Remix.run Logo
bayindirh 4 hours ago

I know, this is a bit of a meaningless comment, but it's funny in a way. Feels like late 90s again:

    - Xiaomi: We have matched Apple in CPU performance.
    - Apple: *Meep Meep...*
derwiki 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Reading Infinite Games, they tell an anecdote about a Microsoft exec on a flight telling an Apple exec that the Zune was a way better portable music player than the iPod. The Apple exec was just “yup, you’re probably right” and then soon after the iPhone dropped

VCFundedGenYer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

To be fair, the Zune actually was a better media player than the ipod in almost every way. That wasn't a false statement.

The issue was the abysmal marketing and "me too" attitude Microsoft had (and still has).

saturn8601 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I recall reading this story of some user doing a sync with Zune on their new computer. The computer had no songs on it and the Zune synced with that machine and wiped all the existing music off his Zune without warning him(or something like that its been years). I recall thinking, yep thats Microsoft. And to this day I still encounter dumb ways of thinking in many of their products. The endless negative stories I hear about Windows 11 are just the tip of the iceberg. The entire company has to be following a cohesive vision with leadership at top needing to be truly involved to make great end to end products and really Microsoft has not been that in a long time.

hex4def6 5 minutes ago | parent [-]

I remember Microsoft introduced a DRM / certification program they called "Playsforsure".

Two years later they introduce the Zune, which could not play "Playsforsure" music people had purchased from MSN..

gffrd an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Technical capability pales in comparison to human desire.

sigmoid10 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Until you actually need to run a business. Then money is much more important than the preferences of your employees. That's why Apple has barely penetrated the business world beyond overfunded startups that are more driven by hype and design wanna-bes than actual profit.

foepys 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Microsoft fumbled the Windows ball so hard, everybody i know got rid of their Windows PC and either went to Android/iPhone or got a Mac or Linux.

At work we can freely choose which OS we run on our machines. Guess what everybody wants since IT got forced to upgrade each laptop to Windows 11? Macbook Pro.

I personally am running Linux just because I already know how to use it but macOS (despite its flaws) is way less intrusive and much faster than Windows. Even Microsoft's own programs (Office 365, Teams) are running faster and have better UX on macOS than on Windows.

saturn8601 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

One can argue they made much more money selling to people than business. Business forces you to compete on price and that drives everything down to 0. The market clearly values selling to people more than selling to business: look at their stock price. So if you are actually running a computer company wouldn't it be better if you took Apple's approach (if you could)?

badprose 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

> Until you actually need to run a business. Did you mean to say "Until you actually need to sell to a business."? They did do very well for a long time mostly by focusing on consumers...

Razengan an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Being easy and pleasant to use and own is also an important capacity.

tcmart14 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Never had a zune, but I did have an iPod. I am willing to accept Zune was superior. But its just an example that, yea, often times the superior solution doesn't actually win. There is a huge list of better technology that lost out to worst technology. Which is why I find it funny the claim that the market is optimal in choosing winners and loosers.

insane_dreamer an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I had the first iPod, and later the first Zune. The Zune had a beautiful UI, but by then Apple came out with the iPod Nano 2nd gen and that took the cake.

wat10000 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It was better in every way you can quantify in a tech specs listing, and not in any way that actually matters to the customer.

georgel an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I had the OG white Zune. It was the same price as an iPod ~$250. The reason I chose Zune was the Zune Pass. A precursor to Spotify. Plus growing up in the Seattle area, I knew other people who had them and we would trade songs.

Andrex an hour ago | parent [-]

I completely forgot you could "squirt" songs to other Zune owners. What a time!

(Brown launch model here.)

stillpointlab an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

100% - the iPod wasn't just good enough, it was more than enough for almost everyone. The Zune was firmly in the diminishing returns category by the time it came out.

compiler-guy an hour ago | parent [-]

Yep. To overcome an incumbent that sells a very good product and has momentum, it is almost never enough to be somewhat better. You have to be "knock my socks off" better.

