> I know, which is why I don't bother with lawns. I'd rather fill the entire area with solar panels instead.

Agreed. Or xeriscaping, or something better than grass (which is a really low bar to be better than).

The whole point of a city is to allow large numbers of people to live in close proximity to each other. Everything else is a choice.

> Absolutely. The whole point of a city is to reject all that.

I didn’t realize cities were made with a point to reject entropy and weren’t mostly organic congregations of people for economic reasons

You seem like you’re on your way to becoming a billionaire, which is one of the worst things I can imagine saying about someone.

Since when is naivety negative? You are born without knowledge. You acquire knowledge throughout existence. Seems pretty natural to me.

"Soul" means something has a story to tell. It was created for a purpose, it was useful, it may be near its end. There are very clear and obvious dimensions to it that help to immerse you into the game. Details to pick up on, some obvious and some not so obvious.

The opposite, where everything is very clearly manicured, created, is so far from reality that the immersion is more difficult to achieve, or is quickly lost. You never stray far from the fact that you're playing a city game with very rigid rules.

I think this is what the author means by "Soul": objects with details to show something lived, was paid attention to, has story, depth, and scars to prove it.

+1. Some of the added detail (e.g. more realistic-looking brick) looked great. Some of it was the kind of thing that better depicts "areas you've failed to maintain", iff you want your simulator to have those bits of verisimilitude.

I'd be all for separating "better, more lifelike, more realistic rendering, with interesting variation" from "decay".

big flat rectangles isnt less detail. ive seen plenty of lots that look exactly like that with the surface being sort of a grippy stucko. adding detail would be texturing it to show the grit better

breakdown and maintenance is a part of life, and if you want a city to look like it spends a million a month per block on maintenance, thats fine to have as a fantasy for a game. Youre playing a game, entropy doesnt have to apply.

the post is right though, city games always put a layer of fantasy over one of the major costs that a city has - maintenance.

i havent played one since sim city 3k, but i expect theres still no setting up snow clearance routes and how changing the order or amount of plows affects traffic, along with the associated costs to the city.

I think it could be tastefully done. Even well–maintained objects age in real life, and that is often part of the charm.

Consider the 115 year old brick building in a town I used to live in, with the faded remnants of a 50 year old replica of the sign painted on the side by the butcher’s shop that originally owned the building.

> It's a problem to be solved, not something to be added in deliberately.

Yes, it's romanticizing decay to add thematic and realistic problems to games.