| ▲ | siva7 4 hours ago |
| I think you're slightly wrong. It's not prices, it's not logistics. Amazon dominates because they have the power & money to do the one single thing their competiton couldn't do without going out of business: No-questions-asked returns. 9 out of 10 people i ask this is the single reason they stay at Amazon. |
|
| ▲ | sippingabonedry 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The flip side to this is I've on multiple occasions had Amazon ship me clearly used shit resold as new — Amazon.com was the seller. One even came with a sticker: "Thanks for giving this product a second life!" The worst of the worst among us use Amazon as a try-before-you-buy or rental house. Their lax return policy encourages them. If I buy anything important, especially expensive electronics, I buy it from somewhere else. If it's a reputable store with a strict return policy, I'm doubly sure there will be no fuckery. |
| |
| ▲ | stevepike 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This happens with items where it's clear no human even glanced at it. I received a sump pump that was wet and dirty! | | | |
| ▲ | chung8123 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I remember why most of the stuff on the frys shelf was like this. I think it was their downfall and for me i stopped shopping there because of all the broken items. With Amazon at least I don't have a huge cost to drive there and back. | |
| ▲ | IncreasePosts 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Returns are monitored and you will be restricted if it looks like you're abusing the return policy | | |
| ▲ | sippingabonedry 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And yet people continue to do it 1000s of times a day, and they are clearly re-shelving lightly used items. Most of my recent returns were for receiving used product. | | |
| ▲ | IncreasePosts 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | People do it thousands of times a day because tens of millions of people order from amazon each day. But any given person doesn't do it thousands of times, or even hundreds of times. Low tens of times in a year is going to raise alarms in their systems. | |
| ▲ | hermannj314 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I wouldn't believe this until it happened to me. New bedding on prime day - came used and stained. This is fucking disgusting. Amazon is like - we will send you a replacement but you have to print a label, box it back up and drive to a UPS store to return. Why are we working for them for free? You send me soiled bedding and the reply is to make us do work and then get the product we originally bought. I tried quitting these people years ago, its hard to do. | |
| ▲ | gusgus01 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Just wait until they restrict your returns because of how much you've had to return highly used, or broken, or deliverer abused, or knock-off, or arrived days later than projected products. | | |
| ▲ | ornornor 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Happened to me. I ended up holding the bag for about 400 EUR worth of items. Luckily I had legal insurance that tried to convince Amazon to take it back but they wouldn’t, so the assurance bought the box of stuff off me and refunded me. Fuck bezos and Amazon. Since then, I always look for alternatives to Amazon to buy my stuff. I’ll use Amazon to see if I like it, return it, and go buy somewhere else. If I know the product I’ll just straight out buy it somewhere else. It’s often the same price or very close. Some stuff you can’t really and practically get outside of Amazon. I don’t have a choice then. Because their quality is so low, I’ll just get 3–4 similar items and only keep the one that’s passably usable. I try to cost Amazon as much money as I can. I hate to give them my money but by doing this it feels like I’m getting some payback for the way they treat their customers, employees, delivery people… | |
| ▲ | Terr_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Enshittification: Customers get screwed because that's where vendors are (even the terrible ones) and vendors get screwed because that's where the customers are (even the terrible ones.) | |
| ▲ | mindslight 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Maybe this is a country thing, or tied into one's wider social credit score in the background, or the specifics of something you returned [0], or something else? I've returned plenty of shit and have never had a real problem. I returned over a dozen 32 inch Dell monitors while trying to get 3 that didn't have dead pixels or scratches out of the box. They were stacked on a pallet in my garage waiting for the pickup. You would think this would throw some flags and end up as some kind of fight. But no, Amazon refunded them all in full, no hassle (apart from the hassle of having to do that scale of logistics merely to obtain working products). (I would have honestly given up earlier, sent them all back, and gone with a different brand. Except there had been a good one in the first tranche of 3 that I let go past its return date. I hadn't thought the actual failure rate was going to be > 80%) [0] On my personal account I did have a big red scary warning for a while about "restocking fees", that I think had been prompted by returning a motherboard after having tested it (yet another poorly described product with no way to find out the IOMMU groups short of buying it). I have no idea if it was merely that I had opened/tested a computer component, or if it had gotten smashed up on the way back, or what. But eventually that nag screen did go away. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | woadwarrior01 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That used to be the case until about a year ago, but isn't the case anymore at least here in Ireland. I'm taking them to small claims court because they closed my account without a refund on a legitimate return. Their customer support has gone from excellent to nearly nonexistent. Fortunately for me, I've kept all the receipts. |