The Zune may have been somewhat better (until the nano and iphone), but it wasn't enough better to overcome the ecosystem switching costs.

jimbokun an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not much difference between storing as many songs you can listen to in a lifetime, or storing twice as many songs as you can listen to in a lifetime.

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
aatd86 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

me still thinking about the iRiver H320 I was lusting after...

2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
riazrizvi an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The Zune failed vs the iPod because of marketing? Okay.

QuercusMax 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

The turd brown color certainly didn't help

horsawlarway 24 minutes ago | parent [-]

shut your mouth - that brown was beautiful.

shuwix an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Actually, Microsoft came with "modern" smart phone much sooner. Actually too soon, technology wasn't there (price, computing power, size, weight, battery life).

Apple never came first ... but often just at the right moment and had marketing skills to make it a new trend.

skrebbel an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I'm the opposite of an Apple fanboy (typing this on a Windows box), but this is some grade A nonsense.

Sure, MS launched PDAs and phone-ish devices long ago, running Windows CE and whatnot but they were awful. It's absolute bollocks that the iPhone was a splashing success because of Apple marketing. It was a splashing success because it worked spectacularly well. Random non-tech people would randomly pull out their newest purchase to show their friends. "And now it's a notepad!" "Look and now suddenly it's a calculator!" Sure, your awful HP Tablet had all that, and a call function, well before. But it sucked. It felt like using a computer while squinting, and not like a magic calculator that can turn into a notepad and then into a phone and then into an iPod.

The iPhone was a success because it worked so well. And it worked so well because the technology was there - in part because they invented it and in part because they had the taste to not bring out a shit product but wait a bit instead.

philistine an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This shorthand that marketing means a bad thing is actually not true for Apple. Apple's marketing is how it ought to be at every company. They do market research to figure out what users need, they famously came up with the iPod's click wheel, they don't just do the ads. Of course Apple is eminently critiquable, but its marketing division is what everybody should do.

oasisbob 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Kin was pretty cool. Very usable with cheap hardware and cheap data plans. If the timing was a bit different, Microsoft might not have been tempted to commit infanticide.

shuwix an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Reading with understanding is absent in your skillset.

I exactly wrote that Microsoft devices were quite bad as they came too soon. And Apple came at the right moment, when low power chips were powerful enough, touchscreens were precise enough without a pen. And device had acceptable consumption, batteries had decent capacity, lifespan.

nitin7 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Imagine having to go to Start - Programs - Phone, in order to make a call.

qlte 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

Sure, I can imagine it. But I had a Windows Mobile phone and definitely didn't need to do this, there was a Phone button on the start screen.

__alexs an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Windows CE (1996) was garbage compared to Palm OS (also 1996.)

0x457 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Years after the first iPhone release, Microsoft had a dogshit mobile OS, and every single device using it was dogshit. Before Android, the industry's answer to iOS and iPhone was a resistive touch screen and stylus because, other than the launcher, absolutely nothing was adapted to fingers. That was if you were lucky; some didn't include a stylus, reducing usefulness for making calls. It was like running regular Windows applications scaled down to a smartphone screen.

NoMoreNicksLeft an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

>Apple never came first ... but often just at the right moment and had marketing skills to make it a new trend.

Newton.

bingo-bongo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Simon Sinek - Apple vs Microsoft: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jEOftmUJ6a4

But it had nothing to do with the iPod/iPhone release in his story.

(story starts ~1:15, but I highly recommend the entire talk)

mikestew 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Might want to edit, as this would make sense/be amusing if the exec in the last sentence was Apple.

That, or I can’t read.

derwiki 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You got it, thank you!

nxobject 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Hell hath no fury like Apple Global Security scorned...

mark_l_watson an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I loved the book The Infinite Game. Really changed how I looked at work, personal research, and being an author. Recommended!

troupo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Zune was probably a better player. It was too late, and arrived when MS didn't much care.

