I thought Eric Traut was famous for his pioneering work in virtualization, TIL he has Pyright fame too !

For some reason a lot of people are unaware that Claude Code is proprietary.

I appreciate the sentiment but I’m giving OpenAI 0 credit for anything open source, given their founding charter and how readily it was abandoned when it became clear the work could be financially exploited.

At this point I just assume Claude Code isn't OSS out of embarrassment for how poor the code actually is. I've got a $200/mo claude subscription I'm about to cancel out of frustration with just how consistently broken, slow, and annoying to use the claude CLI is.

Their compaction endpoint is far and away the best in the industry. Claude's has to be dead last.

Is it possible to use the compactor endpoint independently? I have my own agent loop i maintain for my domain specific use case. We built a compaction system, but I imagine this is better performance.

How does this work for other models that aren’t OpenAI models

It depends on the API path. Chat completions does what you describe, however isn't it legacy?

I've only used codex with the responses v1 API and there it's the complete opposite. Already generated reasoning tokens even persist when you send another message (without rolling back) after cancelling turns before they have finished the thought process

Also with responses v1 xhigh mode eats through the context window multiples faster than the other modes, which does check out with this.

I made a skill that reflects on past conversations via parallel headless codex sessions. Its great for context building. Repo: https://github.com/olliepro/Codex-Reflect-Skill

This is effective and it's convenient to have all that stuff co-located with the code, but I've found it causes problems in team environments or really anywhere where you want to be able to work on multiple branches concurrently. I haven't come up with a good answer yet but I think my next experiment is to offload that stuff to a daemon with external storage, and then have a CLI client that the agent (or a human) can drive to talk to it.

where do you save the progress updates in? and do you delete them afterwards or do you have like 100+ progress updates each time you have claude or codex implement a feature or change?

I’ve been using agent-shell in emacs a lot and it stores transcripts of the entire interaction. It’s helped me out lot of times because I can say ‘look at the last transcript here’.

It’s not the responsibility of the agent to write this transcript, it’s emacs, so I don’t have to worry about the agent forgetting to log something. It’s just writing the buffer to disk.

Same here! I think it would be good if this could be made by default by the tooling. I've seen others using SQL for the same and even the proposal for a succinct way of representing this handoff data in the most compact way.

That could explain the "churn" when it gets stuck. Do you think it needs to maintain an internal state over time to keep track of longer threads, or are written notes enough to bridge the gap?

I don't think this is true.

I'm pretty sure that Codex uses reasoning.encrypted_content=true and store=false with the responses API.

reasoning.encrypted_content=true - The server will return all the reasoning tokens in an encrypted blob you can pass along in the next call. Only OpenaAI can decrypt them.

store=false - The server will not persist anything about the conversation on the server. Any subsequent calls must provide all context.

Combined the two above options turns the responses API into a stateless one. Without these options it will still persist reasoning tokens in a agentic loop, but it will be done statefully without the client passing the reasoning along each time.

but that's why I like Codex CLI, it's so bare bone and lightweight that I can build lots tools on top of it. persistent thinking tokens? let me have that using a separate file the AI writes to. the reasoning tokens we see aren't the actual tokens anyway; the model does a lot more behind the scenes but the API keeps them hidden (all providers do that).

I think this explains why I'm not getting the most out of codex, I like to interrupt and respond to things i see in reasoning tokens.

Gemini CLI has this

They routinely mention in GitHub that they heavily prioritize based on "upvotes" (emoji reacts) in GitHub issues, and they close issues that don't receive many. So if you want this, please "upvote" those issues.

I think this should be called the Homer Simpson loop, it seems more apt

Amp uses Gemini 3 Flash to explore code first. That's model is a great speed/intelligence trade-off especially for that use case.

Which Gpt model and reasoning level did you use in Codex and Amp?

Generally I have noticed Gpt 5.2 codex is slower compared to Sonnet 4.5 in Claude Code.

What is your general flow with amp? I plan to try it out myself and have been on the fences for a while.

I found codex cli to be significantly better than claude code. It follows instructions and executes the exact change I want without going off on an "adventure" like Claude code. Also the 20 dollars per month sub tier gives very generous limits of the most powerful model option (5.2 codex high).

I work on SSL bio acoustic models as context.

OpenCode also has an extremely fast and reliable UI compared to the other CLIs. I’ve been using Codex more lately since I’m cancelling my Claude Pro plan and it’s solid but haven’t spent nearly as much time compared to Claude Code or Gemini CLI yet.

But tbh OpenAI openly supporting OpenCode is the bigger draw for me on the plan but do want to spend more time with native Codex as a base of comparison against OpenCode when using the same model.

I’m just happy to have so many competitive options, for now at least.

I strongly agree. The memory and cpu usage of codex-cli is also extremely good. That codex-cli is open source is also valuable because you can easily get definitive answers to any questions about its behavior.

I also was annoyed by Theo saying that.

It's pretty good, yeah. I get coherent results >95% of the time (on well-known problems).

However, it seems to really only be good at coding tasks. Anything even slightly out of the ordinary, like planning dialogue and plot lines it almost immediately starts producing garbage.

I did get it stuck in a loop the other day. I half-assed a git rebase and asked codex to fix it. It did eventually resolve all debased commits, but it just kept going. I don't really know what it was doing, I think it made up some directive after the rebase completed and it just kept chugging until I pulled the plug.

The only other tool I've tried is Aider, which I have found to be nearly worthless garbage

The problem with codex right now is it doesn't have hook support. It's hard to understate how big of a deal hooks are, the Ralph loop that the newer folks are losing their shit over is like the level 0, most rudimentary use of hooks.

I have a tool that reduces agent token consumption by 30%, and it's only viable because I can hook the harness and catch agents being stupid, then prompt them to be smarter on the fly. More at https://sibylline.dev/articles/2026-01-22-scribe-swebench-be...

Same goes for Claude Code. Literally has vim bindings for editing prompts if you want them.

It does, it's just a bit annoying.

I have this set up as a shell script (or you could make it an alias):

    codex --config model="gpt-oss-120b" --config model_provider=custom

    [model_providers.custom]
    name = "Llama-swap Local Service"
    base_url = "http://localhost:8080/v1"
    http_headers = { "Authorization" = "Bearer sk-123456789" }
    wire_api = "chat"

    # Default model configuration
    model = "gpt-oss-120b"
    model_provider = "custom"

Great achievement. What did you learn?