> And I'm being generous when I say "pretty": I have never encountered it in any job or even in academia. People know of it. They just don't use it for work.

To my knowledge, at least in academia, Wolfram (Mathematica) seems to be used quite a bit by physicists. Also in some areas of mathematics it is used (but many mathematicians seems to prefer Maple). Concerning mathematical research, I want to mention that by now also some open-source (and often more specialized) CASs seem to have become more widespread, such as SageMath, SymPy, Macaulay2, GP/PARI or GAP.

▲

jjgreen 4 hours ago | parent [-]

In Maple sin(x) is "sin(x)", in Mathematica it's "Sin[x]", ewww

▲

pmkary 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I actually loved this idea so much that every language I make, I try to do the same. The point of it is that typing ( requires shift, while [ does not. And you have no idea when you have tunnel syndrome, how much it hurts each time you write a (. While it’s ugly, the hand thanks you for it.

▲

SSLy 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> The point of it is that typing ( requires shift, while [ does not.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xkeyboard-config/xkeyboard-co...

Now, I really could've used something like this on macOS…

Karabiner to the rescue https://genesy.github.io/karabiner-complex-rules-generator/#...

▲

esafak an hour ago | parent [-]

As everybody knows ...

	▲	SSLy 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I use(d) arch btw

▲

aleph_minus_one 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In my opinion, Wolfram/Mathematica is more consistent internally, while Maple is more consistent with the usual mathematical notation.

▲

DonHopkins 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> while Maple is more consistent with the usual mathematical notation

I can't tell if you're saying that as if it's a good thing, or a bad thing.

	▲	aleph_minus_one 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's not about good nor bad, but about the different trade-offs that these two CASs made. What is more important for you is something that you can only answer for yourself.