Remix.run Logo
▲ What Meta got right with Muse(metedata.substack.com)
75 points by young_mete 20 hours ago | 100 comments
▲tokepi 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A different view: https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/117325417843030902

> you better believe the other thing it's supposed to do aside from build a picture of your friends and loved ones is to figure out what makes you love to shop. This is actually some of the most nauseating prompt text i have ever read.

▲simoncion an hour ago | parent [-]

A quick note for folks who are going to go "duhhh, so what?" after reading that thread:

That investigation is still ongoing, and that subthread doesn't contain all the information from it. You should pop up to that -er- blog's top level, scroll back until you find the start of the investigation, and then start reading. Yeah, it's a huge pain in the ass, but this is -AFAICT- the guy's personal notepad, rather than some place where formal reports usually go. If someone walked over, picked up my personal notepad at $DAYJOB, and complained about how they couldn't make sense of it, I'd tell them to fuck right off, yanno?

▲artdigital 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The other day I signed up for Muse (through a VPN) just to see what all the fuss was about and I have to say it’s a really nice implementation of a personal assistant. It genuinely feels great and makes me want to use it!

It has a simple surface but you can dig deep, from customizing personality, rules, communication style, avatar, etc. You can even install Tailscale onto its VM to SSH into it, but sadly once the machine shuts down, the overlay resets and that’s gone. Couldn’t figure a way to persist it out yet. Still very cool to dig around and explore all the CLIs Meta created for Muse to interact with stuff, like instagram or facebook (you can scp them off the VM)

If I had to rank them I would say: Grok Bot -> Muse -> Hermes -> dot -> OpenClaw

I would love to use Muse more but same as everyone else, there’s no way I’m giving Meta more access to my life. So for now, my Muse is jailed to only Meta owned services and general research, and for that it’s great.

▲pavo-etc an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> explore all the CLIs Meta created for Muse to interact with stuff, like instagram or facebook (you can scp them off the VM)

oh this is cool. I would be very interested in a Facebook CLI

▲user_7832 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How'd you do it with a vpn? Doesn't it still need your facebook account to be from the US?

▲artdigital 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Nope, I just went to muse.ai and typed an email. It created a new Meta account with it and once you interact with Muse once you no longer need the VPN because the service itself gets added to your Meta account.

I then linked my Facebook, IG and others to this new Meta account so that Muse can access them.

No problems whatsoever

▲mandeepj 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

> I then linked my Facebook, IG and others to this new Meta account so that Muse can access them.

You completed the circle!

▲Craighead 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don't want to give Meta more access to your life but X is ok?

▲phoghed 14 minutes ago | parent [-]

It doesn’t say that. Just a ranking of the tools doesn’t imply that they are using Grok Bot.

In general though yeah X is probably less competent in the execution of manipulating you through insights from your data.

▲egl2020 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The privacy issue blocks me from adopting this or other personal assistants: do I want to give muse my identity data and access to my mail, calendar, and phone so it can do even basic tasks like make appointments or pay bills?

It will be interesting to see if muse's privacy features can get users over this.

▲mattbrewsbytes 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Meta's active user base doesn't care about privacy.

Most personal tasks take trivial amounts of time these days. Does a 5th grade teacher or an auto mechanic need a personal assistant? Do we need to be able to book a trip faster? It feels very gimmicky to me, but I realize I'm not their target audience.

Given that, I do think Meta will probably get the lions share of B2C AI and they have a proven track record of using personal data to serve ads and make a lot of profit. If they capture more of their user base's time, it keeps them engaged and away from a list of competitors. If Meta starts crushing it in this fashion I could see IPO's of OpenAI and Anthropic land like fart in church.

▲rolosa 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

I mean I just used muse to plan out my entire weekend trip to Vegas recently. I booked everything myself but I asked it to shortlist dining options for me given dietary restrictions, events given restrictions (with elderly family), etc. it basically handled all the stuff I would have normally just Google searched for. Plus it made a nice web app dashboard to display it all. It seems pretty useful for common use.

It also handled payment splitting. I told it what person x spent for the group split 3 ways (it originally split by the total number of people, but I clarified that only me + x + y are paying) and it kept running totals. When I got an email from Venmo saying x sent me money, muse automatically updated the balance sheet.

We saw some signs written in an unfamiliar language. Muse told me what language it was.

