|
| ▲ | nightski 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's just as dumb though because the act of processing doesn't really mean anything. |
| |
| ▲ | 2OEH8eoCRo0 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | If it didn't mean anything then why the findings in the article? | | |
| ▲ | nightski 4 days ago | parent [-] | | The findings in the article basically came down to - people eat more calories when it tastes good. Even the article itself admits there are a multitude of other factors that could account for the results other than UPF. |
| |
| ▲ | snapcaster 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It absolutely does if you're able to take off the pedantry glasses for like 5 seconds. Why are you nitpicking this? is it because you actually think articles like this are about chopping carrots? "if it couldn't be made outside of a factory, don't eat it." from someone else in the comments is pretty clear | | |
| ▲ | mewpmewp2 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Why jump from one weird statement to another? Maybe even a worse one? |
| |
| ▲ | cynicalpeace 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Here we go again... |
|
|
| ▲ | mewpmewp2 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's still a misleading term, so it would be good to talk about what the actual harm is, as to not confuse people. And it does confuse, since I vividly remember as a kid being confused by it, and it's important to have healthy habits from a young age. It always sounded a bit weird that food being "processed" means it's bad, so I didn't understand it really. And if you don't focus on the harm, but use terms like this, it's hard to say what is pseudoscience and what is actual science. |
|
| ▲ | tjpnz 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Until you add ketchup. |
