| ▲ | asjkff 4 hours ago |
| Disclaimer: I am still finding my way in life, so take this theory with a grain of salt. New age movement, claim everything on earth is actually a hologram of the universe, experiencing itself. So perhaps, just being in close proximity with another coral, the hologram frequency was now more in tuned. |
|
| ▲ | rbn3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Since you mentioned you’re still finding your way in life: please be aware that the appeal of a lot of new age and „woo“ is that the act of noticing a pattern in nature, that feeling of „aaah NOW it makes sense“ is inherently pleasant and can become something you chase like a drug. These frameworks or schools of thought can provide a steady source of that feeling without necessarily being tethered to reality at all. Kind of like acid - very fun at times but catastrophic if you make it a core part of your identity. |
| |
| ▲ | Terr_ 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Slightly Related: Beware any community which insists you show "loyalty" by doing things that burn-bridges so that nobody else will be your friend. Trapping you is how cults and abusive-relationships work. | |
| ▲ | hmokiguess an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well said, I have found myself in this place before in life and it can be quite dangerous |
|
|
| ▲ | hmokiguess 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why would the frequency of the healthy one win over the frequency of the non-healthy one though? I assume both would have their own frequencies, are you implying there's an order or tendency across frequencies? |
| |
| ▲ | asjkff 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Same reason, stem cells repair damage body cells, I guess. I am just glad coral can repair themselves. Thumbs up to the researcher. | | |
| ▲ | hmokiguess 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I am just trying to understand your ideas and riff on them Cells are complex organisms and contain programming in their nature so we can more easily trace and understand its reasons A frequency is something a lot more raw than a cell | | |
| ▲ | asjkff 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I will repeat this for the last time. I am not an expert in the field. "programming in their nature" means they have a range of frequency, like a radio? perharps. Nevertheless, thumbs up to the researcher. Positive vibes. | | |
| ▲ | willy_k an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | My interpretation is “Programming in their nature” -> their being, meaning the molecular structure that defines them, is a program, a complex program, one executed by the interpreter that is physics. | |
| ▲ | hmokiguess an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm not quite following your defensive style of writing. What's up with that? Do you believe only experts can contribute to discussions and ideas? Are you afraid of sounding "dumb"? No question/idea is stupid and it's okay to be wrong or to learn something by putting yourself out there! | | |
| ▲ | lovemenot 5 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Not the person you are replying to. I guess they feel somewhat humiliated. There can sometimes be a fine line between scientific curiosity and the appearance of bullying. Common courtesy suggests we should back off whenever we feel that might be applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | willy_k 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| You might be interested in Catholic theology + philosophy. It takes a LOT of background, and a lot of time to accumulate it, but you clearly have some already, and once you get comfortable with reframing terms that have a lot of societal baggage attached to simpler, honest understandings (for example, God, as a sky dude vs the universe as a mind), you can go so far. |