▲rienbdj 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There will come a point where the local models are good enough (and iPhones powerful enough) for this to be possible without privacy downsides.

▲thatsabadlook 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They are that good now. The computer is just too expensive. The computer is too expensive because of meta, openai, anthropic, grok, etc. it's funny how this works...

▲raz32dust 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A lot of use cases for agents require long running sessions. And you're likely to have many agent sessions running in parallel. These aren't going to be running on your personal devices

▲brabel 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I agree. I currently do run a bunch of dev containers on my local Docker but that is not good enough, they neeed to be able to work while I am on the run and close my laptop. So we are trying having personal containers on a managed Kibernetes cluster for every developer. We’re still working on making this work but it seems promising, the hardest thing being just permissions to let the agent use MCP servers, http APIs etc. If anyone has done this, how did you manage that?? I know there are products like OpenCLI that help with the problem but we want something we can build ourselves since AI makes it so much easier to build things!

▲devrwoody 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Use ai to build it a poc and read the code after, learn, rebuild until you find something that works.

I host all of my custom applications on a machine in my home with Tailscale, k8, infrastructure as code

It’s wired, always on, has access to my gpu running on another machine or falls back to cloud inference

Self hosted GitHub action runners on each different platform for build/deploy of various projects: tauri v2, apis, web uis, native macOS apps, Unity 3d

None of this existed a month ago and it’s been a blast pretending to run my own platform

▲ctolsen 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Durability and parallelism aren't that hard, and you won't be needing frontier models for much of this stuff. The parameter efficiency of models is increasing rapidly. I don't see why a (near-)future device wouldn't be capable of running a perfectly capable personal assistant.

▲spwa4 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why not? Why wouldn't your phone be able to do this?

The other advantage long running sessions have is that very low tok/s are perfectly acceptable. In fact, hardly noticeable.

(aside, of course, from Google and Apple both having incentives to prevent this from happening, as both depend on selling centralized services to you and advertisers, and the local model breaks both)

▲reacharavindh 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’m sure there is probably a skunkworks like team secretly working at Apple trying to make the hardware needed to accelerate local models enough to handle personal data processing needs without decimating the battery. I’d guess another team is probably tasked at researching a E2E encrypted remote inference mechanism where the personal data that does get out of the iPhone/ipad/Mac is encrypted with something Secure Enclave on processor, and “even Apple can’t read it”..

Apple is my long term bet for personal AI computing.

No way in hell am I letting FaceBook/OpenAI/Anthropic/Deepseek/anybody have complete access to my personal digital life. That’s just dumb.

Just look at OpenAI digging through ChatGPT logs to get the idea to solve the math problems etc. I’m sure all the subscription plans and subsidies are aimed at gathering enough breadth of real people comms to get the models to improve on wider signals…

Worst case, I don’t want to be voluntarily giving up my digital footprint to get profiled a certain way and be fed what AI overlords (or the companies that wield them really) think I should get as an answer/response.

My thoughts and activity stays private as much as practical and feasible.

▲r_lee 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> where the personal data that does get out of the iPhone/ipad/Mac is encrypted with something Secure Enclave on processor, and “even Apple can’t read it”..

there already is technology for this, which is Confidential Computing which is implemented on Nvidia etc.

it requires transparency to audit it properly and if there's an exploit which weakens it then the security guarantees fall apart

but in terms of commercial viability, it's the most promising way to tackle this and it seems like Apple is already pushing for it with their Private Cloud Compute

▲jayd16 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ok but look at the list... Google likely already has all that. It's not really something a normie cares about self hosting.

▲mistercheese 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I agree, most of the proactive agent assistance use cases requires me to give out data I’m hesitant to give like email, financial data, health data…

I’m hoping someone makes a lower maintenance version of open source Muse or Grokbot or Dots (more user friendly than OpenClaw or Hermes) that I can easily deploy to my own AWS, Cloudflare, Vercel, or Fly account and use some ZDR friendly inference provider like Fireworks.

▲thatsabadlook 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Absolutely. None of these tools are actually valuable unless you are down with all of your data being used against your interests short and long term.

"I can answer my emails 30s faster!" Cool but now meta knows everyone in your family's status, the bills you have, the Drs appts you have, your families health status, who services your loans, the emails you open the ones you don't, etc. it's a wet dream for surveillance capitalism and the mic subsidized by ignorant customers.

