Remix.run Logo
Aurornis 7 hours ago

> There's an oft told story about Jeff Bezos pausing a meeting to call his own customer service number - and waiting over 10 minutes for an answer.

One of my jobs was at a company that had developed at unhealthy amount of bureaucracy and politics. The product barely mattered to some because they were playing internal games of grandstanding, taking credit, and building their empires.

In meetings where were supposed to be talking about product direction and priorities I would some times pull out my phone and open the app to try to demonstrate some real problem with the service. The tone of the meeting would change to panic as certain product leads would try to do anything to stop me from showing what the real product did instead of their neatly prepared slide decks that showed a much nice story for the executives. I became the enemy for showing the actual product instead of their alternate world of KPIs and charts.

apexalpha 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I work at a (government and extreme bureaucratic) organisation that builds apps used by field engineers.

I found out SSO was broken. They had to login to every app using the same account. Twice per day because the token live was 4 hours "for security".

I found out it was because they published these apps as PWAs, making them more isolated than normal apps.

I asked the product manager and he says the issue is "with Apple and Google", not his department. When asked why he chose PWAs for the apps he said this was easier to deploy, saves them developer accounts and such.

Since I can't force him to change I found a workaround: SSO works in PWAs if you use Edge on a recent Android version on a Samsung tablet. Lucky me we had bought Samsung tablets (this was not a requirement when purchasing I looked it up, just luck).

I asked the Intune manager about this and they said the field engineers should just set Edge as default in stead of Chrome.

When trying this on a company tablet it said: "Edge disabled by X group policy". That guys' department set the policy...

After they removed this I asked why it wasn't the default browser and he said this wasn't possible. I challenged him on this by Googling the Intune manual to set the default browser.

Later they said they had raised a support ticket with Microsoft for this.

On the internal Wiki I found a document describing the problem. It was dated 11 months before I joined.

arbirk 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I once worked in a government agency where 4 employees used a app that on ran on IE6. So the rest of the 2000 strong organization had to use chrome by remote desktop into a server.

Decision tree: Does any department still use IE6? Yes -> lets setup a Remote Desktop cluster so the rest can use Chrome

antisthenes 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The short of it is: no one gives a shit about anything but their own paycheck and getting off of work at 5pm.

It's the human condition (and also in part the companies' own fault since they stopped investing in employees)

The people who give a shit and are passionate eventually join the other 99.9%, because it's absolutely exhausting pulling the cart with 10 freeloaders on it who don't care.

I envy the people who can give a shit for longer than 2-3 years at any given job. I suppose being your own boss is one of the few ways to stay passionate and care about something for a long enough period of time.

apexalpha 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I do!

I border collied these people into a room and the issue is now fixed.

The system still sucks but 2000 field engineers got 10 min of their days back.

A few weeks later the Scrum Master of the PWA team gave an inspiring talk about it at a conference.

Personally you couldn't torture out of me that my app was so bad for so long, but yeah.

antisthenes 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Interesting...I happen to have a border collie and their ability to get things done their way simply by looking at humans is...uncanny.

I will have to think of things like this where can save 5-10 min on something program-wide.

hluska 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You border collied them? I’ve noticed a real turn towards aggressive disrespect in this community. It’s really gross and it doesn’t make you look smart. They’re humans have some respect and don’t be so toxic. You don’t have to dehumanize your coworkers. This is basic.

dxdm 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I see a fun metaphor for doing the tedious work of arranging a meeting, getting people to join, and getting a solution. Reading it put this way made my day a little brighter. I needed that, too.

Btw, border collies are awesome dogs, and sheep are also awesome. I find no automatic disrespect in using them as stand-ins for our human foibles; intent matters.

GP, please don't be discouraged.

tonyarkles 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

One of my first real experiences with Border Collies was at a family reunion. There were a bunch of kids running around playing in the park. At one point someone showed up with a border collie and I watched with delight and amazement as the dog did the herding thing and slowly and carefully pushed the group of children closer together. The kids didn't even realize it until they were way too close to each other to comfortably play tag. The owner called the dog back and the games continued.

Later on I ended up with a sheltie with a very strong herding instinct. She mostly just acted like the Fun Police though with the other dog and cats. Lovely creatures!

