Remix.run Logo
numbers 5 hours ago

this reminds me of a friend who we've excluded from the group b/c of the age old advice of "the worst they can say is no". Well, we invited him to everything at first it was either no responses or late responses like "sorry was busy with work".

The whole friend group took their turns and attempts at inviting him.

It sort of stopped altogether when we started getting responses like "hey, don't call me without scheduling a call with me before" or getting a text 3 days later "hey what's up, I don't want to hang out".

He's a workaholic and believes his work is the most important thing (he switches jobs every 6-9 months) so the whole friend group has now just stopped trying.

For context, this has been going on for 10 years and about a year ago everyone stopped trying.

xg15 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think there is a difference between making it clear to a person they'll always have the option to join - and pushing that person to join.

Anna in the story did not express regret that she never joined. And as far as we know, Alexei wasn't expecting her to take his invitations either - because it wasn't about actually getting her to go to the party, it was just about communicating to her that the "we've stopped inviting you to our group events because you always say no" moment never happened and she was still a part of the group. That was what she had appreciated in the end.

On the other hand, what your group attempted seems more like a concerted push to change the person's behavior. Most people would probably reject that if they want to stay in control of their own plans.

squigz 5 hours ago | parent [-]

What? The group's behavior is basically just being a group of friends and inviting another friend?

xg15 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, I read that part like it was coordinated: "The whole friend group took their turns and attempts at inviting him."

But yeah, might have misunderstood.

In any case, the guy made clear he didn't really want to be part of that group, so then I wouldn't keep asking him either.

Ancapistani 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It sort of stopped altogether when we started getting responses like "hey, don't call me without scheduling a call with me before" or getting a text 3 days later "hey what's up, I don't want to hang out".

This is a good thing!

It doesn't (necessarily) mean that person doesn't want to be friends or doesn't value your group; it means they feel comfortable telling you how they feel even though doing so is a mild violation of social norms.

If I were in your shoes, I'd just make sure they're not accidentally booted from the group chat (etc.), but otherwise just leave them be. Maybe a couple of times a year mention something like "We're all going to ___ next week, if you'd like to join. No stress!" just as a keepalive, but otherwise let them do their own thing.

I have several very close, long-term friends that I've not spoken to in months or years, because that's just who we are and where we are in life. If any of them called me in an emergency I'd drop everything to help them, and I'm 100% confident they would do the same. We _have_ done that for each other before.

cultofmetatron 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>For context, this has been going on for 10 years and about a year ago everyone stopped trying.

frankly I'm a little jealous.... I can't imagine anyone, let alone a whole friend group, putting in that level of effort to stay in touch with me. I would probably disappear from everyone's imaginations if I didn't regularly reach out to people.

squigz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I was all ready to respond and defend this guy, but... yeah, no.

All advice has limits. In this case, "telling your friends to schedule their calls with you" is that limit... and then some.

Ancapistani 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I strongly disagree.

Maybe it's an age thing, a "head of household" thing, or just an A(u)DHD thing - but I've definitely been in places in my life where I didn't have time to do anything discretionary.

To put it another way - if they're willing to ask you to schedule time to talk to them, they're already violating social norms. Why would they bother to give you a way to get ahold of them if they didn't value the relationship? Why not just reply "I don't want to talk to you" instead?

It sounds to me like they're legitimately just way too busy, to the point that they're likely well down the road toward burnout and don't even have time for themselves.

63stack 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Making demands about how you want to be contacted when the group has been trying to include you for years is a dick move at minimum. You can say sorry I'll call you back in 10 if you are busy.

Trying to dress this up as adhd/age/head of household (what is that even??) is just expecting the world to revolve around you

No, learn to be a decent person.

michaelt 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

To me, it sounds like both sides are communicating successfully.

The group of friends is saying "you are invited" to someone probably disinterested - polite and inclusive to some, bothersome spam to others.

The 'workaholic' is saying "no thanks, and please stop bothering me"

The group of friends is stopping bothering him

Good clear adult communication, clearly expressing boundaries and gladly respecting them.