> LLM output is expressly prohibited for any direct communication

I would like to see this more. As a heavy user of LLMs I still write 100% of my own communication. Do not send me something an LLM wrote, if I wanted to read LLM outputs, I would ask an LLM.

I’m glad they have a carve out for using LLMs to translate to, or fix up English communications. LLMs are a great accessibility tool that is making open source development truly global. Translation and grammar fix up is something LLMs are very, very good at!

But that is translation, not “please generate a pull request message for these changes.”

I completely agree. I let LLMs write a ton of my code, but I do my own writing.

It's actually kind of a weird "of two minds" thing. Why should I care that my writing is my own, but not my code?

The only explanation I have is that, on some level, the code is not the thing that matters. Users don't care how the code looks, they just care that the product works. Writing, on the other hand, is meant to communicate something directly from me, so it feels like there's something lost if I hand that job over to AI.

I often think of this quote from Ted Chiang's excellent story The Truth Of Fact, The Truth of Feeling:

> As he practiced his writing, Jijingi came to understand what Moseby had meant: writing was not just a way to record what someone said; it could help you decide what you would say before you said it. And words were not just the pieces of speaking; they were the pieces of thinking. When you wrote them down, you could grasp your thoughts like bricks in your hands and push them into different arrangements. Writing let you look at your thoughts in a way you couldn’t if you were just talking, and having seen them, you could improve them, make them stronger and more elaborate.”

But there is obviously some kind of tension in letting an LLM write code for me but not prose - because can't the same quote apply to my code?

I can't decide if there really is a difference in kind between prose and code that justifies letting the LLM write my code, or if I'm just ignoring unresolved cognitive dissonance because automating the coding part of my job is convenient.

Relevant: https://noslopgrenade.com

Yeah I use LLMs to show me how to shorten my emails because I can type for days. It helps a lot for when I feel like I just need a short concise email but I still write it all myself.

I see this on Reddit a lot. Someone will vibe code something then spam a bunch of subreddits with LLM marketing text. It’s all low effort low quality sooo.

yeah, you could ask a LLM, but are you sure you know what to ask?

like in that joke with the mechanic which demands $100 for hitting the car once with his wrench

Same can go for LLM code. I don't want to review your code if it was written by an LLM

I only use LLM to write text/communication because that's the part I don't like about my work