| ▲ | Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine(itsfoss.com) |
| 62 points by nreece 3 hours ago | 25 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | Steve6 an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I migrated from Firefox to Brave years ago, and it's been incredible. It's easy to turn off the crypto stuff and turn on more advanced privacy protection. Then it's just a fast browser with awesome adblocking. My favorite recent feature has been Brave Scriptlets, which are just little javascript functions you can run on specific sites. I've replaced most of the add ons I used with small scripts. Pretty nice. I would prefer an engine not built on Chromium... but I've lost faith in Mozilla. I'm glad that Firefox added a built in adblock engine, but it seems too late too late. Brave has been awesome, and being Chromium based gives them time to keep working on stuff that matters. |
| |
| ▲ | esperent an hour ago | parent [-] | | Even better now that they have a paid offering with all that crap stripped out (Brave Origin) which is free on Linux. | | |
| ▲ | pogue 36 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Everyone has made these Brave debloat tools that basically do the same thing as their ridiculous Origin offering. To sell for $60 a web browser that technically has all the features removed is a pretty goofy move. | | |
| ▲ | cr125rider 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Eh that’s a common business model. Pay to get the ads removed is basically the same thing. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | devsda 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I hope this isn't a precursor to removing support for other AdBlock addons(MV2) citing native availability of an AdBlock engine and then gradually shift to acceptable ads etc. |
| |
| ▲ | OsrsNeedsf2P an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | The day Firefox drops MV2 is the day I find a new browser. We're already at <1% usershare, it's not like there's safety in numbers here | | |
| ▲ | pogue 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'd be genuinely curious what you could switch to that still has MV2 because, AFAIK, Firefox is the last holdout. Brave still allows you to install uBlock & some other extensions that should technically not be supported under MV3, but they still ship it with support for those. Just heard about Helium browser, which is just dechromium + uBlock and it's still beta. | | |
| ▲ | cookiengineer 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > I'd be genuinely curious what you could switch to that still has MV2 because, AFAIK, Firefox is the last holdout. My last hope is ladybird right now, I don't use Firefox or Chrome as my main browsers anymore, and use them only within temporary sandboxes. Without history, without cookies, without logins for the most part. | | |
| ▲ | el_io 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Ladybird supports MV2? I had no idea they have extensions. | |
| ▲ | pogue 7 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You use ladybird as your primary web browser? And it works? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | zephyreon an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Could definitely be writing on the wall that MV2 support will be deprecated in the future but imo not necessarily a bad thing if it’s not actively developed anyways. Maintaining both MV2 & MV3 support isn’t easily sustainable long term when you factor in the need to prioritize other features. That said, if this is writing on the wall I’d hope they’ll listen to the community this time and allow the engine to be extended / make it such that a block all ads feature always exists. I’m cautiously optimistic given Mozilla’s track record just over the past year-ish. They have released some great new features that help bring Firefox closer to feature parity with other browsers. I am a Firefox hopeful and recently switched back to using it as my daily driver when Arc went belly up (but mainly for uBlock Origin support). | | |
| ▲ | charleslmunger an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | >Maintaining both MV2 & MV3 support isn’t easily sustainable long term when you factor in the need to prioritize other features. There is no feature Firefox provides that is more differentiating than ublock origin. As long as pages load and security issues are patched it is the reason to choose Firefox as a browser. What would they prioritize over it? | | |
| ▲ | zephyreon an hour ago | parent [-] | | I’d like to see more investment in their new profile manager. It feels pretty barebones at the moment. Arc had the ability to link profiles to “spaces” and you could easily switch between them without opening a new window. It was very nice to so easily swap between personal, work, & side business. | | |
| |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Maintaining both MV2 & MV3 support isn’t easily sustainable long term when you factor in the need to prioritize other features. The feature that better adblockers need is one callback that's similar to one that's still in V3. It's not difficult to keep if it's your own codebase. | |
| ▲ | striking 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Try Zen! Firefox fork with Arc-like UX. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | gbil 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If this means that they release a iOS version with the same Adblock features as brave then I’m sold.
I use essentially all OSs and I want a browser with basic features like adblocking/custom filters on all the platforms and currently Firefox fails this on iOS devices.
Still I believe the Firefox sync is much more robust than eg. Brave one , among various platforms.
But then I will also need Firefox to fix keyboard shortcuts on Android which they had until the Fenix rebase some years ago and still haven’t fixed since |
|
| ▲ | MrAlex94 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think people are reading into this too much - I don’t think Mozilla would ever implement an actual full spectrum ad blocker (although who knows with the new direction Firefox is headed), this will likely be used as an improvement/replacement for the current tracking protection implementation. Weirdly enough, the same time this was added to Geckko is when I started implementing the adblock-rs library for Waterfox - I stumbled across the bindings by accident when using searchfox on the main branch instead of esr140! Quite the coincidence doing it at the same time. |
|
| ▲ | gtrevorjay an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This feels like a betrayal of their ousting of Eich in the first place. I can't imagine a world I would do this and be able to look at myself in the mirror. |
| |
|
| ▲ | nextaccountic 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does this benefit people that use uBlock Origin? Maybe uBlock Origin for Firefox could be updated to make use of this |
| |
| ▲ | toofy an hour ago | parent [-] | | sounds like it just uses ublocks lists. though it doesn’t seem to work as well as ublock, the ad slots are still there with just the ad missing so there’s a giant ugly blank spot. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | fishgoesblub an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's surprising, and disappointing that this hasn't happened sooner. A real shame that it took a browser company other than Mozilla to make (In Rust no less!) adblock-rust. I wonder if this could've been a native Firefox feature and selling point years ago if Eich wasn't kicked out. |
