| ▲ | hightrix 3 hours ago |
| Are there any less obviously aggressive tactics we can use? Wear something that is blinding to the cameras, or something else to obfuscate? |
|
| ▲ | pluc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Slapping a pair of glasses that are recording you, processing your face, sending biometrics and images back to one of the worst privacy offenders on the planet off of the face of someone who is willingly doing all that without asking your permission is a perfectly appropriate reaction. Put your shoulder into it. I'd rather we normalize that than adversarial fashion.. but that's probably what you were looking for. |
| |
| ▲ | juleiie an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah sure you are going to start slapping people on the street mr badass guy. That’s all cool and fun until someone pulls a knife on you. Look, the previous commenter has legitimate question how can we do it for real. Not just speed run to the gates of afterlife after touching the wrong person. | | |
| ▲ | quantified an hour ago | parent [-] | | First wearers are more likely to have a concealed carry. They have the money, and are from the right demographics. | | |
| ▲ | juleiie 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah in any case it will end badly for you if not the first time then eventually. Who lives by the sword dies by the sword. It just takes one unlucky time where the other person doesn’t subscribe to the idea of proportional response or has military training with muscle memory that takes over. | | |
| ▲ | jmye 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It’s weird how y’all are so desperate to catastrophize responses, and then want to call other people “internet badasses”. Look in the mirror next time you tell someone they’re going to get shot, bud. You’re the problem. | | |
| ▲ | juleiie 16 minutes ago | parent [-] | | When stranger assaults you, every person with some practical military training is going to want to neutralise target as fast as possible because this is the survival strategy that is hammered into your muscle memory. There is no thinking or musing whether they just want to slap you or I don’t know what. You don’t know your attacker and their intentions. This is the real world. I don’t know why you would think this is some kind of stupid game to go around and slap people. It will cause problems. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | hightrix 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | While I'd like to agree with you, and do in some cases, there are many cases where this just isn't a feasible approach. For example, a peer coworker has a pair of these. I just don't interact with her while she is wearing them. If my boss were to get a pair there is no way I can justify slapping them off his face. | | |
| ▲ | DrewADesign 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s also at least simple assault, and quite possibly aggravated assault on someone that has a sophisticated camera pointed at your face that’s sending biometrics, images, and probably video back to one of the worst privacy offenders on the planet. Feels great to say it. Would feel great to do it. Morally defensible to anyone that knows anything about privacy if the person isn’t low-vision or something. In reality, a terrifically stupid idea. | | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | diath an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Completely spineless beta stance. For every person with Meta glasses, there's 100s of people without, if we normalize bitch slapping these people, then what is the police gonna do, arrest >99% of the adult population? The point is to keep doing it until it instills fear in the mind of these people that they should not wear these in public spaces or there may be consequences. | | |
| ▲ | juleiie an hour ago | parent [-] | | This is trolling at best. If you touch a wrong person, you will not live to tell the tale. People aren’t some NPC in a video game my friend. This isn’t a movie. Even I, average looking girl, walk with a knife everywhere and I am trained how to use it to kill, it’s muscle memory. In US, a lot of people stroll around with guns. | | |
| ▲ | diath 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > Even I, average looking girl, walk with a knife everywhere and I am trained how to use it to kill I can guarantee you that if you ever end up getting sucker punched by an adult male, you will at best get dazed and not know what's going on, and at worst knocked out cold. The knife is giving you a false illusion of safety. It would only ever be really effective if you were the attacker that pulled out the knife on a victim with the intention to inflict harm. The first to strike usually comes out on top. | |
| ▲ | 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | dylan604 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't think you could justify slapping them off of anybody's face unless you really just like to assault people. | | |
| ▲ | deaux an hour ago | parent [-] | | Streaming someone live to Meta, potentially the most evil company in the world (not "per employee" but by "damage done per day") without their permission, especially in a place where this is not at a expected - like an office rather than a football stadium - is great justification. It ticks all the boxes. |
| |
| ▲ | miki123211 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They're incredibly popular in the blind community, and for good reason. I think even the political activists will be extremely divided on this one. You have privacy on one hand, accessibility and a genuinely life-changing technology on the other. | | |
| ▲ | tartoran 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Do blind people not care about data privacy? Most likely they do and should ask for good TOS now while still possible. | |
| ▲ | quantified an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, this could be the "lost dog" approach that Ring was trying. I feel for the blind. But in weighing their concern against everyone else's... they should get a different supplier. | |
