday there will be a discount AV taxi company using 10 year old beat up Honda Civics that only get cleaned once a month and provide extremely barebones support to pull the costs down to $1/mile. That's a 50% drop in costs from today, so hard to see it coming very quickly. But that's still pretty expensive to be using as a daily commuter! And note that the IRS per mile rate is $0.70/mile. It's not perfect but it is a decent third party estimate of the true cost of operating a car. Hard to see any taxi company charging anything less than that. So a 10 mile commute every day is still going to cost you $280/month in an AV taxi for the foreseeable future. | | |
| ▲ | tshaddox an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > Most people think they pay $0 to garage their car, for instance, since the cost was rolled into the price of their house purchase and mostly invisible. But it isn't $0 to a business. And on the other hand, each Waymo parking spot is probably a lot cheaper per unit time than 250 square feet inside a house in a residential area. And presumably they need a lot less than 1 parking spot per car. > Here's one attempt at costs for Waymo that finds it costs them about $60,000 a year to operate a single car. Doesn't that sound cheap? If a car can average 10 rides per day, that's $16 per ride. | |
| ▲ | tobyjsullivan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Google says they charge $1.60 to $2.60 a mile That’s surprising. I’ve been trying to find data on rates and crowd-sourced data and anecdotes seem closer to $6/mile | |
| ▲ | maxerickson 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Is it clear that they are decommissioning them when they are done depreciating them? | |
| ▲ | skinnymuch 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’ve never seen a Waymo ride be even close to $2/mile |
|
|
|
| ▲ | OGEnthusiast an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Waymo has so far been awesome, can't imagine choosing an Uber/Lyft over a Waymo when both are available options. I wonder how much they are bottlenecked by vehicle production though. |
| |
| ▲ | Zigurd an hour ago | parent [-] | | There's a huge difference between a robot who accepts all rides, and a two sided market as in the ride hailing apps. Without the factor of drivers picking their rides, the relatively small Waymo fleet has an outsize impact. The whole fleet is available 24/7/365. I would bet that Waymos rule the night. |
|
|
| ▲ | HPMOR 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So when will they be available for commercial rides? Can't wait to waymo from SF to Berkeley! |
|
| ▲ | bix6 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Was curious on the Zeekr RT. Interesting to see it’s owned by Geely. https://www.motortrend.com/news/waymo-zeekr-rt-autonomous-ev... |
|
| ▲ | tcdent 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The map area for the Southern California service area is absolutely massive. Without traffic, at highway speeds, it would take you almost four hours to travel from the North end to the South end. |
|
| ▲ | janalsncm 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I believe that in 20 years there will be cities (probably not in America) where all cars are autonomous. There will be no red lights, no parking lots, less congestion, fewer accidents. |
|
| ▲ | jmspring 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| First used Waymo in Phoenix. It was a decent experience. The funny thing was watching it handle parallel parking. I mentioned it to the wife - self driving with parkinsons. This last weekend, we were in the city (San Francisco) and literally drove by a Waymo trying to park and the wife started laughing - "you are right". |
|
| ▲ | __grob 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is so cool to see. Saw tons of Waymo in LA/Santa Monica area when I was there in October. Very excited to see them expand basically all through SoCal! |
|
| ▲ | redwood 6 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No santa cruz eh? |
|
| ▲ | Tade0 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This gives me hope that once I'm too old to drive, this tech will reach my, very distant from the US west coast, corner of the world. And if not Waymo and its car, then perhaps autonomous buses. There's already a shortage of bus drivers in my city and it's not getting any smaller. |
|
| ▲ | int0x29 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My general experience with Waymos and safety is that while they are generally quite safe and communicative drivers (They have a pedestrian yeild indicator that should be required by law) they tend to create safety issues because people drive stupidly around them. A lot of SF drivers seem to see them, think I know better, and then proceed to do something dumb. I'm not really sure how to fix this problem. Also if any Waymo engineers are reading this please make the pedestrian yeild indicator icon visible on the front of the LIDAR. In narrow streets the front is much more visible to pedestrians than the sides as the LIDAR is pretty far back on the car. |
|
| ▲ | ElijahLynn an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What is the dark spot on the maps? Was that the current and then the less dark is the expansion? |
| |
|
| ▲ | siliconc0w an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do the driving tests cover what you're supposed to do if you hit a Waymo or one hits you? I assume the cops are instructed just to ignore them? |
|
| ▲ | alooPotato 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| why is there an approved map? like i get having a pilot somewhere but once that goes well (and we're way past that point), why isn't it just blanket approval everywhere. Why would one county be allowed waymos but not another. I get that they might not be approved in the high sierras but just make that a deny list not allow list. Or even just deny the specific conditions you're worried about (snow). |
| |
