| ▲ | kburman 6 hours ago |
| My rule for modern TVs:
1. Never connect the TV panel itself to the internet. Keep it air-gapped. Treat it solely as a dumb monitor. 2. Use an Apple TV for the "smart" features. 3. Avoid Fire TV, Chromecast, or Roku. The logic is simple, Google (Chromecast) and Amazon (Fire TV) operate on the same business model as the TV manufacturers subsidized hardware in exchange for user data and ad inventory. Apple is the only mainstream option where the hardware cost covers the experience, rather than your viewing habits subsidizing the device. [Copied my comment from here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46268844#46271740] |
|
| ▲ | kstrauser 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's exactly my own thought process. I don't pretend that Apple is saintly, but their profit model is currently to make money through premium prices on premium products. They have a lot to lose, like several trillion dollars, in betraying that trust. |
| |
| ▲ | rafaelmn 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A large % of their revenue comes from app store/services and they have incentives to lock you into the ecosystem, sell you digital shit and take a cut off of everything. I saw an ad for apple gaming service in my iphone system settings recently ! That's not to say that Google isn't worse but let's not pretend Apple is some saint here or that their incentives are perfectly aligned with the users. Hardware growth has peaked, they will be forced to milk you on services to keep growing revenue. Personally I'm looking forward to Steam Deck, if that gets annoying with SteamOS - it's a PC built for Linux, there's going to be something available. | | | |
| ▲ | DetectDefect 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I don't pretend that Apple is saintly, but their profit model is currently to make money through premium prices on premium products Is this statement based on anything other than Apple marketing materials, perhaps a meaningful qualification from an independent third party? I worry this falsehood is being repeated so much it has become "truth". | | |
| ▲ | tracerbulletx 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | What falsehood? That apple's profit mix is much less advertising than its competitors is just a fact about their incentives in the moment. He didn't really go all that far in claiming anything beyond that being better than the alternative of being mostly an advertising company. | |
| ▲ | drnick1 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For some reason, some people have this inexplicable rose-tinted vision of Apple. Until they release the source code of their products, the only rational stance is to treat their software as malware. If further evidence is necessary, any Apple device that I have owned pings multiple Apple domains several times per minute, despite disabling every cloud dependency that can be disabled. The roles of the domains are partially documented, but traffic is encrypted and it is impossible to know for sure what information Apple is exfiltrating. It is certainly a lot more than a periodic software update check. It certainly seems that Apple is documenting how people interact with the devices they own very closely. That's an insane amount of oversight over people's lives considering that some (most?) people use their phones as their primary computer. | | |
| ▲ | DetectDefect an hour ago | parent [-] | | I just opened Activity Monitor - a process called "dasd" is the 5th largest consumer of CPU time. What does it do? Apple does not want you to know. Apple also will not let you disable it. Apple will not even tell you if this process is legitimate (it is signed by "Software Signing" lmao). $ man dasd
No manual entry for dasd
There are like two dozen processes like this, half of which open network connections despite me never invoking any Apple services or even built-in apps. macOS has basically become malware. | | |
| |
| ▲ | kstrauser 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, but it certainly rhymes. Is there proof that Apple is monetizing our data with third parties? It's very clear how almost every other major company is, but Apple's been reasonably respectful about it. | | |
| ▲ | AlotOfReading 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Google is also vehemently opposed to selling your data to third parties. That's how they keep themselves as the middleman between advertisers and users. What they do is allow detailed behavioral targeting. Apple prefers to expose contextual targeting data to advertising instead. Apple is also better about not letting advertisers run random scripts. But frankly the difference between the two companies seems more a matter of degree than kind. It's not like Apple has a strong, principled stance against collecting data. They have a strong principled stance against other ad networks collecting user data, which looks a lot like anticompetitiveness. Their first party software collects identifiable data on you regardless of whether you opt out. They just avoid using that to target you if you opt out. The reason Apple says their advertising doesn't track you is because they define "tracking" as purchasing third party data, not first party data collection. | |
| ▲ | DetectDefect an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Is there proof that Apple is monetizing our data with third parties? Other than a history replete of cooperation with domestic and foreign state surveillance, which in exchange allow its market position, you mean? | |
| ▲ | saagarjha 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They’re certainly monetizing your data with first parties |
| |
| ▲ | daveguy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Repeating "this falsehood" doesn't make it a falsehood either. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | flutas 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My only * to this would be Google Chromecast devices directly if you already have them. They have an option (buried way under settings) to make the home-screen apps only. > Turn on Apps only mode
> From the Google TV home screen, select Settings Settings and then Accounts & Sign In.