Herding sheep is such an interesting experience too. The best way I can describe it is that each sheep has a really large soap bubble around them. You need to push gently on the bubble to get them to go where you want them too. If you push too hard and the bubble pops, they'll scatter and you have to step back and let the bubble reform.

dpark 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Imagine the pearl clutching if he’d used the “herding cats” metaphor.

losvedir 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not much a fan of metaphor? I personally appreciated the way they described about getting (corralling? shepherding? herding? Lots of common animal husbandry expressions in English) all the relevant humans together.

primitivesuave 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

English is full of animal-based metaphors, and that's a pretty innocuous statement. "I herded everyone into a room" does not automatically imply that one perceives those people as animals.

testaccount28 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

in this analogy, it is OP who is the dog.

jrockway 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I think the choice of breed has meaning. The border collie is the smartest breed of dog, and its origin is in herding sheep. Calling your coworkers sheep isn't particularly nice. Calling yourself the smartest breed of dog isn't particularly humble. That's why the person you're replying to objects.

phil21 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Ridiculous. We should be calling people out for being performatively offended. It reduces the impact and gravitas of situations where real offense is given that should be considered.

I have herded cats, sorted sheep, and wrangled cattle all throughout my career. I can come up with more that are quite accurate to the situation.

And I've been the cat, sheep, and cattle likely more than I have been on the other side.

It's simply part of working with groups of humans. We become dumb in groups and lend ourselves towards herd behavior. It often requires someone tending to us to break us of the habit.

dpark 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is some really tortured logic to find something to get offended about.

> Calling yourself the smartest breed of dog isn't particularly humble

Surely “smart as a border collie” is not a high bar for a human.

adiabatichottub 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's probably reading too much into the metaphor. I think it's apropos because regardless of whether the others are smart or not, we all have blind sides, and in order to get things done that need to be done you have to apply pressure in the right way to overcome a certain amount of group inertia. Those things still fit with the metaphor without necessarily being disrespectful.

unnamed76ri 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have a relative that has a border collie and the thing has got to have the dog version of Down syndrome.

This dog does the worst job of being a dog that I’ve ever seen.

wpm 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They should stop acting so much like sheep then.

testaccount28 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

they did not call their coworkers sheep, though.

a border collie can nip the heels of humans just as well.

nocman 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's absolutely nothing wrong with the word picture that was used. I'd advise against assuming the worst possible interpretation of someone else's words (especially online). Most of us probably do that at least sometimes (present company included), but it would be much better to give people the benefit of the doubt. In this case, I think it is fair to assume that the original poster was just saying that he wouldn't let them try to get away and not actually deal with the problem -- much as a border collie prevents other animals from straying from the group, keeping them where they need to be.

There is no need to assume that they meant that the others in the meeting were less important or less intelligent, or whatever. They were, perhaps, just less interested in dealing with the problem.

apexalpha 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

'corralled' better for you?

And yeah I did that. It wasn't even my app. Or my team. Or my field engineers.

I was just fucking ashamed of our entire IT department and thus took it upon me to fix this.

It was the first time the PM had ever spoken to a field engineer, I think.

ornornor 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I guess we’ve worked at different places.

array_key_first 3 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Giving a shit is actively disincentivized in most companies because:

1. It stirs up trouble for other people, who will now hate you.

2. It demonstrates you're willing to go the extra mile. Like all productivity gains, this only works to your disadvantage - you will be given more work, and it will be more complex.

3. The systems in place are designed to be rigid, so when you give a shit you will probably fail, which reflects poorly on you. Setting low expectations and meeting them is usually better than setting high expectations and falling short.

bix6 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I suppose being your own boss is one of the few ways to stay passionate and care about something for a long enough period of time.

I run a business and the passion is still hard to maintain. On Friday one of my customers cussed me out for 20 mins because I took a few hours to respond. That was a tough way to start the weekend.

CalChris 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s a problem of motivation. Now, if I work my ass off and Initech ships a few extra units, I don't see another dime. So where's the motivation? And here's another thing, Bob. I have eight different bosses right now!

deaux 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Believe it or not, there exist places where 50% or more give a shit.

I'm sure at Apple under Jobs, the % would've been very high. It will have dropped significantly by now.

You're absolutely right on a country-scale though.

anal_reactor 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It gets worse. In my company the least competent people care the most.

interludead 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is like a perfect case study in how problems don't get solved, they just get… routed

caminante 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Liars gonna lie.

> I challenged him on this by Googling the Intune manual to set the default browser.

I've found that LLMs really democratize debate when issues like this arise!

