|
| ▲ | lbreakjai 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The cost to hire a human is highly predictable. The cost of AI isn't. I, as a human, need food and shelter, which puts a ceiling to my bargaining power. I can't withdraw my labour indefinitely. The power dynamics are also vastly against me. I represent a fraction of my employer's labour, but my employer represents 100% of my income. That dynamic is totally inverted with AI. You are a rounding error on their revenue sheet, they have a monopoly on your work throughput. How do you budget an workforce that could turn 20% more expensive overnight? |
| |
| ▲ | bornfreddy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | By continuously testing competitors and local LLMs? The reason for rising prices is that they (Anthropic) probably realized that they have reached a ceiling of what LLMs are capable of, and while it's a lot, it is still not a big moat and it's definitely not intelligence. | |
| ▲ | alex_sf an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The same way companies already deal with any cost. | |
| ▲ | zer00eyz 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The cost of AI isn't. This is why there are a ton of corps running the open source models in house... Known costs, known performance, upgrade as you see fit. The consumer backlash against 4o was noted by a few orgs, and they saw the writing on the wall... they didnt want to develop against a platform built on quicksand (see openweb, apps on Facebook and a host of other examples). There are people out there making smart AI business decisions, to have control over performance and costs. |
|
|
| ▲ | piker 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That was a great promise before the models starting becoming "moody" due to their proprietors arbitrarily modifying their performance capabilities and defaults without transparency or recourse. |
| |
| ▲ | mh- 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I still haven't seen any statistically sound data supporting that this is happening on the API (per-token pricing.) If you've got something to share I'd love to see it. |
|
|
| ▲ | louiereederson 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think it's difficult to say agentic and human developer labor are fungible in the real world at this point. Agents may succeed in discrete tasks, like those in a benchmark assessment, but those requiring a larger context window (i.e. working in brownfield systems, which is arguably the bulk of development work) favor developers for now. Not to mention that at this point a lot of necessary context is not encoded in an enterprise system, but lives in people's heads. I'd also flip your framing on its head. One of the advantages of human labor over agents is accountability. Someone needs to own the work at the end of the day, and the incentive alignment is stronger for humans given that there is a real cost to being fired. |
| |
| ▲ | kennywinker 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | For some the appeal of agent over human is the lack of accountability. “Agent, find me ten targets in iran to blow up” - “Okay, great idea! This military strike isn’t just innovative - it’s game changing! A reddit comment from ten years ago says that military often uses schools to hide weapons, so here is a list of the ten most crowded schools in Iran” | | |
| ▲ | Our_Benefactors 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It must be wild to actually go through life believing the things written in this post and also thinking you have a rational worldview. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | michaelbuckbee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| More importantly it collapses mythical-man-month communication overhead. |
|
| ▲ | pona-a 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think the word you're looking for is contractors. But yes, you still have to treat those with _some_ human decency. |
|
| ▲ | krainboltgreene 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ah-ha, the perfect slave. |
|
| ▲ | cyanydeez 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| it just will delete production database when flustered. no biggie. we learning how to socialize again. cant let all that history go to waste. |
| |