There are emails unearthed in various lawsuits where you can read Bill Gates screaming at his subordinates: "why the hell can't our partners like Sony and Creative create a similar device? Give them all, give them early access to everything, work with them". In the end MS felt compelled to make their own.

bayindirh 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sony can't be bothered to compete with Apple in that era. They were trying to recover from their DRM dreams, and their devices were already sounding great with in-house software and hardware.

Creative's Muvo^2 already was the poor man's iPod with surprisingly good audio quality as well.

cptskippy 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I feel like this completely misses the mark. Audio quality was never the compelling feature of the iPod and people weren't clamoring for it because it sounded good.

When the iPod came out you largely had two options for carrying your music collection on the go. You either carried a binder of CDs, or you had some niche player like Mini-Disc or an MP3 player. Both alternatives were expensive and had limitations similar to a CD in terms of number of tracks you could carry.

I had an MP3 player on either side of 2000 that was slightly smaller than a deck of playing cards that could use Smart Media flash memory cards. The largest card at the time was either 16 or 32mb and was enough to hold 1 album at near CD quality.

Creative's Muvo was a weird form factor that was larger than an iPod. It had a horrid interface both on device and for loading music. It's only grace was that it was slightly cheaper than an iPod and didn't need a Mac with FireWire. Although iircc this was pre USB 2.0 so not having FireWire would mean loading music took forever and a day.

The iPod allowed you to carry most, if not all, of your music collection in a package slightly larger than a deck of playing cards. And it had a fantastic interface for navigating music on the device.

This was at a time before most people had laptops and if you had a PC it was at home and used sparingly. The iPod was such a compelling mobile computing device that it drove adoption of the iMac. Apple would eventually release iTunes for Windows and USB support but that was many years later.

thewebguyd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> I had an MP3 player on either side of 2000 that was slightly smaller than a deck of playing cards that could use Smart Media flash memory cards. The largest card at the time was either 16 or 32mb and was enough to hold 1 album at near CD quality.

I had something similar. The storage was the iPod's killer feature, along with iTune's $0.99 songs. Suddenly you no longer had to buy whole albums, and you didn't have to swap out what was on your MP3 player every day when you wanted a different playlist. A 5GB hard drive in your pocket was a huge innovation then.

fckgw 2 hours ago | parent [-]

"1000 songs in your pocket" was the entire driving force behind the thing. It was constantly bellowed in the marketing and it's what Steve Jobs demanded of the engineering team from day one. The size and the storage were paramount and they knew no one else could match it.

peezd 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yep this was really it. The amount of storage on the ipod was amazing and just opened up the idea that "yes you put your full music collection on it".

jonhohle 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I had a Rio Volt which somewhat bridged the gap. 700MB mp3 CD/RWs (about 10 hours of music per disc) and a CD player when traveling and picking up new music. Not as small as an iPod, but no book of CDs was necessary, either.

cosmic_cheese 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Zune was probably a better player.

In some ways, anyway. Never owned a Zune myself, but a university classmate did and I was shocked by how poorly it handled non-Latin languages… she had a ton of Japanese and Korean songs loaded onto it, and their metadata all displayed as "missing character" blocks. She used it a lot like one might use an iPod Shuffle despite it having a nice screen because the only way to tell what was playing was by hearing it play.

By contrast my 4th gen B&W iPod which was about 5-6 years older handled unicode just fine.

VCFundedGenYer 2 hours ago | parent [-]

IIRC the Zune had a much better DAC on the device than any ipod. I own two of them and the sound quality was always notably great.

unsupp0rted 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It let you squirt over a song to your friend

https://youtu.be/ud6rwVkbovA

And they could listen to it 3 times in 3 days

ralfd an hour ago | parent [-]

“Squirting” was ridiculed at the time and the word itself scaring away women. Jobs killed it then in an interview with a classic quote: Microsoft = Cold tech and Apple = Humanity. MS scares her away, Apple gets the girl.

> QUESTION: Microsoft has announced its new iPod competitor, Zune. It says that this device is all about building communities. Are you worried?

