Remix.run Logo
Steve6 2 hours ago

I migrated from Firefox to Brave years ago, and it's been incredible. It's easy to turn off the crypto stuff and turn on more advanced privacy protection. Then it's just a fast browser with awesome adblocking.

My favorite recent feature has been Brave Scriptlets, which are just little javascript functions you can run on specific sites. I've replaced most of the add ons I used with small scripts. Pretty nice.

I would prefer an engine not built on Chromium... but I've lost faith in Mozilla. I'm glad that Firefox added a built in adblock engine, but it seems too late too late. Brave has been awesome, and being Chromium based gives them time to keep working on stuff that matters.

abdullahkhalids an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The Greasemonkey Firefox addon that allows you to run site specific JS has been around for two decades [1].

[1] https://www.greasespot.net/2005/03/

Brybry 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

And they even have a name: userscripts! [1]

Chrome also used to natively support userscripts back in 2010 [2] but they mostly killed it off

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Userscript

[2] https://lifehacker.com/chrome-4-supports-greasemonkey-usersc...

halapro 17 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It certainly is great to have first-party support for such a simple feature. It doesn't have to support the whole GM_ API

vachina 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don’t see how supporting Chromium is better than not supporting an alternate rendering engine. Firefox for the end-user is fantastic.

dlcarrier an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's too bad that Mozilla does everything they can to alienate its users, with failed attempts to attract a different but non-existent new user-base. Without them, and with Safari being run by a company that likes to tie its software to its hardware, there's pretty much no reasonable non-Chrome-based web browsers, so it's the new Internet Explorer, and many web pages only work on it, because no one tests their web pages on anything else.

esperent 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even better now that they have a paid offering with all that crap stripped out (Brave Origin) which is free on Linux.

pogue 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Everyone has made these Brave debloat tools that basically do the same thing as their ridiculous Origin offering.

To sell for $60 a web browser that technically has all the features removed is a pretty goofy move.

topspin 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> a pretty goofy move

I'm doing a goofy thing and buying it, despite knowing I can debloat Brave, because I already do that. I didn't know this existed till I read this thread. I've been benefitting from Brave for many years now; it's great that they've provided a way to pay for this without dealing with the crypto stuff, and I'm extremely happy to do so, because they deserve some of my money.

cr125rider 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Eh that’s a common business model. Pay to get the ads removed is basically the same thing.

pogue 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, I'll link to this video review by Techlore.

Brave Just Released a Paid Browser: Here's What You Need to Know https://youtube.com/watch?v=3i5KH0l895o

armada651 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> It's easy to turn off the crypto stuff

I'm living under a rock, but my first thought was that you turned off TLS.

dlcarrier an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Instead of turning it off, you can just make it useless: https://youtu.be/M1si1y5lvkk

the-grump an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If your mind goes to TLS when you read crypto, you surely do live under a rock ... in bliss.

devsda an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

As a developer, personally I would be worried if that wasn't my first thought when someone uses browser and crypto together :D