All of my non-work AI coding is that open-source, so I'm happy to feed my data into the machine.

It's a win for me: my code goes into the training data, and my sessions are fed into future training data, making the model stronger at the type of work I do.

Research, analytics, usage trends, etc. All still incredibly valuable for a company building and tuning an LLM; even if the data itself isn’t directly used in the training set.

Stealth Model, is this a CTF?

LLM needs to become more transparent, not less. Hence, this idea (and trend, possibly) is disgusting.

How can we even possibly verify 'Prompts and completions are retained by the provider and are not used for training...'? What if the training is done, but used internally?

I had the opposite experience. It happily discusses Tiananmen Square but said it would refuse to help with anything "malicious" like writing malware or phishing content.

Rumors from other sources based on how it behaves it's mimo v3

Yeah these stealth models pop up from time to time. Openrouter knows, but doesn't share. Users can use a testing version of something for free and in return the provider generally is allowed to retain the prompts sent in to get real world use. In the past I only really remember using one that was surprisingly good, and then it turned out to be GLM-5.1, speculating on what one this ends up being is part of the fun.

Democratic Peoples Republic of KV cache (DPRK)

the u.s. is friends with then now. haven’t you heard?

I believe its the same as free models in general on Openrouter, 1k requests per day for accounts that have some spend history.

Safety for who?

“ reasonable/no guardrails = Chinese models..”

So conforming to CCP political discourse and propaganda is reasonable now?

https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-4.7/discussions/5