| ▲ | stetrain 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
So the risk factor for Apollo could have actually been 1/1000 but they were just really unlucky? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | shash 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yes, actually. This is similar to having a 100 year flood five years in a row. It doesn’t mean that the flood occurs only once in 100 years. _On average_ it’s 1/100 probability of occurring in any given year. But then, Apollo 1 was after all the first mission on the Saturn V. I think we should assess even its pre-launch risk much higher than the rest of them. Similarly Artemis II has a much higher risk than the subsequent ones will have. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | d1sxeyes 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If I toss a coin four times and it comes up heads three and tails once, it doesn’t mean that there’s a 75% chance that this coin lands heads up. Be careful about conflating risk factor and mortality rate. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||