> Select your profile and then Apps only mode and then Turn on. It also makes the device significantly more performant. |
| |
| ▲ | xnx 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Great tip! I'd been using a custom launcher, but with this, I might not have to. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | sfRattan 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| With a bit of fiddling, Android TV can be as good as Apple TV in terms of privacy. Not out of the box, of course, but ADB can remove advertising/surveillance related APK files from most devices sold in big box stores and there are open-source, alternative clients to YouTube and a few other platforms available due to the popularity on the underlying AOSP platform. The same is possible to varying extents on smart TVs that use Android TV as their OS. You can even completely replace Google's sponsored-content-feed launcher/homescreen with an open source alternative that is just a grid of big tiles for your installed apps (FLauncher). For me, SmartTube with both ad-blocking and sponsor block is the killer feature of Android TV as a platform. If you're into local network media streaming, Jellyfin's Android TV app is also great. Their Apple TV app is limited enough that people recommend using a paid third party client instead. And that's usually inevitably the case with Apple's walled gardens... The annual developer fee means things that people would build for the community on AOSP/Android are locked behind purchases or subscriptions on iOS and Apple TV. |
|
| ▲ | skirmish 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Another safe option I use: Vero V [1], it runs Debian + Kodi, so it is all open source. Great support by Sam, the founder, too. [1] https://osmc.tv/vero/ |
| |
| ▲ | drnick1 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I like the idea, but these KODI-based devices far too limited, they essentially only serve as media players for local content. For example, streaming Youtube is difficult and a poor experience relative using VacuumTube on desktop Linux. It's even harder to get a browser to work to stream from websites like Pluto and Flixer, especially if you want an adblocker. I haven't found a better option than an upscaled Linux DE on a mini-PC so far (however, see KDE Plasma Bigscreen). Also, you can buy a more capable used ThinkCenter micro for less money, so the value proposition isn't exactly great. | | |
| ▲ | RunningDroid an hour ago | parent [-] | | > I like the idea, but these KODI-based devices far too limited, they essentially only serve as media players for local content. This seems to be a side effect of KODI's extreme aversion to being associated with piracy. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | helterskelter 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I believe HDMI has support for sharing internet since 1.4 and I wouldn't be surprised to see TV makers attempting to leverage this in the future to get around not connecting your TV directly to internet. |
| |
| ▲ | mrpippy 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | HDMI Ethernet Channel fizzled out and no devices ever supported it. | | |
| ▲ | lithiumii 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | No. I had a Samsung TV which connects to the internet via the HDMI cable to my Nvidia Shield. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nunez 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 100%. Confirmed by my Firewalla. These and HomePods only access apple.com and icloud.com domains unless you're using apps. No mysterious hard coded IP addresses. Apple TV also has the best hardware, by far. |
|
| ▲ | blibble an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| they'll probably start using that bezos spy doorbell mesh network soon then the only thing to do will be to rip out the antenna |
|
| ▲ | amelius 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Once many people start doing this, there will be dark patterns to force you to connect to the internet. |
| |
| ▲ | wvenable 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It won't be long before products like this just get cellular modems built in. | | |
| ▲ | yen223 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Looking forward to free internet courtesy of the surveillance state | | |
| ▲ | alchemism an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | They generously offer you a free SIM card when going through passport control in Dubai. I can’t think of any other reason to do that, besides pure benevolence. | |
| ▲ | wvenable 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I read an article a few years ago about someone using a SIM card embedded in a product like this for free internet. The connection was severely limited though. |
|
| |
| ▲ | sneak 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There already are on Sony TVs. My roommate is always connecting it when I’m away and I have to factory reset it and go through the dark pattern to use it without WiFi. | |
| ▲ | nickthegreek 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | how so? describe an example please. | | |
| ▲ | tempay 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Prompt for a login or to check for updates on every start or once a week. It wouldn’t be difficult to get the numbers up for the number of online devices. | |
| ▲ | ytch 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Similar to Windows 11 force you to login with Microsoft Account during install? | |
| ▲ | fzzzy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | ship a cell phone in every TV | | |
| ▲ | tomjakubowski 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | What would be the monthly cost per unit to LG for servicing those cell modems? Data-only, and I presume they could get some kind of bulk discount as a big manufacturer. | | |