▲Adrig 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm a designer, but I admit it's really hard to predict what products and UX are going to work in the AI age.

Chatbots have been tried for a decade and were a total failure. With AI, it has become the fastest-growing way to interact with technology, ever.

GPT-5 tried to have an auto router and create abstraction for the user; people hated it. Instinct and Muse are doing the same with a different framing; it's going wild.

There are tons of these little examples where a small difference in framing, a small threshold in tech, and product assumptions completely flip on their heads.

It's amazing to follow but requires you to be way more flexible in your assumptions.

▲heaney-555 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The biggest mistake people make in this space is confusing the limitations of a specific implementation of a technology with fundamental flaws with the entire idea of said technology.

Once you recognize and overcome that thinking, and learn to distinguish between those two things, you can see where things are going.

▲young_mete 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think devil’s in the details on all of your examples, although I very much agree with your overall point - it’s so nuanced in terms of timing, current capabilities, etc.

Re: chatbots were tried but it’s a wrong model for a deterministic system. It’s the best one for a probabilistic one.

Re: chatGPT auto-router - 1) I suspect explicit model selection matters less in agentic contexts (this thing is coordinating a bunch of other agents for me) vs QA context where you want to make sure you’re getting the best answer. 2) I suspect auto-routing matters less now that models are way better

▲Adrig 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes definitely.

But I have to admit that in the design field we have a strong tendency to over-rely on "proper rules" and to overgeneralize learnings. (My pet peeve is when B2C patterns are transferred as-is in B2B or prosumers)

AI makes some old UX viable but can also unlock tons of value once you break your assumptions and reluctance. An example I see a lot here and on socials is how much of the code developers actually read nowadays. In the case of Instict, it is how many people actually share their credit card with an unknown startup's IA to buy stuff. I just heard on a podcast that 40% of them actually used their AI to buy something online (I didn't verify the %)

I'm the kind of guy who didn't understand why people use phones so much when a desktop is way more comfortable, so I have to keep track of the crazy ones!

▲tikimcfee 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Please don't try this software. Don't signal boost it. Don't provide feedback. Don't try to find "the good stuff about it". For the love of goodness stop calling it "Meta".

Facebook is not run or owned or operated by trustworthy individuals, and until such time as the greatest majority of their leadership if removed, the company's dissolution across its various sectors of global political control and influence ended - just stop giving it attention.

Please. I don't know how much more I can take of people demanding justice from a company that is only now being fined for sins of the past to a tune of meaningless dollars while also goofing "ooh shiny fun avatar that does an ai how useful!"

Please. Stop.

▲x______________ 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>Please don't try this software. Don't signal boost it. Don't provide feedback. Don't try to find "the good stuff about it".

A refreshing dose of sanity in this thread.

It feels that everyone is quick to forget the sins of these corporations.. akin to a toxic relationship and after breakup, you keep on going back for mote.

▲colesantiago 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Telling people to stop will just make people use it and explore it more (Rebel effect)

How are you going to 100% stop this?

You of all people should know this.

Let people use what they want to use.

▲r_lee 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

what's the point of saying all that?

you already know what will happen. if the model is good enough, people will use it.

you're asking for a lot of things here. I don't think most people take it that personally.

▲narmiouh an hour ago | parent [-]

If you haven't read "Careless People", you should. Peoples lives, governments, politics have been altered so facebook can grow and build its influence. The least one can do is to say all that.

▲AltruisticGapHN 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm tempted to try the free version as I'm curious what it is about.

Is this just a productivity thing?

Out of the top of my head I can't think of a lot of use cases but maybe RSS? Maybe I could ask it to give me a summary of cool tech news for each morning, and on very specific topics too?

Not sure what else I'd use it for.

▲laweijfmvo an hour ago | parent | next [-]

All it wants to do is buy stuff, book stuff, reserve stuff, do anything that indicates willingness to spend money. That’s what will get companies to sign on with Meta’s AI, so that’s what it will do.

Agents talking to Agents talking to Agents, spending our money. That’s the future Meta wants.

▲SiempreViernes 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

if you ask the model gently it'll give you root on the VM it runs in and you can install a bitcoin miner.