> Steve Jobs: In a word, no. I’ve seen the demonstrations on the Internet about how you can find another person using a Zune and give them a song they can play three times. It takes forever. By the time you’ve gone through all that, the girl’s got up and left! You’re much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you’re connected with about two feet of headphone cable.

yard2010 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I just want to take a minute and be grateful for getting the chance to live through the 90s again. I always felt a bit sorry for myself being a child through the og 90s. Now I feel like in a decade or so into the future I will look back and be happy I got to live in the naïve days of windows 95 again, as an adult this time. I really appreciate it.

reaperducer 2 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Xiaomi: We have matched Apple in CPU performance.

Apple: Meep Meep...

This seems to happen repeatedly.

Apple: Look at this cool new chip!

Others: Look how we very slightly passed Apple (six months later, with worse thermals and power consumption)

Apple: Look at this even cooler new chip!

forinti 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Cheap RAM in 500 yards. ->

RankingMember 4 hours ago | parent [-]

[apparent tunnel to cheap RAM painted on rock face]

bayindirh 4 hours ago | parent [-]

...and Apple zooms through it like it's a real tunnel.

VCFundedGenYer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Seems most computer companies are still boasting that they can beat the M1 and it's like...congrats on beating a 6 year old chipset?

bob1029 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I still have zero urgency in upgrading from my M1 MBP.

rconti 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Same. My personal laptop is an M1 Air and I also have an M1 Studio desktop. My work machine is an M4, and in "regular" use I can't tell the difference between them.

ant6n 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don’t get that sentiment. I have an m4 16gb and it’s such a sluggish machine. and that’s not even doing development, just browsers, word, excel, PowerPoint. (And so many eternal bugs… I feel like I’m on windows)

georgel an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I have an M2 Pro MBP 16GB, compared to the latest MBP issued by my employer a couple months ago, I see zero difference in real world performance. Can’t speak for Office on Mac, I have not used it in over a decade, but for typical full stack web dev I literally don’t need anything more.

omnimus an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

You better check health of your machine then.

bryanlarsen 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's been really weird reading laptop reviews over the last few months. I've seen a bunch of reviews where they have their usual bar graphs comparing a bunch of laptops, and the laptop that is at the bottom is an Apple. It's the really inexpensive Neo, of course, but even the M5 laptops are consistently beat on performance and battery life by Intel Windows laptops.

I assume the M6 will take the crown back and then a few months later Intel/AMD will release a new chip and take that crown back again. That's the state of the world we used to expect, but it's a state that has been missing ever since the release of the M1 in 2020 until Intel finally caught up again this year.

dbspin 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> even the M5 laptops are consistently beat on performance and battery life by Intel Windows laptops.

When plugged in... This caveat is so enormous it should almost be legislated. If your computer use is at all portable, a computer that scales down to 20 - 40% of GPU power when unplugged is an enormously significant factor. So far as I'm aware (could be wrong about arm devices?) there's no non-apple laptop that operates at 100% speed on the road.

doomroot13 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Newer Intel Panther Lake chips perform the same or very similarly on battery as they do when plugged in - as do Qualcomm chips. However, I don't know where they're seeing "consistently beat on performance and battery life by Intel Windows laptops". Multi-core performance can definitely beat M5 in some configurations but single core performance is still fairly far behind and battery life is comparable again depending on the exact specifications and design of the laptop. I've seen analysis showing M5 is still the perf/watt king though regardless of configurations.

bryanlarsen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Sorry, poor wording. It's the Neo that's on the bottom in many reviews, but the M5 is regularly beaten by Windows laptops. My usage of "consistently" was in the sense of regularly beaten, not in the sense of always beaten.

senordevnyc 3 hours ago | parent [-]

So…inconsistently?

bryanlarsen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

So consistently beats the M5 on something, just not on everything.

bryanlarsen 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you tried Panther Lake or Wildcat Lake laptops?

3 hours ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
inigyou 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Jesus, they're still calling their chips Lake? As in Skylake? As in 2012?

someothherguyy a minute ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/decoding-intel-code-names

5 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
fhn 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Jesus, why does it matter? Don't you still have your name since birth? How lame!

inigyou an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Because the naming convention was used for chips based on Skylake microarchitecture (but with other differences such as process node). Not changing the name implies they've either changed the naming convention (why?) or they haven't improved the microarchitecture since 2012.

