| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel 3 hours ago |
| The challenge isn't buying it, the challenge is being able to do phone things with it. Nowadays, you can no longer exist in society without a phone. Most things will work but it takes one critical service that doesn't have a viable workaround, and you're forced to buy (and possibly carry) a "mainstream" phone just for that. Banking, government, authentication, postal service and public transit apps are just some of the common categories that will, in the end, force you to use one of those systems, unless governments mandate viable alternatives. The QR-code based recaptcha that's being introduced will be another brick in the wall. As an individual, it feels like my options are to either submit or try to live a hermit's life, bringing endless suffering and exclusion to myself. |
|
| ▲ | O1111OOO an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Nowadays, you can no longer exist in society without a phone. Is it the phone or just the mobile operating system? I do most of my phone stuff on a tablet that I keep at home - where it's safer. I am currently using an Android phone (without an account) for GPS, phone calls (contacts), internet, games, email (alternatives to google), etc... But for those critical and sensitive apps (banking, etc)... I consider those to be too dangerous to be walking around with. So any phone will serve (I can wait to get home to check email for example). |
| |
| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That doesn't solve for services that by definition need to be accessed on the go, e.g. public transit, parcel pickup, luggage lockers, rental bikes, restaurant menus, paying for parking, etc. (some of these may not mandate phones in your area yet or may allow mobile web alternatives, these are just examples where I've seen strong pushes towards apps or at leas in many places). |
|
|
| ▲ | stdatomic an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There was a time back in covid days where you had to have an app on your phone to go through customs clearance in Canada. |
|
| ▲ | SoftTalker 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can exist, but life will be as inconvenient as it was in the 1990s (though importantly, it didn't seem inconvenient at the time, it was just the way things were). |
| |
| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > as inconvenient as it was in the 1990s That's not true, because in the 1990s there was no presumption that everyone has a major-vendor smartphone. Now, the ways to do things without a smartphone are often disappearing, so things are more inconvenient. For example, ticket machines and printed schedules for public transit are going away in many places. | |
| ▲ | amunozo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I disagree. You cannot even book appointments in a lot of banks today, a thing you could do in the 90s. Like that, a lot of services are unavailable without a smartphone and its non-smartphone equivalent is not available anymore. | | |
| ▲ | svl 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This might be country specific? Specifically dependent on laws in the fields of consumer-protection and keeping things universally accessible. I don't own a smartphone. I have never owned a smartphone. There are inconveniences, and big organizations definitely try to push you toward the way of doing things which has the lowest costs for them - but there are no actual blockers. There is always a path involving actual humans, and regular phone calls (or emails or paper forms). Reactions tend to be wistful variations of "I wish I could" or "but how do you?" - and it's really always about the most trivial inconveniences. | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not my experience. I'm in the USA, and there are still bank branches everywhere, I'd say as many as ever and new ones are being built. In fact within a mile of my house the finishing touches on the latest new one (full remodel of a former restaurant building) are just about done. | |
| ▲ | bdangubic 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why does this permeate the HN all
the time. You can 100% function without a fucking smartphone. My Dad doesn’t have one, he has zero-to-no trouble going to the bank and paying his bills and just about every other imaginable thing. If there was something he could not do and there were repercussions for it he’d be calling an attorney to rectify the situation. It is crazy to keep reading this over and over on HN, so weird | | |
| ▲ | spankibalt an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > "Why does this permeate the HN all the time." It's a bias, an in-bubble illiteracy effect, concerning the perception and analysis of realities (e. g. experiences) outside that bubble, mirroring an in-group's projections about an out-group. It is, in my decades of experience, a very common phenomenon in the IT sector. > "My Dad doesn’t have one, he has zero-to-no trouble going to the bank and paying his bills and just about every other imaginable thing." So far, that holds true for me as well (Germany). > "If there was something he could not do and there were repercussions for it he’d be calling an attorney to rectify the situation." The crux: the increasing friction brought on by rising technological entry barriers. In Germany you have at least the non-exclusion principle of Teilhabe (lit.: participation) which gives certain guarantees. But such achievements of democracy are continually under fire. | |
| ▲ | brookst 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because the real complaint isn’t “it's impossible to live without a smartphone”, it is “I want all of the conveniences of a smartphone without having one, and I want every business to cater to the small minority who don’t want to use a smartphone”. It’s like complaining that it’s difficult to travel to another continent if you don’t want to fly. I want to go from LA to Paris in 12 hours without getting on a plane! | |
| ▲ | 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | rjrjrjrj an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Technically, sure you probably can spend a large amount of time, energy, and money to find alternative non-smartphone ways of navigating through modern life. Practically, you need a smartphone.