| ▲ | dragonwriter an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | There's an approved map because the approval process requires the manufacturer to specify both areas and conditions they are applying for, and documents supporting that the vehicle is ready to be operated autonomously in those areas and conditions (which doesn't just include technical readiness, but also administrative readiness in the form of things like a law enforcement interaction plan, etc.) > like i get having a pilot somewhere but once that goes well (and we're way past that point), why isn't it just blanket approval everywhere. Because “everywhere” isn't a uniform domain (Waymo is kind of way out in one tail of the distribution in terms of both the geographical range and range of conditions they have applied for and been approved to operate in, other AV manufacturers are in much tinier zones, and narrow road/weather conditions.) And because for some AV manufacturers (if there is one that can demonstrate they don't need this, they'd probably have an easier lift getting broader approvals) part of readiness to deploy (or test) in an area is detailed, manufacturer specific mapping/surveying of the roads. | | |
| ▲ | alooPotato 16 minutes ago | parent [-] | | My question is why they even have to apply for specific areas to begin with? Just approve the manufacturer for certain conditions and let them operate wherever they want. |
| |
| ▲ | throwaway48476 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I suspect it's limited by what the request was for. Waymo has to create the high res map before they can offer service. | | |
| ▲ | alooPotato 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Right but what does that have to do with the DMV. Waymo should apply for certain weather conditions and then the DMV says yes or no, then they stay the hell out of the way. Let waymo operate whereever they want and expand however they see fit and whenever they feel ready. Like the DMV is actually checking Waymos map of a new area is good to go or not. Its just administrative burden. | |
| ▲ | BoorishBears an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think laypeople vastly overestimate how much the maps are a bottleneck compared to boring things like infrastructure to charge, people to clean the vehicles, integrating with local governments to allow things like disabling Pickup/Dropoff in certain areas at certain times, etc. Even with local partners that all takes a lot of time. |
| |
| ▲ | sbuttgereit an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | More of the state is not allowed than is... at least by geography. Also, there's a practical element. If I have to specify where they can't go, the default position is they can go anywhere... if I inadvertently leave an area out of my black-list where it really ought to exist: the default is "permission granted". With a white-list, the worst case is a forgotten or neglected area can't be operated in as a default and the AV provider will have an interest in correcting. But also politics. It's a very different message to say we're going to white-list a given AV operator to exist in different areas vs. black-listing them from certain areas. |
|
|
| ▲ | Fricken 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's been a long time coming, but Waymo is doing it. Waymo is scaleable and on the march! They've been announcing plans to roll out in new cities every month or 2 all year, and by the end of 2026 they'll be testing or offering the public rides over 30 metropolitan areas. I'm most curious to see how they do in the winter city of Minneapolis over the next several months. |
| |
| ▲ | njarboe 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Competition does encourage action. Glad Tesla started rolling out their robotaxies. | | |
| ▲ | bitpush an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Are you suggesting that Waymo is responding to Tesla? My reading it Waymo was always on a schedule and Tesla wasn't a factor First slowly and then suddenly. | |
| ▲ | hintklb 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Tesla is not competition to Waymo. There are 10 other companies that are currently testing without a driver. Those are competition. Tesla so far is a gimmick of self-driving with a safety driver that takes over once in a while. That's where Waymo was more than 5 years ago. | | |
| ▲ | qwerpy 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The recent version of FSD in my Tesla is pretty amazing. Press "Start FSD" when in my driveway, and 20 minutes later it arrives at my destination and parks, without any input from me the entire time. I was skeptical too about FSD for a while but I'm starting to believe. These days I pretty much only disengage it when I'm impatient that it's being too polite. Unsupervised isn't far off! |
| |
| ▲ | epolanski 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The dancing robots are going to drive them. | | |
| |
| ▲ | SkyPuncher an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I took my first Waymo in SF this week. As a midwestern, freezing weather was my immediate first thought. | |
| ▲ | dijipiji 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | yeah - me too |
|
|
| ▲ | eduction 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| “Map increase?” Is that hackernewsish for “larger area”? |
|
| ▲ | throwaway48476 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's disappointing that where I live is politically difficult and waymo won't come anytime soon. |
| |
|
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Whoah, Waymo would be able to take one from Mountain View to Napa. (I get why Cupertino is excluded. But. Oof. Come on.) |
| |
| ▲ | alooPotato 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | why?` | | |
| ▲ | NullHypothesist 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Cupertino is in there, no? | | |
| ▲ | benatkin 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It appears not to be. Here are the ones in Santa Clara County: - Milpitas - Mountain View - Palo Alto Santa - San Jose - Sunnyvale - Unincorporated Area (Lexington
Hills area, overlapping Santa
Clara and Santa Cruz Counties) I don't know why it says "Palo Alto Santa" Edit: I guess it's "Palo Alto Santa" to disambiguate between Palo Alto, which is in Santa Clara County, and East Palo Alto, which is in San Mateo County (BTW the westmost point of East Palo Alto is east of the westmost point of Palo Alto, but the eastmost point of East Palo Alto is not east of the eastmost point of Palo Alto). | | |
| ▲ | tricolon 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Looking at the city limits, I don't understand why East Palo Alto isn't called North Palo Alto instead. | |
| ▲ | astrange an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | It looks like the map includes north of 280, so you can use it to go to Gamba Karaoke and Tea Era. And really, what else could you need from Cupertino? |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | tonypapousek 12 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Personally, I can’t wait to be killed by a cold, uncaring robot. Let’s goooo |