In fairness, I think that's partly because AAV doesn't have the political and national identity that some other similar dialects have. I (as a lay person with no training in linguistics) feel like AAV and Scots are similar in terms of how far away from English they are, and many people would describe Scots as its own language, distinct from English.

I have an amateur interest in linguistics, that's partially why I asked.

>That guy is speaking a completely unrecognisable language, are there subtitles?

Interestingly enough, I remember reading somewhere that you could be legally entitled to an interpreter in a court setting (take that with a grain of salt, I forget where I read it)

I don't understand the reference. I looked it up here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2617#section-4.3

    4.3 Limited Use Nonce Values

    The Digest scheme uses a server-specified nonce to seed the
    generation of the request-digest value (as specified in section
    3.2.2.1 above).  As shown in the example nonce in section 3.2.1, the
    server is free to construct the nonce such that it may only be used
    from a particular client, for a particular resource, for a limited
    period of time or number of uses, or any other restrictions.  Doing
    so strengthens the protection provided against, for example, replay
    attacks (see 4.5).  However, it should be noted that the method
    chosen for generating and checking the nonce also has performance and
    resource implications.  For example, a server may choose to allow
    each nonce value to be used only once by maintaining a record of
    whether or not each recently issued nonce has been returned and
    sending a next-nonce directive in the Authentication-Info header
    field of every response. This protects against even an immediate
    replay attack, but has a high cost checking nonce values, and perhaps
    more important will cause authentication failures for any pipelined
    requests (presumably returning a stale nonce indication).  Similarly,
    incorporating a request-specific element such as the Etag value for a
    resource limits the use of the nonce to that version of the resource
    and also defeats pipelining. Thus it may be useful to do so for
    methods with side effects but have unacceptable performance for those
    that do not.

Translation for en-US speakers -- Trump is an example of a nonce, as is his buddy - formerly Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Real question: Post 2010, are there any non-English speaking nations that get most of their English language media from the UK? Since everthing went online after 2010, I assume US has the highest influence (linguistically) only because of "mass". Dear UK readers: Please don't interpret my comment that UK language culture is somehow inferior. HN knows and loves UK humor!

I agree, but some people seem to think it is, which i think what the article is a response to: just just in the comment, but in the wider push to use certain language.