I will repeat this for the last time. I am not an expert in the field.

"programming in their nature" means they have a range of frequency, like a radio? perharps.

Nevertheless, thumbs up to the researcher. Positive vibes.

My interpretation is “Programming in their nature” -> their being, meaning the molecular structure that defines them, is a program, a complex program, one executed by the interpreter that is physics.

▲

hmokiguess 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not quite following your defensive style of writing. What's up with that?

Do you believe only experts can contribute to discussions and ideas? Are you afraid of sounding "dumb"?

No question/idea is stupid and it's okay to be wrong or to learn something by putting yourself out there!

▲

lovemenot 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

Not the person you are replying to. I guess they feel somewhat humiliated. There can sometimes be a fine line between scientific curiosity and the appearance of bullying. Common courtesy suggests we should back off whenever we feel that might be applicable.

	▲	hmokiguess 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I was asking with the intent to make them comfortable though I get your point