| ▲ | jeroenhd 9 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreating Aqua is the easy part. Recreating all the applications you would use day-to-day to fit the design language specified by Aqua is another. Apple's visual OS design was never that far ahead of the curve, but they managed to convince developers for their platform to stick to their guidelines rather than reinvent the wheel, making the entire computer feel more like one integrated system than a toolbox filled with differently branded tools. This is also why most "windows style" themes fall flat: you can copy the window decorations, button backgrounds, and icons, but unless your applications are designed to look and work like the OS your mimicking, it'll all just look weird and off. At this point "operating systems" in a commercial sense are so large that only relatively new entries can afford to rebuild their stock applications to fit the current UI theme (ChromeOS comes pretty close but you'd need to appreciate Google's design to enjoy that). macOS, Windows, and even Linux to some extent all have decades of old software to support so they can't redesign their core GUI stack without breaking everything. In the days that an internet browser wasn't considered a core part of the operating system, there just weren't as many places to get the design wrong or off-template without Q&A noticing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | overfeed 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> they managed to convince developers for their platform to stick to their guidelines rather than reinvent the wheel, making the entire computer feel more like one integrated system than a toolbox filled with differently branded tools. Browsing the web on non-Apple platforms was annoying for a few years, with web designers aping the skeuomorphic design-language of whatever the then-current MacOS X release was. Besides cargo-culting, there was no justifiable reason for brushed aluminum or linen web page backgrounds, though I'm sure it looked really great on the designers Apple computer. If you, dear reader, did this when you were younger, I hope you have grown as a person and a designer. > [...] unless your applications are designed to look and work like the OS your mimicking, it'll all just look weird and off. Exactly! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alexpotato 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> but they managed to convince developers for their platform to stick to their guidelines rather than reinvent the wheel This attention to detail and "one integrated system" leads me to my favorite MacOS story: - Windows and Linux machines would always DHCP for IP addresses - MacOS would see if you had connected to the network before and just reuse the old IP you had under the assumption that is was probably still valid - This worked most of the time and if you turned on a Mac and Windows laptop at the same time, the Mac would have a working IP first As someone pointed out, this was probably one of the reasons why MacOS users would often say it just "felt better" than Windows. The fact that Mac owned both hardware AND software and treated it as a holistic system led to an overall better user experience. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||