| ▲ | deaux an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They shouldn't be divided, they should (wo)man up and say the thing they well know out loud: the harms to society are not worth it, the societal consequences of Meta being in control of this are severe and will, as always, hurt the weak and poor the most. Unfortunately the blind community will have to wait a few more years to get a local version, which is guaranteed to appear with how things are going. | |
| ▲ | numpad0 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | High end phones these days run smaller LLMs sorta fine. | | |
| |
| ▲ | lacunary 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | does your workplace allow recording coworkers without their permission? | | |
| ▲ | hightrix 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | In the office? No. But at lunch or outside of the office is not controlled by work place policy. |
| |
| ▲ | tartoran 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You could always say you're not comfortable being processed and uploaded to Meta. If they wear the glasses at their desks replacing their screen , that's fair game. | | | |
| ▲ | __MatrixMan__ 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I would acquit |
| |
| ▲ | scotty79 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's also an assault, with intrinsic video evidence of the crime committed. | | |
| ▲ | juleiie an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Exactly, not only you agree to any sort of harm (potentially fatal) in return by any sort of weapons that person has you can’t see, they can just do nothing and record you and you have problems with police and serve short sentence even. This is all children talk here. Seriously people stop being so edgy on the internet and what you wouldn’t do. Use your god damn brain | |
| ▲ | jmye 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, cops will jump right on someone getting slapped. That definitely sounds like reality. Good call. Do you guys ever like, go outside? |
| |
| ▲ | Aeglaecia 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | while noble, basically any western system will punish such behaviour as assault ... perhaps this point could be expressed as a prefererence for the law to change such that deprivation of privacy becomes a valid self defense argument ... in the meantime there do exist passive defenses such as face masks designed to interfere with facial recognition |
|
|
| ▲ | WD-42 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Take out your phone, hold it up, and record them back. Get others to do it too for extra comical effect. Honestly I’d love to hear from someone who actually owns one of these things how doing this is any different than using the glasses. |
| |
| ▲ | noah_buddy 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This seems like the most obvious, legal, and direct way to stigmatize use of these glasses. Put a phone up to their face and say “I might be recording you.” | | |
| ▲ | WD-42 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Exactly. If you do this and the wearer says something like “I’m not even recording bro” the perfect response is “I’m not either” |
| |
| ▲ | transfer92 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | and turn on the flashlight while recording |
|
|
| ▲ | dylan604 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've always wanted to sew very bright IR LEDs into a hat that would blind a camera. Your face would naturally be shadowed by the bill of the hat as that's its intended purpose. The IR would hopefully make the camera want to adjust shutter speed and gain/ISO while assuming a fixed aperture lens. |
| |
| ▲ | jim33442 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | There was a fictional version of this in the Artemis Fowl books. My old camcorder picked up a lot of IR outside of visible range, but I think newer sensors are much less susceptible to this. | |
| ▲ | kungp an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Wasn't there something about how the LIDAR in self-driving cars destroys camera sensors? | | | |
| ▲ | skillina 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Depends what your threat model is, but this will literally turn you into a glowing signal that says "hey, look at me!" Your face might be protected but anyone manually reviewing security footage will be paying way more attention. | | |
| ▲ | dylan604 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | When did we change the subject from fucking the Meta to hiding from security cameras? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 1659447091 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Are there any less obviously aggressive tactics we can use? If you are in the US, and hopefully in a state that is open to blocking this sort of thing, be very vocal and persistent with your state reps about the issue. Get others to join. I am curious if this will be legal within the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act or a couple other states with similar laws |
|
| ▲ | IG_Semmelweiss an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| water to the face ? Would that work ? Seems benign enough that its not going to earn you a visit to the judge, but should disable most electronics, no? |
|
| ▲ | Bender an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Email corporate security and the chief privacy officer with logs of who is wearing spy glasses. Remind them Facebook controls where that data is stored and who has access to it. Ask how to respond to auditors inquiring about it leave off, "in the future audits". - Or - Walk around with a vlogger camera that has a large microphone. If anyone takes issue, say "I'm the 5th person here walking around recording everyone today. The others are using a spy camera in their glasses." - Or - Borrow a pair of them when in public at a restaurant and loudly say, "Oh my god! These AI smart glasses really do remove everyone's clothing, even on the children!" be ready to run. _________________ Only do these things if you typically rock the boat regardless. i.e. often try and fail to get fired or arrested. |
|
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
