Why would the frequency of the healthy one win over the frequency of the non-healthy one though? I assume both would have their own frequencies, are you implying there's an order or tendency across frequencies?

▲

asjkff 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Same reason, stem cells repair damage body cells, I guess.

I am just glad coral can repair themselves.

Thumbs up to the researcher.

▲

hmokiguess 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I am just trying to understand your ideas and riff on them

Cells are complex organisms and contain programming in their nature so we can more easily trace and understand its reasons

A frequency is something a lot more raw than a cell

▲

asjkff 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I will repeat this for the last time. I am not an expert in the field.

"programming in their nature" means they have a range of frequency, like a radio? perharps.

Nevertheless, thumbs up to the researcher. Positive vibes.

▲

willy_k an hour ago | parent | next [-]

My interpretation is “Programming in their nature” -> their being, meaning the molecular structure that defines them, is a program, a complex program, one executed by the interpreter that is physics.

▲

hmokiguess an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not quite following your defensive style of writing. What's up with that?

Do you believe only experts can contribute to discussions and ideas? Are you afraid of sounding "dumb"?

No question/idea is stupid and it's okay to be wrong or to learn something by putting yourself out there!

	▲	lovemenot 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Not the person you are replying to. I guess they feel somewhat humiliated. There can sometimes be a fine line between scientific curiosity and the appearance of bullying. Common courtesy suggests we should back off whenever we feel that might be applicable.