Engaging an attorney != practical | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That's the thing. The larger amount of time, energy, and money we spent on doing banking in the 1990s was real. The web, and then mobile apps, made a lot of that more convenient. But it's not impossible to live the old way. You can still write paper checks, go to the bank to make a deposit and get cash, etc. It used to be normal, everyone did it, now it seems extremely inconvenient for most people. | | |
| ▲ | rjrjrjrj 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It is extremely inconvenient. Both because a dwindling minority of people do old things the old way; and because new things (eg Netflix and Uber) are designed for the new way, even if they don't absolutely require it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | II2II an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, and lot of people assume that something doesn't exist because they aren't personally aware of it. Quite often there are people who are willing to serve those who don't make mainstream choices. Other times, it means that you simply have a different lifestyle from the mainstream. There's nothing wrong with that. | |
| ▲ | pjmlp an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In Portugal you have to do that at the bank terminals, otherwise going to the counter implies paying a services tax, depending on the kind of customer one happens to be. | |
| ▲ | willio58 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yep, many older people right now don’t have a smart phone and never will. As long as some younger people stay that course we should be fine. Hopefully we’ll see an increase of dumb phone adoption in a growing cohort younger adults. But the FUD spread in threads like this actually spreads misinformation and makes that less likely to happen |
| |
| ▲ | epolanski an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This. 1. My bank doesn't allow to go in person without an in-app taken appointment. 2. My nephew can't play football in his team, because the team has an app to book/signal your availability. No other way. 3. Half of restaurants in my area do not have non-QR code menus, they just don't. 4. McDonald's will make me pay the scam pricing you get without the app. 5. My doctor gives documentation only and exclusively in digital form, on a special application that doesn't even have a desktop equivalent. 6. My fiance's office badges are smartphone-based. You cannot enter otherwise. 7. All the software she uses at work requires frequent Google/Apple/third party authentication. 8. Increasingly more European airlines exclusively accept in-app check in and documentation. You cannot print it. Ryanair's one of them. I could go on for longer. | | |
| ▲ | jodrellblank 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | 3. you don't need an Apple or Google account to scan a QR code and open a web page. 4. Why is it "scam" pricing? You're getting a discount from giving them your information with an app. 6. I think in the UK / Europe the employer would have to provide your fiancee with a company phone so she could access her workplace, and could not legally require her to have a personal phone with an employer managed/controlled app on it. 7. Does Google/Apple authentication require a Google/Apple app? I see "sign in with Google" on web pages on my Windows desktop. Google Authenticator app is a fairly standard OTP passcode app which can be done in many other programs, password vaults and browser plugins. 8. Ryanair says you can check-in on their website: https://help.ryanair.com/hc/en-us/articles/12888891271953-Ho... | |
| ▲ | ssttoo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I recently skipped a concert at the YouTube theater in LA because my phone is too old for Ticketmaster or Hollywood Park apps. Even though you can go and buy a ticket at the box office they have to send you the ticket to the app. No option to print it or any non-app way. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Oh that true! I've been in multiple clubs/events that you can enter exclusively after having downloaded the app. |
| |
| ▲ | gib444 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > 1. My bank doesn't allow to go in person without an in-app taken appointment. What about other banks? > 3. Half of restaurants in my area do not have non-QR code menus, they just don't. That's crazy. I don't think I even saw 50% during COVID. Must be barely 5% of places that are QR only in the UK. > 4. McDonald's will make me pay the scam pricing you get without the app. Isn't it a scam even with the app pricing? The quality is so so bad these days I feel scammed even paying £1.50 for a burger. > 5. My doctor gives documentation only and exclusively in digital form, on a special application that doesn't even have a desktop equivalent. > 6. My fiance's office badges are smartphone-based. You cannot enter otherwise. Are those compatible with disability laws? > 8. Increasingly more European airlines exclusively accept in-app check in and documentation. You cannot print it. Ryanair's one of them. That is not true for Ryanair. https://help.ryanair.com/hc/en-gb/articles/12889016882065-Ca... : "You can check in on the Ryanair.com website or on the mobile App" "If you checked in but cannot present your boarding pass on the app when you arrive at the airport, you will receive a free of charge boarding pass." (This it is more difficult as their appears to be even fewer staff around than before) Also: "You can check in for your flight at the airport, but you will have to pay an airport check-in fee per passenger to cover the extra cost of the airport check-in service. Please see our Table of Fees." (Admittedly very very expensive) | |
