| ▲ | Retr0id 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||
There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bob1029 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I feel like there is an unofficial version of AGTI already in place for certain AI providers. Whenever I generate a large amount of code, there is a ~20% chance that my editor will pop a warning "Some unicode characters in this file could not be saved in the current codepage". I suggest taking a look at the raw outputs of a major AI provider in a hex editor. That (zero-width) whitespace could be hiding a lot of information. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | marginalia_nu 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
(Flashbacks from the horrors in the Byte Order Mark wars) | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lxgr 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Maybe considered serious by its proponents. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wizzwizz4 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> For example, every other letter in this sentence is U+2060. No it isn't! The PDF renderer has stripped them out. | ||||||||||||||