|
| ▲ | marcosscriven 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I distrust Amazon for anything over about £150 now. Which seems to coincide with their threshold for needing an OTP. The last straw was getting a blood pressure monitor (which they don’t even sell) in place of £400 smart glasses. They insisted I returned the monitor, then said I failed to return the glasses. Took months for them to refund me. |
|
| ▲ | mixdup 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The ease of returns was a huge factor in the early success of Walmart, as well. I worked there in high school and college (99-02 timeframe) and they harped on how much the customer was right for returns, unless it was just blatant fraud. if there was a chance the customer was not trying anything you just give them their money back |
| |
| ▲ | jagged-chisel 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I worked there in the early 90s. The number of times an old, well-worn NES came in as a return, and management authorized it, boggled my mind. | | |
| ▲ | devin 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I would love to know the actual numbers. I bet the customer lifetime value for eating this cost probably won out eventually. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Supermancho 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > 9 out of 10 people i ask this is the single reason they stay at Amazon. 9 out of 10 I ask say it's about reliable delivery (not necessarily next day).
Most people order things because they need them and have read the reviews, not because they are speculating at something they may need or are ok with getting something else. Clothing being a notable exception, unpredictably sized and variable quality, which nobody is happy about. |
|
| ▲ | chrismorgan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’ve only ever returned two things to Amazon: a counterfeit laptop battery (claimed to be an official part, had 30% lower capacity than labelled), and an unbearable replacement laptop keyboard (2KRO rather than the original’s NKRO, with horrific ghosting, a couple of keys that would stick if not pressed completely straight, and a space bar that had to be hit just so to activate at all). Neither of these products would have been available without Amazon, and that would have been a good thing. |
|
| ▲ | velcrovan 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Weird. I think I might have made three returns to Amazon in 30 years of ordering from them. I research the shit out of just about everything I buy, if I have to return something it's because I either got very cleverly scammed or had a literal stroke before I made the purchase. |
| |
| ▲ | crazygringo 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I frequently have to return clothing because there's absolutely no way of figuring out which size will fit you since nothing about sizes is standardized. And there's just a lot of stuff that research can't tell you. Sometimes listed dimensions are incorrect or missing. Sometimes it turns out that you buy a simple electronic device that seems like it will do what you need but it emits a high-pitched beep noise every time you press a button that drives you nuts and you're going to return it because of that. There are so many things that just simply are not captured in a product description, and sometimes are not captured by user reviews. I've just ordered an inexpensive steering wheel to use with a racing game. And everything I can find online is contradictory as to whether it suffers from a dead zone problem or not. I simply cannot tell if the people complaining about the dead zone have missed where it can be configured or if it's a problem with the hardware itself. So literally the only way I can figure it out is by ordering it and trying it out and then returning it if it has a dead zone problem. There are plenty of things that you just have to return that cannot be solved with research and have nothing to do with being scammed. Which is why returns are a big part of the economy and a big part of customer service. | | |
| ▲ | jasode 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | >I frequently have to return clothing because there's absolutely no way of figuring out which size will fit you since nothing about sizes is standardized. I used to take advantage of Amazon's return policy by deliberately buying 3 sizes of the same item (1 below and 1 above my expected size) because clothing manufacturers are not consistent with their sizing. I can then try them all at home to choose best size and return the other 2 that don't fit. I did this for pants, shoes, etc. This really seemed great because I hate going to the store and changing clothes in fitting rooms. However, I stopped doing this many years ago because I found out that some online retailers like Amazon do not restock the returned items for re-sale and instead, throw it away so it eventually ends up in a landfill. In those cases, the sellers just eat the cost of unsold goods that got thrown out. It seemed illogical to throw away perfectly good clothes that are still NEW but somebody explained that Amazon does this because they're paranoid about bodily fluids etc tainting the returns. So to play it safe, they just throw away the returns. | | |
