Remix.run Logo
Nvidia partners with LG robotics to build humanoid robots in South Korea(blogs.nvidia.com)
38 points by spwa4 3 hours ago | 36 comments
PowerElectronix 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I can't wait to see the day I have to listen to the ad pitch of my robot butler before it goes make me a coffee.

accrual an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I hope early home robotics will be like a game console launch - a community rush to break through any initial barriers to homebrew. Specific early firmwares will be desirable and a whole community will form around creating exploits and running user software. As old robot units fall out of service and are sold in bulk, the community will pick them up and keep them running.

htrp 9 minutes ago | parent [-]

which means that late stage robotics (or game consoles) become very heavily locked walled gardens as every exploit gets patched.

a34729t 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Dont forget the artificial people personalities

spankibalt an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

And you'll better start to practice worshipping those ads unless your ass wants to be the star in B-166ER's last home video.

elil17 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is good to see someone finally working on one of these without the stupid legs

(I think the legs are stupid because they give your robot the chance to fall over and are not relevant for most environments).

45612987 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

LG group uses it naturally for spying from data aggregated in home appliances. The rationale is fluff.

A humanoid robot would demand continuous maintenance, especially after planned obsolescence kicks in. No robot has ever worked under dirt conditions.

raincom 6 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nvidia needs to keep the hype train going, by throwing darts in every possible direction.

ck2 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So every 1000 physical bots are going to need the power and cooling equivalent of those super-popular datacenters they are trying to build everywhere

And I am virtually positive I know what the most popular application for them is going to become, the same way we've somehow decided to legalize gambling and drugs and make them available at a click to everyone everywhere

BTW are people going to be able to hack them to commit crimes? Protest for them?

But eventually everything is used for war to murder undesirables, we're only a decade away from the US or Israel etc. airdropping 1000 armed humanoid robots into a civilian space to hunt for "terrorists"

logicchains 25 minutes ago | parent [-]

>we're only a decade away from the US or Israel etc. airdropping 1000 armed humanoid robots into a civilian space to hunt for "terrorists"

Currently they just bomb the buildings into the ground, killing everyone indiscriminately, so robots can't be any worse than that.

htrp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

why not hyundai (given the existing boston dynamics ownership)?

mkl an hour ago | parent [-]

Why not both? They partner with Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, etc.

trumpdong 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There is no good reason to have a humanoid robot. None. Dishwashers do best in a dishwasher shape.

01100011 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

A couple weeks ago I saw a proud post by a humanoid robot CEO showing off how well his robots could sort objects on an assembly line. It was painful to watch. It's like he's never seen a real industrial sorting system in his life. Vision algos from 30 years ago along with simple mechanics or puffs of air were doing it 100x faster back then. I'm not convinced there is a bubble in AI, but there's definitely one in humanoid robots.

htrp 7 minutes ago | parent [-]

This is the figure tweet?

mattlondon 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A robot that cleans my toilet would be nice. Sure I could have a dedicated toilet cleaning robot, and a dedicated dishwasher loading robot, and a dedicated pickup-up-crap-off-the-floor-the-kids-have-left-around-robot ... or just something general purpose?

I don't care if it is humanoid or not, but given that our house is built for humans to interact with it seems reasonable that it should fit into that space.

logicchains 28 minutes ago | parent [-]

A robot with enough arm strength to properly clean a stubborn toilet wouldn't be safe around kids.

mattlondon 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

I let my current cleaner be around my kids.

Now the question is is it riskier to have basically a stranger with strong arms in my house near my kids, or a robot with strong arms in my house near my kids?

I feel like a robot has the technical capacity to see behind it and stop (I have many times for example been using the vacuum and moving my arm forwards and backwards and whacked a kid in the face with my elbow on the backswing because they've walked up behind me and I've not known, but a robot with literal eyes and radar in the back of its head would spot that situation and freeze). Similar to self-driving cars: they have lots more eyes than a human has, and can be looking everywhere at once etc.

But do we trust the programming? Do we trust the human cleaning my toilet's "programming" (thoughts, emotions, motives etc)?

nerdjon an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A dishwasher is the only reason you can think of a humanoid robot? How about a robot to load and unload the dishwasher.

The fact is we live in a world built for humans. I have a robot vacuum and for it to be effective I had to setup my home in a certain way, and even then it is not fully effective.

People pay for cleaners to come into their home all the time, it shouldn't be hard to think why a humanoid robot would (theoretically, if it worked well) be far better than a purpose built machine in the home. But also in many cases working with those machines.

quietbritishjim an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Where is my non-humanoid robot that does all the household cleaning? Including vacuuming the stairs (a roomba doesn't work there), dusting the surfaces, mopping floors, cleaning windows...

I guess a warehouse can be designed in a way that works well for a non-humanoid robot, but an environment designed for people in the first place (like a home) fundamentally needs to be person-shaped.

usrnm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Dishwashers also cannot work without a human loading and unloading dishes. How do you propose to automate this part?

nearlyepic an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It would actually be pretty easy to do with regular robotics (well, compared to a humanoid robot anyways). The reason nobody does it is that it takes up a ton of space which is at a huge premium in pretty much every kitchen ever.

Also like, loading and unloading the dishwasher is not that hard or time consuming.

mattlondon an hour ago | parent [-]

> Also like, loading and unloading the dishwasher is not that hard or time consuming.