▲llm_nerd 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Serious question: Is all of the Muse noise actually organic, or is there a giant astroturfing campaign? Like John Gruber has endlessly talked about Muse since its dropped, often in a weirdly glowing fashion, and it's incredibly weird given that a) he is almost always hyper-critical of Meta, b) It isn't Apple, c) nothing about Muse is unique or novel or differentiating.

I don't get it. Is Meta handing out big $ for everyone to make Muse happen?

▲bix6 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Isn’t everyone a paid shill now? This is the influencer economy. Get influenced ya bishhhhh

▲taterbase 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you tried it?

▲llm_nerd 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

Of course not. Meta is a corrosive cancer on society, they are a disinformation torrent for an idiocracy, and they should be banned as government propaganda everywhere not named American America of America(Trump IncTM).

I cannot even deign to imagine someone trusting that company with an iota of their personal information, or that it would do anything constructive with it.

But I've seen enough people (presumably) astroturfing about it to know what their latest desperate "we matter" pitch is, and it just doesn't sound compelling at all. Certainly not to warrant the constant citations.

▲colesantiago 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes.

DF and their ilk, are irrelevant so they need to talk it up to get their blogs, and podcasts relevant again in the 'AI' conversation.

You would have thought that Gruber would be talking about their own expert subject matter i.e. Apple more, but since 2016 he has been going off the Apple expert opinion into Politics, Trump, AI, etc and not mainly (or exclusively) Apple.

I don't know why anybody still follows DF anymore as in the age of video, social media and podcasts the DF blog has fallen off.

That being said, on Muse, I will reserve my judgement there.

Wait till Meta's earnings to see if Muse has got any numbers to share to see if it made a difference.

▲whatsThisBtn4 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They compared codex with muse instead of OpenClaw?

Well I'm happy to know I'll have a job for a few years because this was incredibly weak.

▲TechRemarker 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"clunkiness of ChatGPT is stark. The whole desktop ChatGPT vs Codex switch is dumb. The chat vs work switch is dumb. ChatGPT projects vs Codex local vs Codex cloud projects is mega dumb. I need to make 10 choices each time I want to start or continue a chat. Just give me one chat that orchestrates all of it in the background." This times a 100x. Every step forward seems 2 steps back. The sidebar is jungle, and trying to find chats is tough, trying to remember if its codex or chat, a local one or remote, and that chat ones can't be put in a codex projects and countless other issues that make it a nightmare. While I can they are working on improving the mess to at least presumably get rid of the Chat vs Work toggle, I haven't heard anything that eventually it will just be one, where we can just toggle how it responds it, vs being limited on it can be organized and searched.

▲young_mete 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Then Tibo is on X asking things like “If we were to add one more sidebar, what should be in it”

▲youniverse 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Seems to me like they just copied Claude's distinction of Cowork because it sounded better to enterprises but it should never have been pushed to the userbase.

▲pvab3 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And you accidentally end up asking Astra Max what time the game is tonight or something stupid like that and it still has to finish and burn credits up

▲reafev 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Meta stupidly chose to open Muse only in the US. If anyone wants to take the world, just copy it, you have a month. (Before someone do it. Not Meta. They stick to dumb decisions)

▲swiftcoder 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> Meta stupidly chose to open Muse only in the US

I'm not sure to what extent they chose that, versus their privacy woes in the EU and elsewhere chose it for them. Turns out meta's reputation among US consumers is sparkling compared to their overseas reputation...

▲vovavili 3 hours ago | parent [-]

>Turns out meta's reputation among US consumers is sparkling compared to their overseas reputation...

I'd argue that this is more of a testament of how US regulatory regime facilitates consumer choice compared to paternalism of other major markets. I personally can't wait to have a free AI assistant like Muse available in my country.

▲georgeecollins 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

FB has a huge advantage launching any consumer app over any start up. Even ones that have higher valuations. If you think the market position isn't important, imagine what would happen if Apple changes their TOS such that Muse stops working as well on their devices. Or take it off the store because it's "dangerous".

▲young_mete 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Didn’t help Google, Apple, or Amazon to do the same even though they have market position and pre-existing AI products.

▲satvikpendem 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't understand Muse, couldn't agents already do all this? I have ChatGPT for example and I can have it book tickets and other things for me, it even pulls up a cloud browser if it can't access APIs. It can check for details from my email and use those for the ticket. Now OpenAI has Dots too which is a 24/7 version of the same thing.