Can't guarantee you'll win, but when someone bets you're not willing to RTFM to call their bluff-- Oh boy!

phyzome 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's funny that you're replying with a recommendation to use LLMs when the parent comment is about how a search engine worked just fine.

darepublic 5 hours ago | parent [-]

If I google a question like that these days I'm likely to get an LLM response as the first result. The line is definitely blurred

caminante 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The irony isn't lost on me, either.

Googling does result with a Gemini/AI response at the top.

eichin 3 hours ago | parent [-]

that's why you set &udm=14 in the search URL config...

jnovek 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’m so tired of the “nothing ever happens” crowd. Y’all are absolutely exhausting and add nothing positive to the conversation. Assuming everyone on the internet is lying makes as little sense as assuming nobody on the internet is lying.

Edit: I guess I misunderstood the parent (look in the replies). I hate the phenomenon I’m describing so I’ll leave the comment but I don’t want to besmirch caminante’s good name!

caminante 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Are you replying to the intended comment?

The parent said they were getting stonewalled by a colleague over a T/F. Maybe you're assuming I called the parent a liar...?

dpark 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah. I think your comment is being misunderstood.

caminante 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I blame me ;-). Though, one haywire reply can taint everyone's interpretation!

jnovek 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Thanks for the heads up! I’ve edited my comment to absolve you of any crime. :-P

caminante 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Not offended. Try to have a 'better' day.

hluska 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is an odd level of aggression. Life is too short.

caminante 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What do you propose instead?

edit: Nevermind. You shared your thoughts in a later comment above, dismissing the HN forum as vindictive.

Quarrelsome 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

life is too short to spend it drowning in misinformation. Calling someone out on a technical failure is 100% legit. How is it "aggressive" if they're clearly wrong?

riversflow 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Life is too short for liars.

sgarland 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I legitimately don’t understand how companies get to this point, especially when the C-suite is full of founders (or maybe that’s worse?). I can understand how people want to make their bosses happy, and that can cascade into constant bullshitting, but at some point why doesn’t the CTO / CEO / etc. say “I’m going to go have conversations with the workers to get their perspective?”

The U.S. Nuclear Navy, for all of its many flaws, gets this right. Generally at least once a year, the head of Naval Reactors - a four-star Admiral - tours every vessel, which may include a brief underway period. During this tour, the Admiral will talk to the engine room watchstanders, with all senior leadership removed. They’ll ask how daily life is, what they find challenging or annoying, what they like, etc. There’s obviously a lot of self-filtering (though sometimes not - Navy Nukes are not known for their social graces) that occurs, and also what a junior watchstander finds annoying may just be a required part of the job, but some useful signal is gathered.

Even outside of the nuclear program, one standout example was Admiral Zumwalt, who as Chief of Naval Operations implemented 70 different changes over his tenure as a direct result of talking to sailors, all of which were designed to improve quality of life, efficiency, or communication.

arjie 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The truth is you can't get anyone to do what you want. You can try to make them do what you want but they're someone else in the end. Sir Walter Raleigh's beloved friend and lieutenant was Lawrence Kemys. When Raleigh was pardoned and sent back to find El Dorado, the conditions set were that he should not attack the Spaniards. He goes out to South America, and puts a detachment ashore led by his close friend and confidant - as aligned a person as you can imagine. Kemys attacks a Spanish outpost against express orders, gets Raleigh's son killed, returns to Raleigh to inform him of this, and promptly commits suicide. None of this is going to help Raleigh, though, because the conditions of his pardon now having been violated he is executed as promised.

cbg0 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> at some point why doesn’t the CTO / CEO / etc. say “I’m going to go have conversations with the workers to get their perspective?”

Why would you when all of the reports you're getting from your managers are 5/5 stars and "everything's great". Once an organization gets large enough, the information that reaches C-suite has been filtered through so many layers that it barely resembles reality anymore, even when you remove malice from the equation.

sgarland 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Because if you’re in charge of an org, you should occasionally validate what you’re being told? Is this an uncommon belief or something?

anal_reactor 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Surprisingly, it is. If you find a problem then the value of your shares drops.

sdeframond 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Still, better than letting the problem find you.

Quarrelsome 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

its extremely hard if you're being lied to when your org is so vast that trusting delegated responsible individuals is the realistic way of managing it. Also its probably not going to factor into your bonus.

apexalpha 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At my org the CIO knows fuck all about computers. Great guy on a personal level but wouldn't be able to quit Vim even if the lives of his 3 kids depended on it.