| ▲ | datadrivenangel 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | probably a couple of dollars a month, which would be very tough to actually make work. Even facebook only makes a few hundred dollars a year per person in the US. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | kibwen 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Apple is the only mainstream option where the hardware cost covers the experience, rather than your viewing habits subsidizing the device. Years ago our refrain was "if you're not paying for the service, you're the product". Nowadays we all recognize how naive that was; why would these psychopathic megacorporations overlook the possibility of both charging us and selling our privacy to the highest bidder? In other words, Apple doesn't have a pass here. They're profiting from your data too, in addition to charging you the usual Apple tax. Why wouldn't they? Apple's a psychopathic megacorporation just like all the rest of them, whose only goal is to generate profit at any cost. |
|
| ▲ | userbinator 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What happened to having an HTPC? |
| |
| ▲ | nunez an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Not user friendly and required dedicated hardware (TV tuners). Governing bodies also couldn't agree on HTPC standards, like Play4Sure, causing even more confusion. Plex and Sonarr/Radar are gaining some steam though. | |
| ▲ | richid 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | For me: I want something that will always work with minimal effort and is easy to use for the family. I've farted around with every HTPC software from MythTV on and I'm over it. I'll happily pay the premium for an AppleTV that will handle almost everything in hardware. | | |
| ▲ | reactordev 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I solved this with a wireless keyboard and a Kensington trackball mouse running pure Fedora with scaling set to 200% in KDE Plasma. Who needs a frontend? Just open brave. | | |
| ▲ | rasmus-kirk 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I would honestly just use an Apple TV. But the killer feature for me (I currently use a Steam Deck/Steam Controller) is just Youtube without ads reliably. Also total control, if Youtube jacked up the prices for Youtube Red, I always have Ublock. | | |
| ▲ | reactordev 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Total control is the name of the game for me. I can load Steam. I can load Brave. I can load VLC. I can watch any streaming, play any game (proton supported), or listen to any music. |
|
| |
| ▲ | iancmceachern 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Jellyfin is pretty good | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pengaru 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If these things include WiFi hw it's not so simple. You'd likely be surprised what proprietary WiFi-enabled consumer products do without your knowledge. Especially in a dense residential environment, there's nothing preventing a neighbor's WiFi AP giving internet access to everything it deems eligible within range. It may be a purely behind the scenes facility, on an otherwise ostensibly secured AP. |
| |
| ▲ | mh- 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I see this claim posted a lot, and not a single person has ever provided evidence of it happening with any TV brand I've ever heard of. | | |
| ▲ | pengaru 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't have firsthand knowledge of TVs doing this, but other consumer devices with WiFi most definitely do this. If you don't control the software driving the TV, and the TV has WiFi hardware, I would assume it's at the very least in the cards. It's rationalized by the vendors as a service to the customer. The mobile app needs to be able to configure the device via the cloud, so increasing the ability for said device to reach cloud by whatever means necessary is a customer benefit. | | |
| ▲ | mh- 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I've never seen evidence of a mainstream consumer device doing this either. Got some examples I can look at? | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Is Amazon Sidewalk still a thing? | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It most certainly is. It's not wifi, but it's definitely a thing. It lives down in the 900MHz world where things tend to be slower, but also travel further. And of course: If it exists, it can be used. That said, I haven't seen any evidence that suggests that televisions and streaming boxes are using it. |
| |
| ▲ | pengaru 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you're in SF we should have that conversation over a beer. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | lillecarl 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You're suggesting that my TV would connect to a random open WiFi, it sounds far fetched | | |
| ▲ | cma 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | At some point it will potentially connect to people walking by on the street (Amazon Sidewalk). For now they haven't hooked Fire TVs into it. | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 30 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Amazon Sidewalk is more about things connecting to the neighbor's always-plugged-in Echo Dot speaker than it is about them connecting to people walking down literal sidewalks. |
| |
| ▲ | pengaru 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | As a thought exercise ask yourself would you notice if any of your closed WiFi-enabled hw scanned for APs and occasionally phoned home, if it didn't go out of its way to inform you of this? What would prevent the vendor from doing so? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | CivBase 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Use an Apple TV for the "smart" features. Use a PC for "smart" features. Used PC hardware is cheap and plenty effective. And the Logitech K400 is better than any TV remote. No spying (unless you run Windows). Easy ad blocking. No reliance on platform-specific app support. Native support for multiple simultaneous content feeds (windows) - even from different services. And it's not like it's complicated. My parents are as tech-illiterate as they come and they've been happily using an HTPC setup for over well over a decade. Anyone who can operate a "Smart TV" can certainly use a web browser. |