Current Toyota engines - several years in production already - used in hybrids have 40% thermodynamic efficiency, new Chinese engines (Geely and BYD) - 45% and soon coming out Toyota engine is claimed to hit 50%. With the numbers like this the hybrids ( and plugins, given the falling prices and increasing charge/weight density of the batteries) seem to still have a long and profitable path forward.

Granted it may result in Toyota losing the battle in the long run. On the other hand any large improve in batteries may gradually bring Toyota into EV world just by letting to upsize the plugins' batteries.

Personally i like very much my 2015 Prius Plugin, and the only thing i'd want about it is to have additional 20KWh of batteries (may be one day i'll throw them in myself :)

▲

freetime2 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I drive a Toyota PHEV and love it. All of my daily driving is EV, and then I switch it into hybrid mode on the weekends for longer trips. Hybrids/PHEVs are great.

But I would much rather be doing all of my driving in EV mode. I just think it's going to take another generation of battery improvements before we start seeing affordable 3-row MPVs (which is what I drive) with decent range. The VW Buzz and Kia PV5 have well under 300 miles range, for example.

China does have some pretty awesome looking EV MPVs like the Zeekr 009, which supposedly gets up to 500 miles range. But that won't be available here any time soon.

Improvements in charging speed and improved charging infrastruture will also help a lot.

▲

trhway 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> Zeekr 009

"Dual-motor variants produce up to 603–789 horsepower (450 kW to over 580 kW), delivering rapid acceleration comparable to sports sedans"

speaking about anemic minivan for soccer moms...

▲

SturgeonsLaw 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Almost 800 horsepower is anemic? That's the same territory as a Porsche 911 Turbo S

	▲	freetime2 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I think it was a joke

▲

wildzzz 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

one guy did build a Hellcat Chrysler Pacifica but it really was just a body swap.

▲

dieortin 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Very impressive for a combustion engine, but still way worse than the ~90% efficiency of a battery electric car

▲

trhway 7 hours ago | parent [-]

If your electricity comes from hydro, solar, wind - yes. If your electricity comes from fossil fuels - best power plant efficiency 60% - then not really. In US fossil fuels generate 60% of all the electricity.

▲

dieortin 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

90% * 60% = 54%, which is still way better than the most efficient internal combustion engines. So even in that case an EV is still better. Plus, it gets greener when the grid gets greener.

	▲	xedrac 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm not super concerned about green energy, but i put solar panels on my roof and charge an ev because it's incredibly practical and a much better experience than the status quo.

▲

speedstyle 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Much less than 100% of electricity is... still more efficient than ICE? I don't see how that changes things.

US electricity averages 384g CO2/kWh, so EVs emit 100-130g/mile, equivalent to 90-110mpg. And that improves year on year, while an ICE is at best as efficient as when it was produced

▲

trhway 3 hours ago | parent [-]

while a very important aspect (and you're right that EV are more and more better on that), that isn't strictly thermodynamic efficiency you're talking about. For example, natural gas is a major fuel for electricity generation and, even at the same efficiency, it produces less CO2/KWh than say gasoline.

	▲	angry_octet 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Methane (natural gas) is a powerful greenhouse gas, much more insulating that CO2. Leakage of methane during production and transport will have a huge impact over the short term (next 50 years). It is actually way worse than gasoline or coal for that reason. By the time all the CH4 we are dumping into the atmosphere has broken down (half life ~12 years) we will have pushed global temperatures much higher.

▲

fpoling 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

50% power efficiency is for burning gasoline, not oil. Once accounting for energy spent on refining oil into modern gasoline it is like 35%. And with that it will consume less oil to burn it on modern power plant approaching 50% efficiency even accounting for refinery losses and then use that in EV.

▲

TheOtherHobbes 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If your power comes from fossils it's already been shipped half way around the world and refined, so that should be included in any efficiency calculation.

▲

taneq 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you’re going to use the “well to wheels” number for electricity then you should do the same for ICE vehicles.

Also, 40% of U.S. power generation is renewable? Impressive!