▲ | monknomo 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
do you really think briefly cooking milk significantly reduces its nutritional content | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Xeoncross 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Think about it, you're heating the milk up enough to kill the bacteria right? That's what I'm talking about. It's funny because when people are instructed by their doctors to eat yogurt to get beneficial bacteria back in their gut, the companies are having to cultivate the bacteria the again, then add it back to the pasteurized dairy to replace the stuff that was killed by pasteurization. It's like people adding minerals back to water that was filtered to remove everything. To most people, "nutritional content" means the protein and sugar on the label. There is a lot more to what your body needs though that what is on that little label. Again, I don't think raw milk is for everyone, but there are reasons why people drink it when they could get the cheaper pasteurized stuff. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | itishappy 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes? Isn't that the whole point? It has a bunch of biological content that needs to be broken down. The nutritional content changes while sitting on the shelf, why wouldn't heat affect that? > According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, it was found that pasteurization appeared to reduce concentrations of vitamins B12 and E, but it also increased concentrations of vitamin A. |