| ▲ | Have I been Flocked? – Check if your license plate is being watched(haveibeenflocked.com) |
| 224 points by pkaeding 12 hours ago | 122 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | ifh-hn 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Since the page is currently down and I have no idea what flocked means in the context of license plates, can I assume this is US specific? |
| |
| ▲ | KomoD 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "Flock Safety" is a company that makes "ALPR" cameras (automated license plate recognition, in reality they go far beyond just reading license plates), they've been getting a lot of attention recently because people are worried about privacy and abuse. There's a bunch of articles about them here: https://www.404media.co/tag/flock/ | | | |
| ▲ | reactordev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://deflock.me | |
| ▲ | iso1631 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | ANPR cameras which the rest of the world (and apparently America) have had for decades have recently become big news in America, I believe because they're now being used for immigration purposes? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_number-plate_recogni... I'm not sure why these are so bad but generally everyone loves things like Ring cameras which do the same thing but with people rather than vehicles. I suspect there's something in the American Psyche and how they treat cars, and the inherent trust of the billionaires and distrust of "The Feds" | | |
| ▲ | slickdifferent 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it's mostly just a privacy issue. The idea that your every movement is being recorded by the government is Orwellian, especially when they try to hide its existence, lie about its capabilities, and you have no say in the matter (referencing NSA metadata monitoring). The average person thinks their ring camera is like their coffee maker, an individual piece of technology they own and control. If it were released that everyone's ring cameras were being fed into some NSA program running facial recognition to track citizens movement I'm sure they would be upset about that too. | | |
| ▲ | lynx97 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Did you somehow miss the introduction of mobile phones? Came out of a coma recently? |
| |
| ▲ | rescripting 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It’s trivial for law enforcement to track your movement with ALPR cameras. Information feeds into a single database, paid for by law enforcement agencies, and they just connect the dots. Ring camera footage requires law enforcement to get a warrant or for individuals to give consent to supply the footage. Now tell me which system makes it easier for a cop to stalk their ex. | | |
| ▲ | SauciestGNU 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | There was an article posted recently announcing that Flock reached an agreement with Amazon to ingest Ring cameras into their system. | |
| ▲ | thih9 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | All this is assuming one travels exclusively by car. Bikes, public transport, or walking are not as easy to track using this system. Then again, these modes of transport are less popular in the US; I guess such a surveillance system is extra effective in the US because of that. | |
| ▲ | ifh-hn an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | This comment went right off a cliff at the end... | | |
| ▲ | saint_yossarian an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Why do you think so? LOVEINT is indeed a thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOVEINT | | |
| ▲ | ifh-hn an hour ago | parent [-] | | I know it's a thing. That was just my reaction reading the OP. First paragraph: reasonable, if ignoring that access it not likely to be unrestricted willy-nilly. Second paragraph: not as reasonable given that Amazon likely comply without issue with us intelligence, and sell the data to third parties, which the police could just buy (similar has been done) to avoid consent or legal obstacles. Third paragraph: out of nowhere, focus on police. No mention of intelligence agency staff or say Amazon staff doing the same thing. I just had a wee chuckle to myself was all. | | |
| ▲ | Dusseldorf 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Out of nowhere? The entire comment is talking about law enforcement (police) and law enforcement agencies (police departments) purchasing access to commercially owned surveillance databases. No warrant is required to use them, and in some cases that access is indeed "unrestricted willy-nilly." |
|
| |
| ▲ | lingrush4 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | If a police officer potentially stalking his ex is the worst failure mode this guy can come up with, let's keep the Flock cameras. With the right access controls and approval processes, that can be fully solved in a week. | | |
| ▲ | hansvm 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Ah, you mean like if we had some sort of knowledgeable, impartial third-party to grant the police permissions. They could, get this, "judge" whether the absolute bare minimum of evidence is likely to exist. So long as Flock didn't provide a way to circumvent an approval process like that, you could maybe reduce the instances of abusers stalking their victims to "acceptable" levels. What do you think the chances are that we could invent a system like that? You don't think Flock and the police would find a way to circumvent it do you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | tptacek 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Besides the obvious privacy concern: at the very least in my state (Illinois), it's not lawful for public bodies to disclose the license plate numbers read from ALPR cameras, so this data set is necessarily incomplete. But, give it a year or two, and you can replace this whole website with a black background and 72 point white bold text "YES". |
| |
| ▲ | diydsp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Rule 1. Do not comply in advance. Do not accept it as inevitable. Do not give away your power without friction. | |
| ▲ | mycall 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | * While our most recent data is from 12/4/2025, there may be significant historical gaps. * Most agencies don't proactively publish audit logs
Records requests can take months or years to fulfill
Some agencies heavily redact their logs * We may not have requested logs from your local agencies yet | |
| ▲ | hopelite 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is already case law that makes the records collected by government through these methods no different than any other public records, especially since they are publicly visible license plate numbers. That has its own problems because it shields/deflects from the bigger issue of being treasonous, i.e., grotesque violation of the law of the Constitution, through mass surveillance that has also already been abused for various kinds of criminal acts by law enforcement. | |