▲nradov 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sure, it's nothing super unique but the way that Meta has put all the pieces together including security works really well in practice. Muse seems to be the best of the AI personal assistants for regular people right now.

▲hedora 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Does anyone believe the security works though? This is the company that brought us facebook, pervert glasses, and got sued by its E2EE content monitoring team (which apparently exists!) for emotional trauma because they had to read so much stuff from private WhatsApp messages.

▲nradov 14 hours ago | parent [-]

I believe that Muse security is about as good as any other large cloud environment. In the long run maybe all of them will eventually be hacked but so far my other Meta accounts have been 100% secure. So I'll take my chances with Muse because it saves me time and allows me to get more done.

Those other issues, while perhaps examples of bad corporate behavior, aren't really security lapses per se.

▲ninth_ant 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Meta has a long history of treating their user’s data recklessly. Cambridge Analytica being a prominent example.

They’ve also had a long history of using shady/deceptive practices to gather data, such as Onavo.

Is their internal security up to par with other cloud providers? Maybe. Security from them? Definitely not to be trusted.

(Former employee)

▲yellow_postit 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Grok as well seems to have a hit a sweet spot.

▲tiffanyh 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

UI/UX

Many times, UI/UX makes all the difference in user adoption & use.

▲satvikpendem 15 hours ago | parent [-]

But ChatGPT already has the same UI UX.

▲tiffanyh 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It isn’t though.

Muse is:

- a single thread

- has avatars that you can name

- has approval cards

Now dots is similar in concept but that only launched a few days ago and Muse launched a month ago.

▲young_mete 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It does not at all. ChatGPT is trying to be an everything app and it’s extremely convoluted by this point and hard for most people to make sense of, especially if you’re not in tech.

▲satvikpendem 14 hours ago | parent [-]

That's strange because they still have a billion users. So they're all using it somehow even without being in tech. The core UX is still a chatbot.

▲yellow_postit 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

OpenAI does now with Dots but it’s still desktop only so they flubbed the ease of use that has made Muse and Grok such growth engines.

▲LUmBULtERA 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not true, I use OpenAI's Dot on my phone all the time. It might need to be set up first on Desktop or web?

▲young_mete 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s also not free.

▲lanza 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't understand C, couldn't assembly already do all this?

▲bentcorner 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And dropbox is just rsync and some UI

▲kelvinjps10 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But chatgpt is still user friendly or claude I think also do these kinda of things

▲satvikpendem 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Difference being they're already largely similar so the analogy would be between C# and Java.

▲WhyNotHugo 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The article emphasises exactly what you said: technically it has no new features, it's just better UX than anything else, and more friendly to non-techies.

When it comes to being mainstream, an approachable UI sells

▲Anon1096 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is the Dropbox comment of the AI assistant era. At least it's not quite as out of touch.

▲satvikpendem 14 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I'm asking why ChatGPT isn't sufficient because they literally do the same thing unlike Dropbox vs rsync. In other words ChatGPT has the same UI UX but people flock to Muse for some reason.

▲brabel 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You clearly didn’t understand what Muse is if you think it’s the same. Do you understand “always on”? Try to learn what that means, so you will understand why ChatGPT chat is not that.

▲goatherders 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Facebook's install base is 3x that of cgpt

▲young_mete 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That’s pretty much the question the article tries to answer! TL;DR - good product design, personality mechanics, and ad-funded tokens is what makes it different.

▲iAMkenough 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Think of it as a Meta-hosted OpenClaw VM for each Facebook user.

Meta is reducing the friction for your parents to run OpenClaw without any assistance.

▲486sx33 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s the most consistent and user friendly agent with the ability to also be a harness for multiple custom agents. I literally had people running around the office amazed by muse last week. It has brought agents to the masses in a way a lay person can understand and use.

▲RagnarD 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Anyone trusting Zuck's company with deep personal data will deserve what they get.

▲fHr an hour ago | parent [-]

this

▲interestpiqued 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honestly I just think the fact that I don’t get spawned into a new chat every time I open it is an amazing. Simple and clean, AI seriously needs its Steve Jobs

▲prng2021 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

“Interestingly, what’s making Muse a success also explains why Google has mostly failed to capture the zeitgeist so far. They have the compute and the ad money to fund something like Muse. But they have no product chops to build something simple and understandable in consumer AI.”