He was put there because he was with the company for years before and he led other departments fine.

Since he can't evaluate anything IT related himself he relies on 'advice' from the people beneath him who try to get the most budget for their departments by overstating how important they are.

This layer beneath him is mostly product managers, RTEs etc... (We are SAFE Agile! Developer Velocity, Woohoo!).

They also don't know much about computer and if they do it's very domain specific, such as SAP or so.

These people try to fight for budget by overstating their importance. They demonstrate this by having more apps and more people relying on them.

"Look we handled 2000 support tickets, the company would grind to a halt without us!".

Never mind that having 2000 support tickets is a bad thing. And also mostly caused by their shitty apps.

This keeps going on and on. I have 10 years experience as engineer and wanted to see "the other side" but it's so exhausting.

A few months back a 'privacy officer' asked why the first and last names of our employees were in the Active Directory and ordered them to reduce the privacy risks.

They failed to specify what risks. Couldn't articulate them even when asked. They also didn't say when the risk would've been reduced 'enough'.

The team was panicking as they were now 'non-compliant' with company policy.

I had to intervene personally to make sure this single directive didn't derail our entire company.

sgarland 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Never mind that having 2000 support tickets is a bad thing. And also mostly caused by their shitty apps.

I’m constantly having to fight people to not add new, inactionable alerts as knee-jerk reactions to incidents. I swear the thought process is “an incident happened, we added a new alert - look, we’re proactive!” instead of, you know, fixing the root causes.

apexalpha 6 hours ago | parent [-]

When WeTransfer suddenty changed it's policy for AI training last summer the entire CISO department panicked and had the entire website blocked.

In traffic we could see that 12% of the company used the site daily, transferring gigabytes of data between our engineers and contractors.

I asked why we didn't just start paying WeTransfer since it's so widely used and this would solve the problem, too.

They said they should just use the internal SharePoint file sharing tool.

I asked how this would work since most of WeTransfer use was us receiving docs, not sharing them.

They said the contractors should just update their policy, and that was the end of the debate.

Last time I spoke to a field engineer he said they mostly use private mailboxes now mostly since they "can't even copy something in Outlook anymore" on company laptops.

I decided not to report this to CISO and these docs are workorders and pictures demonstrating workorders have been completed. They're irrelevant one day later.

Quarrelsome 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

tbf quitting vim is extremely unintuitive to someone that opened it by accident for the first time.

budman1 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

quitting vi is a basic competency test.

would you listen to a doctor that could not suture a cut? how about a mechanic that could not remove a socket from a ratchet?

simple file editing. vi has been around for every. if you haven't seen it, and needed it at least once, what have you been doing?

(personal anecdote: once had an engineering VP bring up that a stray ":wq" in a document was a sign of a real engineer...working outside of where he should be..)

ericd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’d been developing with emacs for years before I learned how to quit vi. Just means he’s never had to change the config on a remote server with a barebones setup :-)

vovavili 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's more of a cheap gotcha than a valid test. If we take somebody like me, I learned to code in IDEA/PyCharm, these days mostly code with either Zed or OpenCode, and occasionally drop into nano and Positron. I wouldn't be able to do anything in Neovim without looking it up simply because I had no reason to learn it. A doctor who learned practices appropriate in the 20th century might now necessarily be hired for knowledge of these practices today.

hnthrow0287345 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm certainly not listening to someone who thinks vi is used by every developer

budman1 an hour ago | parent [-]

used. maybe not. but cognizant of it. sure. and having used it once or twice.

come on! you are a software expert and you never had to edit a file on a machine where claude was not available?

budman1 an hour ago | parent [-]

what would you say about a EE that could not use a scope?

Quarrelsome 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> quitting vi is a basic competency test.

no, its pop quiz bullshit. Oh you know about ":wq"? Well done! But if you don't know, you do it a few times and now you know. It does nothing, outside of teaching you a bit about poor UX.

> if you haven't seen it, and needed it at least once, what have you been doing?

using one of the other available ides?

> once had an engineering VP bring up that a stray ":wq" in a document was a sign of a real engineer...working outside of where he should be..

That's not a sign of good judgement, that's a sign of being technically fashionable. It's hipster shit, akin to rejecting a candidate because they're a fan of Taylor Swift and don't know who the band Tool are.

johnisgood 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What distinguishes knowing about vim from knowing about virtually anything else? If you apply to a job in tech, you should know that by long-pressing the power button, your PC turns off. Is this pop quiz shit, too? The bar is ridiculously low these days, apparently.