| ▲ | troyvit 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > 3. Half of restaurants in my area do not have non-QR code menus, they just don't. Not knocking this list, the shit is real. But I just had a lovely imaginary conversation with a server asking them what they would recommend and then trying something brand new. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | When I go to a restaurant that has QR-only menus, I won't make a scene about it, but it lowers the mental rating I give the place and I'm less likely to return. | |
| ▲ | chias 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've had this conversation for real. The server's recommendation was that I scan the QR code. That was my last time going to that restaurant. | | |
| ▲ | zephen 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Joke's on the server. The robot that will replace their job soon will be more than happy to regale you with any hallucinated information you would like about the subtleties of the menu. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | gib444 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I walked into my bank the other day and sorted out something, without an appointment. Just joined an informal queue (no digital queueing system! The humans used their eyes and brain to remember who next ) Handed over my physical debit card so they could locate my account. What digital hellscape do you live in? UK here |
| |
| ▲ | everyone 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I dont have a personal smartphone (I do have a pile of them in my office for testing software I make) but I dont use one myself. Its fine, I can do my banking and whatever. I live in Ireland. |
|
|
| ▲ | brookst 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s always been the case. In previous eras people were “forced” to use mastercard / visa, Windows, AT&T, Western Union, East India Company, Templar bnking, etc. I am not remotely defending the situation, past or present, just saying it’s a recurring theme. |
|
| ▲ | logicchains an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd wager the majority of people on this site could afford $100-$200 for a separate phone that's solely used for apps that mandate Google/Apple services. As a bonus, using the "mainstream" phone with only those apps increases security, compared to having your banking apps on the same phone as other random apps. |
|
| ▲ | gib444 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Nowadays, you can no longer exist in society without a phone If my phone breaks, I will die? :) Perhaps it's this spreading of this lie that it's impossible to live without a phone that is contributing to the problem |
| |
| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel 27 minutes ago | parent [-] | | No, but you will likely be inconvenienced to a similar level as losing your house keys, and lose access to important services. You won't immediately die, because most people can survive for quite some time on nothing but questionable river water and a piece of cardboard under a bridge, but there is a difference between survival and existing in society. |
|
|
| ▲ | bdangubic an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Nowadays, you can no longer exist in society without a phone. millions of people would like a word… > Most things will work but it takes one critical service that doesn't have a viable workaround, and you're forced to buy (and possibly carry) a "mainstream" phone just for that. Absolutely not, if there is “critical service” that requires an iPhone or Android you call an attorney. > Banking, government, authentication, postal service and public transit apps are just some of the common categories that will, in the end, force you to use one of those systems, unless governments mandate viable alternatives. There are now and there always will be alternatives > As an individual, it feels like my options are to either submit or try to live a hermit's life, bringing endless suffering and exclusion to myself. As an individual you can and should fight any system that forces you into buying a smartphone. Alternatives must exist even if they might be “incovenient” (e.g. have to do it browser vs. via some “App”) |
| |
| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel 25 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > can and should fight I disagree, because the impact on my quality of life from fighting the fight is just not a level of sacrifice that is sensible. > There are now and there always will be alternatives The problem is that those "alternatives" often come with serious downsides, from higher cost, to massive inconvenience, to having to work around simply not having a service. And while most of the time it's possible to work around it, most people quickly hit the limit where the cost isn't bearable. | | |
| ▲ | bdangubic 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > I disagree, because the impact on my quality of life from fighting the fight is just not a level of sacrifice that is sensible Interesting. I feel then that if this is the case we cannot complain then, no? If the fight is not worth fighting (I think that it is) than complaints about it are pointless (for the lack of a softer word…) |
| |
| ▲ | dheera 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Browser is great until it tells you that you need to use a mobile device. This happens all the time on multiple KYC platforms in the US. My laptop is an equally mobile device, they just don't recognize that. | | |
| ▲ | zephen 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | So far, I have only found this with T-Mobile's app. The good news is that I can go into the nearby T-Mobile store and have them deal with it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | epolanski an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How about a second phone for the things you list? |
|
| ▲ | t1234s 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Bingo.. we will all need to pick which prison we walk ourselves in to: Google or Apple |