We can know if this is Anthropic/OpenAI by testing the "guardrails" - absurd guardrails = it's them, reasonable/no guardrails = Chinese models..

(as a bonus - thinking forever = GLM)

▲

stogot 2 hours ago | parent [-]

“ reasonable/no guardrails = Chinese models..”

So conforming to CCP political discourse and propaganda is reasonable now?

https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-4.7/discussions/5

▲

janalsncm an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I would imagine the number of people who choose Claude code or Codex because it gives a political opinion they like rather than producing quality code is pretty close to zero.

▲

panarky 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Training to ignore evidence and logic in one domain transfers to reasoning degradation in other domains.

▲

jLaForest 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I choose not to use Grok because I don't want to hear about a made up white genocide in South Africa...

	▲	skeledrew 25 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Would be interesting to see something like that pop up during a coding session.

▲

zb3 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

As someone who used AI to build tools that help me with reverse engineering, I'm not particularly concerned about that political discourse - I could even use a model from the DPRK that constantly praises Kim Jong Un, as long as it would not refuse to help me because of "cybersecurity risk" - this stupid refusal is indeed a problem for me.