2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
adgjlsfhk1 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Apple also is faster when plugged in

dbspin 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Citation needed. I've owned Apple laptops for many years - and I'm a video editor (amongst other things). If this is the case it's new behaviour.

addaon 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This is a difference between selecting Highest or Automatic for performance under the battery menu item.

Topfi 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> [...] but even the M5 laptops are consistently beat on performance and battery life by Intel Windows laptops.

Hold up, in what metric/benchmark? Feel personally like we life in an age where, no matter the SOC vendor, something high performant and efficient is offered, so seeing a claim that any vendor, be it Intel, AMD, Qualcomm or Apple, is consistently outperforming another, I'd like to get more context on that.

achenet an hour ago | parent [-]

It seems logical in this case.

Intel were x86, Apple Silicon is ARM-based. ARM-based chips are more power-efficient.

Also, it's built on a much smaller process. 3nm, if I'm not mistaken, older Intel was something bigger than 10nm. Heck, if you take a really old Intel Mac, you have something like 65nm process, which is much less efficient than 3nm.

Here's a random benchmark I found on the internet (literally the first thing on Google, you can find more if you want) https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-intel_core_i7_1065...

Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It's the really inexpensive Neo, of course, but even the M5 laptops are consistently beat on performance and battery life by Intel Windows laptops.

Of course you can beat the entry level MacBook Neo by comparing it to larger, more powerful, more expensive laptops.

The M5 is an entire family with a range of performance. Intel/AMD have done a lot to improve performance but they’re not beating the high end M5 chips on performance or battery life yet.

bryanlarsen 2 hours ago | parent [-]

You can also beat the Neo on every measure by comparing it to $700 Windows laptops. https://www.tomshardware.com/laptops/dell-xps-13-2026-review

It's also not hard to find a Windows laptop that beats the M5 on battery life. Single-thread performance is the only remaining measure where the M5 is king.

code_duck an hour ago | parent [-]

Build quality, keyboard and displays are consistently reviewed as being nicer for the Neo than that price range of windows laptops.

f6v 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> but even the M5 laptops are consistently beat on performance and battery life by Intel Windows laptops

The real question is whether all these Intel Windows laptops spin their fans at full speed when doing absolutely nothing. That’s something I can never go back to. I do some light gaming on my M2 Pro MBP and it gets hot when trying to push 120 fps. But my Lenovo Legion (that’s now collecting the dust) is so loud I could hear it through headphones.

bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

x86 is way more complex when compared to ARM processors, as a result their TDP is way higher when you request performance from them.

Intel had to reduce the frequency of their processors when running AVX2 instructions and the AVX2 frequency of the processors were non-disclosable to anyone.

Also, benchmarking Intel processors and publishing these numbers were forbidden in some cases. I don't know whether this ban is still in effect.

x86 processors can't keep up with the ARM processors TDP and thermal profile wise. So they slow down a ton when running on battery. See Jeff Geerling's last video on Apple Neo vs. some Intel laptop. It's as "efficient", but slow as a newborn tortoise learning to walk when unplugged and trying to get the most endurance out of the battery.

My M1 Mac gets almost 2 days of low-intensity use after ~6 years of use, and it got warm once or twice because something ran away in the background for tens of minutes.

Topfi 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Being mistaken on the CISC vs RISC debate (besides, modern x86 is closer to RISC via micro-ops then old school CISC) is understandable. There is a lot of misinformation out there and myths, plus, it just feels right to consider CISC overly burdened, etc. TLDR: Intel x86_64 is closer to RISC then you likely think and Apple Silicon arm is closer to CISC then you likely think. These lines are blurry and have been for decades, very much for good reason.

But talking this authoritatively on something without doing the reading, that's grating: https://chipsandcheese.com/p/arm-or-x86-isa-doesnt-matter

bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> But talking this authoritatively on something without doing the reading, that's grating...