| ▲ | ornornor 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > they just throw away the returns. I have no more insider knowledge of how Amazon operates than you do, but judging on the amount of items I’ve received that were clearly used (stains, other people’s hairs, dust, dirt…) but sold as new I’m fairly certain they’ll resell everything that gets returns without even looking at the items. | |
| ▲ | crazygringo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > because I found out that some online retailers like Amazon do not restock the returned items for re-sale and instead, throw it away so it eventually ends up in a landfill This was essentially false, and FUD spread by the anti-Amazon crowd. You will observe official Amazon Resale listings for many items, which is precisely Amazon restocking the returned items. For goods of any signficant value, it is bizarre to suggest that Amazon wouldn't be reselling them. Like, it's ludicrous to suggest they're tossing a $50 shirt instead of reselling it, as long as the return is in resale condition. What Amazon sends to landfills is when items (mostly third-party seller items) aren't selling and the seller doesn't want to keep paying for warehousing or to have them shipped elsewhere so Amazon sends them to landfills. Because nobody is buying the items, there's no demand for them. Not everything sells. Wherever you got the idea that they're paranoid about body fluids, that's somebody who doesn't know what they're talking about. People make up all sorts of things. That's why that have a small army of people inspecting returns. | | |
| ▲ | jasode an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | >You will observe official Amazon Resale listings for many items, which is precisely Amazon restocking the returned items. To clarify, I'm already aware Amazon re-sells returns. I often buy "Used Like New" electronics from Amazon Resale which are obviously customer returns that Amazon re-boxed. However, the category of clothes is different where it customer returns are often thrown out. >What Amazon sends to landfills is when items (mostly third-party seller items) aren't selling and the seller doesn't want to keep paying for warehousing or to have them shipped elsewhere so Amazon sends them to landfills. No, that's not the full story. What's also happening is that a seller has different options for Amazon's reverse logistics and they have different costs. E.g. pay $1.50 for Amazon to inspect and resell or pay a lower $0.52 to throw it away. A lot of sellers just pay 1/3rd less and let Amazon throw it out. That possibility of me inadvertently adding to landfills is enough to stop me from buying 3 sizes and returning 2. Maybe in some circumstances the other 2 returned items won't be thrown out -- but I can't know for sure so I won't do it. I'll continue to buy clothes from Amazon but only do so when I'm 100% sure I'm going to keep it no matter what. Deep link to a video comment about online returned clothes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66qOop6J8Q8&t=2m56s | | |
| ▲ | crazygringo an hour ago | parent [-] | | If you're talking about some $4 item then sure. But most clothing on Amazon isn't $4. If you're buying $30 or $60 items then they are most definitely having them inspected. Because it's not about $1.50 for inspection vs $0.52 to throw it out. It's about -$1.50 + $8 profit = $6.50 gain for inspection vs. -$0.52 + $0 profit = $0.52 loss for throwing it out. You're missing the entire resale price on the return. Companies aren't leaving money on the table. They are looking to maximize profit and minimize losses. In most places, sending resellable stock to the landfill isn't doing that. |
| |
| ▲ | kazinator 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | On the surface of it, it would appear not to make sense. Why would Amazon take on the cost of handling a return item that they will have to dispose? They could just indicate to the user to keep the item --- and that in fact does happen! I had a return like that just this past week. However, there is an obvious incentive to minimize these no-return refunds and require users to print labels and go through the motion of returning items that won't be restocked. It discourages fraud: people abusing the no-return refund as a way of getting free stuff! The no-return refund has to be a kind of perk for the customer who rarely returns anything or whatever. I would say that it would be astonishing if Amazon pretending to accept returns and then throwing away is a thing that absolutely does not happen, and honestly cannot blame them for it. We are a throw-away-stuff society, and Amazon is not outside of that society. | | |