Quarrelsome 3 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

marssaxman 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I used `killall vi` from another terminal for years before I finally memorized the proper way to do it.

thaumasiotes 2 hours ago | parent [-]

How did you save the edits you made in vi?

SilasX 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Funny/informative story about this: There was a project, OpenHatch.org c. 2011 that tried to get people to be comfortable enough with programming to contribute to open source projects. In one of the tutorials (I think introducing command-line git?), if you followed the instructions, it would dump you into vim. It hadn't introduced to you vim by that point or explained that's what was happening, so you wouldn't even know enough to google the error. And this was a project that was supposed to be primarily focused on being newbie-friendly!

edent 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I legitimately don’t understand how companies get to this point

The people who start a company care deeply about the problem they're trying to solve.

The first N employees also care - they're willing to risk working for start-up because they can see the potential and want to help.

But then you hire, say, an accountant. The accountant doesn't care about your mission. You are just another client to them. You need someone to staff the phone or sweep the floors or design the logo or whatever. Why should they care? You're not paying them to care, they're not invested in the company nor its success, and they believe nothing they do for the company will change their personal fortunes.

Then, before you know it, you have a couple of floors filled with people who have no incentive to care.

It is incredibly difficult to run an organisation where everyone is mission driven.

interludead 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think a big part of it is that, at some scale, leaders stop lacking access to reality and start lacking incentive to engage with it

Twirrim 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

About 10 years ago now, when what would eventually become Oracle Cloud Infrastructure had just done an internal launch of the first availability domain, as we got ourselves read for public launch late in the year, several senior staff and engineers had to go do a presentation and demonstration of the product to Larry Ellison.

They did trial run after trial run, made sure trying to make sure there were no bugs in the demonstration path. They nailed it, presentation went smoothly, live demonstration just worked. Provisioned a bare metal instance, had it running hosting something within minutes of launch. Larry was suitably impressed, but the thing that most impressed him was that he'd been presented with an end-to-end live demonstration. It had never occurred to any of the folks involved to do it any other way, but apparently all too often, all he ever saw was slide shows from product teams, particularly when things were several months away from public launch.

I reflect on that situation from time to time, wondering at which stage you sort of go from expecting to see live demonstrations, to slide shows. I assume it just slowly slips away from you, one at a time until you're stuck in the land of "make believe we have a good product".

Quarrelsome 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> I reflect on that situation from time to time, wondering at which stage you sort of go from expecting to see live demonstrations, to slide shows. I assume it just slowly slips away from you, one at a time until you're stuck in the land of "make believe we have a good product".

I used to work a very small org with an 80+ year old CEO. I feel like half the time the slide decks were unchanged and very little was getting done but I'm not sure the CEO noticed. Given the CEO often sidelined those meetings themselves, by having some bizarre senior moments. So what should be a 30m meeting always became a 2hr+ long one. The guy used to be technical but as you describe it had slipped away from him a long time ago and he had failed to delegate effectively.

Those meetings felt like my real job was just theatre for the boss in some sort of quasi-nursing home stage, where we helped them maintain the illusion they were running an entirely functioning business. I half wonder if in my short time there, I was a mug for actually doing any work.

AndrewKemendo 5 hours ago | parent [-]

After 30 working years let me confirm: Every job is performance theater for the people who control the company

xingped 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Amusing you picked that quote to quote because your job description is a dead ringer for Amazon work culture.

pengaru 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I suspect it's a dead ringer for Corporate America at any large American company.

crossroadsguy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The later part of that quoted passage ends with a possibly rhetorical question.

> ... When was the last time the CEO of the above company called their own customer support line?

So Bezos definitely hasn't done that in a long time. Definitely not in India. So I would say the answer ought to be: a CEO does that or has to do that only until the company becomes too big or has captured a sufficiently entrenched large slice of the market.

binsquare 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At one meeting to build out a new service as a next generation to a flagship AWS service that I worked on, I got to meet all the product leaders and managers.

At that meeting, I realized most of them had never used the product and see their claim to leadership role due to their the ability to manage up and down.

I use the product on my personal projects and I hated it with a passion.

interludead 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The fact that showing the actual product in a product meeting triggers panic tells you everything you need to know about how far things have drifted

assimpleaspossi 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The story is told in the recent book about Bezos and Amazon. The one by Brad Stone.