Thanks for your prejudice on me without knowing anything about me. In short, I'm a HPC sysadmin and programmer who works in a HPC center, separated from the actual hardware by a couple of floors.

We can discuss how transistors' heat generation doesn't discern about ISAs or being in a DAC or a cutting edge microprocessor, and we can even discuss how implementation of some functional blocks generate heat regardless of the ISA being involved. If you want we can discuss how saturating memory controllers affect pipeline saturation in processors even...

But talking this authoritatively on something with that amount of prejudice, that's grating.

aaa_aaa 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But still, your point was AFAIK already dismissed long ago.

Topfi 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

After that comment, why does it matter where you work?

bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Because being too confident about someone you don't know is a bad habit. Where I work doesn't matter though, but what I do is.

Pointing me to C&C is a nice touch though. Not only I read the site and very article you sent me before, I used to consume Anandtech before that.

As a mere mortal, I can make mistakes and gladly accept them, but I can't accept rude replies. Pardon my French, but being called a low-key liar or smoke blower gets me a little upset.

Topfi 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> Pointing me to C&C is a nice touch though. Not only I read the site and very article you sent me before, I used to consume Anandtech before that.

All I'll say is, that's worse then. Presuming you had not read up before promoting a long disproven myth, that was an assumption by me, I'll admit that and maybe I should not have done that, my mistake. But it was a gracious mistake, it was done in your favour, it was giving you credit.

PUSH_AX 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Apple is like the Billy Mitchell of computing. Just waited for them to beat it before announcing the gains they were sitting on.

inigyou 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Does this imply they faked all their benchmarks?

pavlov 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In the ‘90s it was the opposite.

- Apple: We have matched Intel in CPU performance thanks to this new PowerPC! (Shows ad that uses carefully handpicked benchmarks to suggest that the PowerPC is actually faster when it really isn’t on average)

- Intel: Oh, we just found a 30% clock rate increase in the pocket of our other fab pants.

- AMD: Hold my beer, I have the DEC Alpha guys making an x86 CPU… How about 64-bit while at it.

bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I said late 90s though. The insanity which poured through early 2000s.

5.25GHz Pentium 4s, intentionally lower binned Athlons, the era your CPU got obsoleted the moment you booted it for the first time.

I don't remember early 90s much. I was too young back then. I don't remember much stuff from that era. But late 90s, early 2000s.

Oh, boy.

P.S.: AMD64 was a great sucker punch though. One of the professors in our university rejected to believe and got mad when he learnt that Intel licensed AMD64 from AMD, heh.

0x457 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I had a G4 MacBook when I switched to the first-gen Intel MacBooks, and subjectively, the G4 performed much, much better. Probably because the best pairing for any Intel CPU is thermal throttling.

qwertytyyuu 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Echos of the ai race as well haha

chvid an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The US “export controls” what Chinese companies can buy at TSMC.

ajross 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

To be fair, this kind of dominance is not unprecedented. Intel was even further ahead in the early 2000's. Every new competitor process was further behind the leading edge and not closer. TSMC started launching half nodes like 28nm just to have something in the market that would sell.

But then you started to see the cracks. New competitors would launch new products with very slightly better metrics than Intel's older stuff, just to be, heh, meep-meeped at the next press conference. But the overlap was real, if small. And it grew over time until everyone looked up around the 5nm node and realized Intel had lost.

That's where we are right now with Apple. "Funny in a way", sure. But history says this is more likely to be the beginning of the end. Everything goes in cycles.

Gud 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Except in the 90s, I could wield my OS of choice on the hardware I bought.

bayindirh 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That's sadly true though. Also booting something was really simple.

Now we boot an embedded microcontroller (or CPU) which boots the main CPU which boots another OS semi-persistently to boot the main OS (if it's allowed).

Sometimes there are other processors needs to be up to allow processor to continue booting as well (these are mostly servers, but eh).

handbanana_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Haha, late 90s wasn't really like that though

mr_toad 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Apple levelled up in the middle of a fight.

