Remix.run Logo
jamesponddotco a day ago

With SourceHut banning projects that use LLMs[1], I’m looking to migrate this weekend.

While I can host Forgejo just fine[2], doing so means no one will be able to contribute to the projects, since federation isn’t a thing yet. Heck, getting contributions on SourceHut was hard enough, and it doesn’t even require people to register an account.

I might need to bite the bullet and go with GitHub. Regardless of what I think about the company and Microsoft, it’s where the people are.

[1]: https://sourcehut.org/blog/2026-08-27-tos-changes-and-llms/

[2]: And already do locally, as a mirror to SourceHut.

mistahchris a day ago | parent | next [-]

Oh my. I hadn't noticed this, but I've been kind of expecting it. I've been a big SourceHut user for years now. So I'll be having to decide what to do myself. I absolutely get their stance, but I don't see a world in which I will go back to writing meaningful amounts of code by hand again.

I may try out tangled.sh. It's really nice to have my code stored and backed up somewhere other than infra I control and manage.

packetlost 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm personally pretty excited about Tangled (and ATProto in general), but I do have to caution that I've had some performance issues and some technical ones with hosting my own 'knot' and 'spindle' services

bradley_taunt a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Codefloe looks like it could be promising. No real restrictions like other options. Time will tell.

https://codefloe.com/

megagpt1 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can't they either sign up for accounts on your Forgejo, or send you an IM to request a pull?

oscarcp a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It ridiculous, Codeberg did the same. I get why, really, I do, but it's creating a severe damage that will be abused by a third evil actor that will take over the wasteland of GitHub and GitLab by creating a service that will allow anything (until it is enshittified of course)

Outcome? Everyone on their own self-hosted git servers, zero collaboration.

megagpt2 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What kind of collaboration were you getting on your random GitHub uploads? I didn't get any. This collaboration thing seems like an excuse if people have a way to contact you.

Codeberg only banned projects that are majority LLM-coded. They did not ban all use of LLMs.

dmix a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> Outcome? Everyone on their own self-hosted git servers, zero collaboration.

Everyone sticking to Github, then a year or two from now Github resolves their scaling issues and the competitors miss their window of opportunity to disrupt

oscarcp a day ago | parent [-]

Not if they keep putting everything behind a paywall. I'm not going to pay 60 (20/user/month) euros per month to be able to restrict pushes to main. It's absurd. Sorry, this specifically gets my blood boiling so I might be a bit more aggressive than needed.

ranger_danger a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Vervis and Radicle both support federation.

https://codeberg.org/ForgeFed/Vervis

https://radicle.dev/

throwawayfile a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]