Yikes, sorry guys (I'm a mod here). I've marked his account (and yours!) legit so this won't happen again.

It's my least favorite thing about HN that high-quality new accounts, such as founders jumping into threads about their work, sometimes get throttled by the software. Gah.

What about some form of external auditing down the line to add legitimacy to these honeypot claims? Maybe open sourcing the technology as well?

> but I would argue that my background made me uniquely situated to understand and care about these problems deeply enough to spend years of my life building a company in response.

Maybe but this line of argumentation also opens the door to more criticism. Anyone looking at Palantir from the outside only knows their reputation and involvement in unsavory projects before taking a job. You chose to take the job with that knowledge covering most of your field of view. You stayed to work for that company contributing to that kind of work. That's a signal that's brighter than the valuable experience you gathered there. Tech can be learned but the values needed to support or even tolerate Palantir's activities don't get easily changed.

The premise of your company pivots on trust, not technology, the same tech is known and available to everyone else too. And it's trust in you that you will do what you say, not that you can do what you say. The latter is a given, you clearly have the knowhow. The former is putting any promise in doubt.

> Cape routes your traffic through our US-based mobile core.

This sounds like an anti-feature when it comes to privacy or the paranoid.

> I say "Cape is not a honeypot" a lot just so I don't appear to be mincing words.

I appreciate you saying it but Crypto AG probably also said that a lot (figuratively).

> Cape does not keep this data.

Unfortunately you are limited in what you can do here. Having or processing this data for any amount of time, even without keeping it, puts you in the position to be compelled to provide it.