Zylokloto 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I do not find it funny tbh.

I'm very very surprised that Xiaomi matches Apples speed even with the newest release, its not diminishing Xiaomis success.

Schiendelman 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

They didn't. It's an off the shelf chip, the threads on that post dismantled it pretty thoroughly as a false claim.

giwook 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's interesting to see how defensive some of these pro-China posters get on HN and elsewhere. I'm genuinely curious why there seems to be an inferiority complex here with respect to America/American companies.

yipinwong 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

China follows foot-in-the-door tactic per the Art of War. (done in HK, Korea, Singapore, and Malaysia)

This in-turn later on, AIs will train to make pro-China comments as AIs train on these.

They got the sheer man-power, and with AIs it's even easier.

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
Zylokloto 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not a pro-china poster, i'm from germany and didn't find this 'funny'.

Apple is the second richest company on the world (which doesn't need help/protection?!) and they have experts in chip design.

Xiamoi is some random chinese company not known for high end chips and was able to catch up impressivly in a short period of time.

This fact doesn't get funny or wahtever just because apple brought out a new chip today.

I'm not a fanboy for any of it and do not care.

Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Xiamoi is some random chinese company not known for high end chips and was able to catch up impressivly in a short period of time

Xiamoi is a huge company and is a commonly known brand. They’ve been making chips for a long time. They didn’t start a few months ago and catch up with Apple on their first try.

vkazanov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> random chinese company

Oh i have soooo many news for you!

inigyou 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are they well known in China? I'm seeing that Chinese tech has decoupled from the West. They have all this cool stuff that we do not hear about because they aren't selling it to us because they don't need to. It's usually been stuff with better price to performance or ultra low prices though, rather than ultimate performance stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if they made a top end chip that everyone in China knew about, and we didn't.

Nursie 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Xiamoi is some random chinese company

That might be the funniest thing I read all day. Xiaomi is a massive company that makes all sorts of things, including a lot of pretty high-end mobiles, and has an annual revenue in the order of 75 billion US.

It’s no Apple, but it’s not exactly “some random Chinese company” either.

dismalaf 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> catch up impressivly in a short period of time.

They're using ARM designed cores. So it's more like Apple just isn't as far ahead of ARM as some people claim.

cyanydeez 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I find pro apple comments funnier; but you know, everyones got their own rose colored glasses.

smith7018 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think it's great but it's important to remember that we haven't seen Xiaomi's chips in actual devices under real world tests. We don't know if the speeds are sustainable, under what wattage, etc. Competition is still great and I look forward to learning more, of course.

bayindirh 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I find it funny not because I support Apple. I find it funny because it feels like the leapfrogging happened in early superscalar CPU evolution. The era when the Moore's Law was working.

I enjoy it because of progress, not because of Apple.

yipinwong 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

deaux 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

25 day old account, very first comment about using US models because you can't trust China? Be gone russian bot

@TRACK: yipinwong

Just kidding but seriously man, this level of paranoia isn't healthy. Try talking about it with someone you trust. The comment you're replying to is completely normal.

yipinwong 2 hours ago | parent [-]

ty for the concern.

I'd like to back up my belief and claims based on my metrics and experience.

If data backs it up, then I will apply my baynesian thinking to change my mind.

Anecdotes normally triumphs in real life and biz, but not in online communities.

Zylokloto 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm just a german dude not finding this 'joke' funny.

I'm not an apple fanboy nor a xiamoi fanboy.

Its impressive that a random chinese company was able to catch up to the 2th richest company with global experts so fast and this achievement is not dimnished just because apple announced their M6 today.

Are you some fanboy?

yipinwong 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I've seen so many I am not from China comment in all of the countries I mentioned like in HK, Japanese, Korea, Malaysia, but all turns out they are. Some of those countries communities expose countries, and yes, they are from mostly Guanzhou.

It's just funny how it's consistent they deny their own heritage. Be proud of who you are.

4fterd4rk 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's that legendary German sense of humor.