For a me a robot to do the dishwasher would be the number 1 reason for me to buy one.

My dishwasher is basically going at least twice sometimes three times a day (household with small kids). If I "miss" a slot to get everything washed before the next meal time then two things happen:

- the unwashed things begin to build up so there are too many things to fit in the next round and its hard to catch up.

- the things to need to use for meal-Y were still dirty from meal-X so you cant use foo etc.

Its "not much effort" true - perhaps 10-15 mins to unload then reload, but you need to do it 3 or 4 or more times a day AND you need to be there to do it on time so that there is time for it to finish it's load before meal-X etc.

If you are exhausted and its already 11pm and you've got to do your 3rd go at the dishwasher for the day so dirty things from dinner are getting washed and things are put away and ready for breakfast in the morning etc its really annoying. Its the last thing you want to do before going to bed. Or its morning and you're trying to get everyone out the door to school/work and the like, and you need to get the dishes going so that they're clean and ready to unload at lunch time (so that you can get the dirty lunch dishes in at lunch time etc).... you can see how this builds up into quite a pain in the ass hamster wheel.

I would 110% buy a humanoid robot for the cost of a decent second-hand car (so lets say about GBP10-15K) that was able to reliably do three or four 1 hour shifts per day doing basic house-keeper duties autonomously. So aforementioned dishes, cleaning down the dinner table, wiping down the kitchen worktops/countertops, picking up toys and cushions and shoes etc, then it can just go fold itself back into a cupboard in the kitchen to recharge for its next shift. Doesn't have to cook or play the violin or anything, basically just pick up crap off the floor and do the dishes every few hours so I don't have to. Bonus points if it can do it while I am working and/or it can do it silently at night

A man can dream.

nearlyepic 8 minutes ago | parent [-]

You have a house with small kids and you want a 600 pound autonomous robot walking around? These aren’t funny tech products, they’re industrial equipment.

nkozyra an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I think this is a good point, but it ignores the idea that a human form is not the ideal (or even closet to) one to do specific and generalized jobs.

bluGill 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe not human form, but my house is designed for humans. It needs to be able to handle stairs. It needs to handle my doors and halls. It needs to reach upper shelves that are human height (my wife is short and constantly complains about things on a top shelf she cannot reach). I have corners in my house that a large dog can only manage because their spine bends. Human form in many ways is a constraint.

simondotau 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It is ideal insofar as the world has been created with humans in mind. And it’s easier to acquire training data for human shaped entities than for some hypothetical better shape.

Aardwolf an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd love the robot to fill and empty the dishwasher and put the stuff in the correct drawers and cabinets

edit: but if the robot could in addition also do dishes in the sink and not need a dishwasher at all, that'd also save up space in the kitchen for something else

01100011 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

I'd rather have two dishwashers and an automated loading/dispensing system built into each one. The dishwasher is already a fairly optimal dish storage device. Using somewhat standardized dish dimensions would make it fairly easy to implement.

bluGill 10 minutes ago | parent [-]

I wish my kitchen was that big, but even then I think I'd prefer to have my plates stacked. Sure the ones my family uses every meal may as well live in the dishwasher, but I have a few more because once in a while I have guests (or they break) and I don't want those to have the empty space between them the dishwasher needed.

lenerdenator 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Depends on what your definition of "good" is.

If your definition is "it could, at some point, enable me to stop paying humans for their labor and pass along more of the value to major shareholders like myself", then yes, that's a reason to want humanoid robots.

If your definition of "good" is a little more broadly scoped than the above - which it should be if you don't have an MBA and a substance abuse problem - then you're correct.

letmevoteplease an hour ago | parent [-]

In a competitive market, this won't happen: "passing along more of the value to major shareholders like myself." The price of human labor will go down, but competition will force the price of goods to go down alongside it. Profit margins will stabilize, but the cost of living and the cost of goods will plummet. It's like the invention of the power loom: it was terrible for the wages of hand-weavers, but it made clothing radically cheaper and more abundant for the rest of humanity. The only way the shareholders keep all the value is if we allow monopolies to form.

The potential difference here is that it might eliminate all human labor which would likely force us into some new kind of economy. Hopefully something better than one where humans waste their lives on manual labor.

ksec 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I have written this before, It is not AI with digital automation that worries me, generally speaking I think that is a good direction even thought we are still in early stage.

It is Humanoid, that will change everything. While we are still someway off, if we had PC - > Internet > Smartphone > AI, what is after AI will be Humanoid.

We still have another 4-5 years to go on current AI, and then Humanoid will further carry AI forward. This is similar to how Smartphone made the whole internet population 5 - 10 times bigger, further increasing demand on internet infrastructure. If anything, Apple should work on this. Perhaps the only thing that will be bigger than iPhone.

ianm218 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

You say it worries you more than pure digital AI but don't explain. What is it about that humanoids that makes you worry?

forshaper 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I was thinking the other day that Apple is best positioned for drone companions- not even necessarily humanoid, but solving the battery charge problem to have an assistant follow you everywhere.

chaostheory 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

You’d only have to worry if we still had a long horizon of peace and globalism. With more potential breaks in supply chains, everything will cost a lot more in terms of time and money.