| ▲ | crazygringo an hour ago | parent [-] | | > We are a throw-away-stuff society, and Amazon is not outside of that society. What Amazon does with returns doesn't have anything to do with what kind of "society" you think we are. What it does with returns is determined by the profit motive. And in most cases, the more profitable thing to do is to resell returned merchandise. Yes, return inspections cost money, but usually less money than what is gained by reselling the item. Returned merchandise has value, and businesses don't make profit by throwing value away when they can make money with it or reduce losses with it instead. I genuinely don't understand all the people who think it's more cost-effective for Amazon to send a $50 shirt to the dumpster rather than resell it. That's not how anything works. | | |
| ▲ | kazinator 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What individuals do is also motivated by profit or profit-adjacent motives. Saving money is a profit motive; so is saving time and convenience. > It's more cost-effective for Amazon to send a $50 shirt to the dumpster rather than resell it. It's not a $50 shirt. It's like a $5 shirt to them, which some sucker is willing to pay $50 for. Used, it becomes a $10 shirt. A dumpster can be found right in the neck of the woods of where the returning customer lives, whereas it may have to travel far and pass through more processing if it goes to another customer elsewhere. It needs to be inspected, repacked. There is a risk in every returned item. Sometimes people return a perfectly good item. But sometimes it's because there is something wrong with the item, such that the next buyer is also likely to return it, even if they get it cheaper. Basically returned items are entirely outside of the profit-optimized delivery path. They incur costs and risks, at a reduced revenue. I'd never return an item which matches the description and isn't damaged. If it isn't damaged in any way but does not match the description, that's a problem; if it is sold with the same description, the next customer will also see that it doesn't match. A new listing has to be created for that product. Not gonna happen, or not in the processing time frame of that particular return. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | RussianCow 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I hate to break it to you, but this is true of returns across a lot of companies and product categories. If you return unopened wine to Costco, for example, they throw it out because they can't guarantee that you stored it properly. | | |
| ▲ | jasode 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | >If you return unopened wine to Costco, for example, they throw it out The food and groceries I already knew about. However, Amazon throwing out returned clothes was a surprise because I've seen clothing retailers like Macy's just put the returned items right back on the rack for re-sale. When you go to a shore store, they don't throw out every pair of shoes that customers tried on and didn't buy. So I just thought Amazon just did the same thing at their warehouse. I've also returned car wax to an OReilly's Auto store and I watched the clerk just put the bottle right back on the shelf for the next customer to buy. It was disconcerting to find out I was adding to the landfill just because I returned clothes to Amazon. Nowadays, I don't order clothes from them unless I'm 100% sure I won't be returning it. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | pshan 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think the general internet user doesn't actually do this. Slightly different use case but I worked at maximizing revenue/customer lifetime value at a streaming company and the biggest revenue win project I worked on was just preselecting the most expensive plan. I was surprised since I usually do research and stuff on the options. But it turns out a lot of people just click next until they can start watching some tv. | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There's nothing weird about it. A liberal return policy is not because they expect people to make many returns, it is so that customers will make their purchases without worrying and therefore make more purchases. |
|
|
| ▲ | jflwiejrilewqj 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| FYI, when someone else says "this is why I do this thing", you don't get to argue with that. You don't get to tell other people what their opinions are. Psycho. |
|
| ▲ | gip 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most of the people I know would rank predictability is #1, price #2 and ability to do returns #3 (as a data point: I don't even remember last time I did a return, was years ago). Really depends on who your connections are and their specific needs I reckon. |
|
| ▲ | cljacoby 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| In my experience, the customer-friendly return experience is withering. I ordered a small table about a year ago that didn't ship with the correct hardware. I literally could not assemble the thing as documented in the instructions. I had to call to get a refund; admittedly, I think I may have been slightly outside the ordinary return window. The customer service representative was pretty reluctant to accept it, somewhat heavily suggesting that I didn't assemble it right. I actually just recently cancelled my Amazon Prime, which I've had for probably 10+ years. Not solely based on this one experience, but a general decline in how much perceivable value I actually get out of it. |
