after a cursory read, I can confidently say I could not, in fact, have come up with Kimi Delta Attention.

penguin_booze 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

"you could have..." is among the top insulting phrases used by maths-adjacent people. Others in that league are "it should now be obvious...", "it's abundantly clear...", "it can be easily shown that...", "this is nothing but..." etc.

The rest of us reading this are like, holy batman, what the fuck was that?!

▲

egeozcan 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Answer with:

You could have your own hacker news, it's just a textbox, a bunch of tables and headings! Once you add these, it'll be abundantly clear that you also need a database. It should now be obvious that you also need a user system and it can be easily shown that needs a backend. Admin tools, tests, statistics, performance checks and so on can easily be derived from such backend.

▲

ozgung 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Also the proof is so trivial that it’s left to the reader.

▲

BurnerOptical 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

This one hurts the most, esp. in fields you're not familiar.

	▲	hnfong 16 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Well, at least these days an actually trivial (to a domain expert) proof can be delegated to a frontier model...

▲

cubefox 8 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

In the future this might be replaced with "you can verify this fact by asking an LLM of your choice". Similar to how people in chat arguments already post screenshots of an LLM answer as evidence that their opinion is correct.

▲

jameshart 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Math educators like Grant Sanderson (3blue1brown) use it in a very specific way: the goal of a mathematical explanation is to make the learner feel like they could have come up with something. And a really good mathematical communicator can absolutely do that.

A piece like this which uses it in a headline but in no way makes an average reader feel like they could have come up with it is just badly misjudging how good of an explanation it is.

▲

Razengan 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Right next to "Learn More" by software UI designers.

▲

devy 12 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Doubleword AI is conducting a classic textbook marketing trick called newsjacking.

Writing a detailed technical post behind the news of Kimi K3 and KDA algorithm with an audacious title like "You Could Have Invent Breakthrough It too" they are pre-filtering out the ones who couldn't comprehend with quick read (myself included) and attracting the ones who agreed with the blog post. At the end with a strong CTA to promoting their 10x cheapter open weight model AI inference and hiring too.

Good job Doubleword, I see what you are doing there.

▲

nope1000 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't even know most words they used in the paper haha

▲

frankus 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Relevant xkcd: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2501:_Average_Fam...

▲

dd8601fn an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, pretty sure the “you” in “you could have” is a different “you” than “we”.

▲

londons_explore an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The notation looks complex, but underneath it's all just adding and multiplying.

Nothing complex

	▲	teach 40 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Grand Theft Auto VI looks complex, but underneath it's all just ones and zeros and NAND
	▲	ReactiveJelly 44 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		"I invented a new algorithm" "New algorithm, or fmadd?" "... fmadd."
	▲	25 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	baq an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		as is practically all of transformer maths if you squint hard enough...