Umm what? Having billions of hourly active users across YouTube, Google, Google Maps, and Chrome still doesn’t mean they have the product chops to build another consumer facing app/service? I think it’s inevitable that Muse will get crushed.

▲HotHotLava 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> YouTube, Google, Google Maps

Just yesterday I tried out Gemini again after a while, and it was not able to open Google Maps in navigation mode to the destination i wanted.

For the purposes of writing this comment, i asked it to put on some Jazz in Youtube (i have youtube music with a premium account on the same device and same google account) and it started a Spotify Jazz playlist.

Google might still have the popular products from 20 years of history, but after years of them trying there's no indication whatsoever that they have the ability to shape it into a coherent product.

▲dezgeg 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> YouTube, Google, Google Maps, and Chrome

You listed products that have been around for ~20 years. Keeping up already entrenched products running doesn't correlate with being able to launch new products.

▲young_mete 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Those are all quite mature products which they have maintained and grew super well. They haven’t had a good track record in consumer AI, there’s no coherent product strategy or offering. They had some localized hits like NotebookLM and nano banana but it hasn’t translated into organic growth and usage for Gemini

▲Anon1096 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Google Search and Google Maps are utilities, not consumer apps that vie for leisure time, so I don't think they are really comparable. The next frontier for AI apps like Muse and Dots is competing with the social media giants.

We should look to see how Shorts vs IG Reels have adapted to the short form video landscape for product chops in this area. IMO IG has adapted far better to the new era, and I very often get people sending me Reels (they used to send TikToks). I very rarely see anyone send Shorts but it still happens. I expect this trend to continue and IG to extend their lead here. And Muse certainly has first mover advantage in personalized AI apps, who knows when Google will finally release one.

▲nradov 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Google has huge amounts of training data but very little of it is relevant to creating an AI personal assistant with good UX for common tasks. Like Gemini might be really good at answering specific questions or generating synthetic content but that doesn't mean it can securely, reliably carry out workflows in a way that feels natural to regular users. At least for now, that part still requires some human vision and product management.

▲TiredOfLife 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Youtube and google maps are used because of content they have. As software they are awful.

▲iAMkenough 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I like that you can get root access to the VM your instance runs in, connect it to your tailnet, automate connection approvals, and operate a torrent seedbox on Meta’s infra.

▲artdigital 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Have you figured out a reliable way to persist stuff? Like a launch script or similar that doesn’t reset when the VM shuts down and can be used to restore tailscale

bashrc, bash profile, cron, systemd, etc all get wiped clean the moment the VM resets

▲iAMkenough 3 minutes ago | parent [-]

I have not done anything as I have not used Muse, but the space where Muse persists your collected information and OpenClaw skills can theoretically be used to create a watchdog skill that redeploys everything on its own.

https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/117329891435375465

▲Forgeties79 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Totally theoretical of course

▲iAMkenough 15 hours ago | parent [-]

right, it could be made up

https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/117329100531227330

▲Forgeties79 11 hours ago | parent [-]

I appreciate the edit

▲verdverm 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

perhaps its for plausible deniability next time they torrent training data /s

▲andrewstuart 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Metas Muse is a direct ripoff from me.

I freaked out when I saw Muse.

A few months ago I made this website when it occurred to me that I and friends were starting to hand their lives to AI:

Http://lifeos.nexus

It’s bizarre it’s almost exactly what Muse is - the characters even look like Muse.

One of my characters is NAMED Muse.

It’s deeply weird what a precise copy the concept is.

Have a look at this page then compare the characters to https://lifeos.nexus

https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/25/meta-is-putting-its-muscle...

▲x______________ 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> Metas Muse is a direct ripoff from me.

Maybe you should be addressing this to a law firm instead of a public forum?

▲Aboutplants 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you can design something that a Baby Boomer can understand, then you have a mass market product at full scale. Otherwise your hopefully building something that a niche group finds attractive and that grows from there, outwards to scale.

It’s boomers

▲nalekberov 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't get it. What muse does it better than others? it's just chat app connected to AI service.

▲fHr an hour ago | parent | next [-]

they already have all the stolen data so they can sell you more ads

▲albumen 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Did you read the article? Some suggestions there.