|
| ▲ | thundercleeze 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is a strawman. OP said " I shop at Amazon due to their logistics." Nothing in your post refutes why OP shops at Amazon. |
|
| ▲ | kspacewalk2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >No-questions-asked returns Different forms of marketing work on different people. This one works on me. I'm going to shop at Amazon and Costco because, in the very few instances where I want to return an item that didn't live up to its promise, I can do so without incurring penalties. When this happens, I'm already frustrated. I assembled a floor lamp for far longer than an adult should spend assembling it, and it's wobbly as shit. A corporation than nickel-and-dimes me at this point will incur my irrational wrath. Canadian Tire (a big box retailer of mostly low-quality wares here in Canada) has lost my business over a decade ago because of this. I tell myself: most Canadians are meek sheep that will return after being told "well akshually you can't return this because technically blah blah", but I'm not a sucker, I won't shop here on principle. A company that doesn't create this experience for me will get my business and exploit whatever other blind spots I have with their marketing, dark patterns, opaque pricing, etc, because they didn't piss me off when I was ready to walk away for good. |
|
| ▲ | ravenstine 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ehh, maybe for some people. I've almost never returned anything to Amazon, so for me the logistics is definitely the biggest factor. |
|
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > their competiton couldn't do without going out of business Why? If I sell a quality product I have no fear of excess returns. |
|
| ▲ | whilenot-dev 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > No-questions-asked returns That's the Right of withdrawal[0] by EU law, though. Do you mean something else? I mean, sure, smaller shops might not cover the costs for the return shipping, but I don't really mind. [0]: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/ret... |
|
| ▲ | KPGv2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's probably different for everyone. For us, it's chiefly because it's the only place where we can find a gazillion things our kids' school demands they bring to school, and we can have it in twenty-four hours without having to drive to the store. I order books from a local indie bookstore and just wait a couple weeks for the books to show up from their wholesaler. But for other stuff, including tools, why wouldn't I just order from a place I already have free 2-day (often overnight) shipping for, when my alternatives are physical big box stores? Like why go to Lowe's to buy a cross-cut jig when I can get it delivered right to my house in 24 hours for the same price? It's not even like my money could possibly go to an indie hardware store. They don't exist. Certainly not within an hour of me, which not only requires my time, but also money in the form of electricity to drive my car, plus the wear and tear on my car. |
| |
|
| ▲ | mindslight 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Personally, the only webshop where I actually need so many returns is Amazon itself. Some of that is intrinsic to a good chunk of what they're selling (poorly described imports from the Chinese market). I just ordered an assortment of cabling for shuffling PCIe signals around. Apparently there are a few different "standards" for pinouts on SFF-8643 and SFF-8654, but nobody actually describes them in their product listings! So I'll see which ones work with what I already have, and with each other, and the rest can go back. Sellers could have avoided that by doing that work once and describing their items, but they'd rather I do it instead. So when I do it, I don't feel bad about the returns. But a lot of it is the dark patterns Amazon themselves choose to play. Nonstop pricing games make me push my actual purchasing decisions down the line. If something is on sale at a great price and I'm in the market, I'll just hit buy to lock in that price. I'll then try to do some research before it ships, but in general I've got 30+ days to make the actual purchase decision. This is what the seller must want, right? Or the same pricing games but after a purchase - if the price on something significantly drops, the answer I've gotten from CS is to buy a new one and return the old one. So if I already have other stuff I need to make a return trip for, that's what I do! Or when I'm in the middle of building/repairing something, especially when I don't have a "trial" of "prime" (aka sunk cost fallacy), I'll order a few different types of items I think I might need. This way when they show up in a week+ (Slow, Spiteful Shipping) and I'm back focusing on the project, there is less chance of "oh I really needed this other thing" and having to wait another round trip. With other web stores I just don't feel these type of dark pattern dynamics. Whereas Amazon is practically begging people to call their bluffs. So I call them. |
|
| ▲ | startup_zombie_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
|
| ▲ | iso1631 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I have never returned anything to amazon. Maybe it's a US culture thing. |