| ▲ | calvinmorrison 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Flock is a private company, right. That's the whole schtick. Like, Flock can retain records indefinitely for example, they may sell those records to the government but they're a private party. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | What's your point? To the extent they're a private company you're even less likely to get access to records from Flock ALPR cameras. | | |
| ▲ | bigbuppo 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Just because the records created on behalf of the government are held by a private enterprise doesn't mean they aren't government records. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Right, I agree. My point is that the FOIA laws of many states forbid disclosing the data this web page purports to surface. | |
| ▲ | specialist 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes but: Privatization is an effective way to negate the public's right know. eg Some companies have claimed trade secret protections to prevent public access. Infamously, election administration vendors like Diebold. I imagine anyone trying to investigate govt activities conducted by Palantir (for example) will run into similar stonewalling. Even getting the fulltext of contracts can be challenging. | | |
| ▲ | diydsp 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not automatically. There's aleeady case law(0x1) that ruled that images captured by Flock ALPR cameras are public records, even though the data are stored by Flock (a private vendor), not directly by the city. The court rejected the notion that “because the data sits on a private server, it’s not a public record.” Instead, it said that since the surveillance is paid for by the public (taxpayers) and used by a public agency, the data must comply with the state’s public-records law. This shows that — in at least one jurisdiction — using a private company to run ALPRs doesn’t shield the data from public-records requests. (0x1) https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/washington-court-rules... |
|
| |
| ▲ | calvinmorrison 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > at the very least in my state (Illinois), it's not lawful for public bodies to disclose the license plate numbers read from ALPR cameras, so this data set is necessarily incomplete. They're not a public body, that was my point | | |
| ▲ | hopelite 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | They de facto are because they only place cameras in public places and on public land by contract with the government in one form or another; be it with a treasonous sheriff or a treasonous state executive and legislature. The public would not be talking about Flock if they had not worked to create a treasonous surveillance state and instead only did things like monitored truck movements in a logistics depot. The private contracts for things like HOA neighborhoods and corporations, e.g., big box store loss prevention and customer data tracking, but those’s are a totally different issue that have nothing to do with the use of public funds and power for mass surveillance. | | |
| ▲ | RHSeeger 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This feels a lot like "Yeah, but we'll do it anyways until a court makes us stop; because the profit is more than the fine" | |
| ▲ | immibis 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | but thry're not literally the government and the relevant laws only affect the literal government. | | |
| ▲ | svnt an hour ago | parent [-] | | No, there is legal precedent that private companies who perform government services are subject to the same laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | pilingual 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Put up billboards around metros with a license plate reader that queries this database with each passing car and announce "White Tesla Model Y XYZ-1234 You've been focked for: Inv" What a sick society we live in. |
| |
| ▲ | VoidWhisperer 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This unfortunately wouldn't work quite as well in states where cars arent required to have a front facing license plate (like florida) | | |
| ▲ | kmoser 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The camera could be separate from the billboard, and point at the backs of the cars. The billboard would be a short distance past that. | |
| ▲ | overfeed 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Flock cameras are oriented to read rear plates. One would need a camera similarly configured + a billboard some distance in front, or perhaps 2 billboards, a 1-2 setup + payoff combo, the camera behind the first billboard, and the dynamic text on the second. Pulling up other public data correlated to the plate - where legal - may make a splash. I'm thinking addressing the car owner by their first name. |
| |
| ▲ | johnebgd 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Dystopian society. |
|
|
| ▲ | nh43215rgb 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > You cannot access this site because the owner has reached their plan limits. Check back later once traffic has gone down. > If you are owner of this website, prevent this from happening again by upgrading your plan on the Cloudflare Workers dashboard. |
| |
| ▲ | xer0x 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Cloudflare making sites unavailable? | | |
| ▲ | tossit444 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No, Workers free tier is 100,000 requests/day. Considering the error is on the main page, each visit is probably taking a minimum of 10+ requests, so it can easily be overwhelmed. | | |
| ▲ | eastbound 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is genius if you work in B2C and want to prevent your website from going viral. | | |
| ▲ | NewJazz 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Does Cloudflare let you set hard limits when you are on a paid plan? Or they just do it for the free tier? | | |
| ▲ | wongarsu 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, the paid plan scales to infinity (without having to beg for limit increases like on some other clouds). But ther paid plan has a $5/month base fee, so it's tempting to stay in the free plan if you don't expect to go viral |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | beeflet 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Have I been cloudflare'd? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | amelius 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| License plate numbers are old fashioned. Can't we get something cryptographically sound? |
|
| ▲ | gotekom952 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very problematic flock security video - how easy is to hack them https://youtu.be/uB0gr7Fh6lY?si=vC2Kyl_e30kVVmXT |
|
| ▲ | ourmandave an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Visit deflock.me/map to see if you live near a camera. https://deflock.me/map |
| |
| ▲ | iJohnDoe 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Holy shit! I had no idea they were everywhere! Do they get permission or permit to install them? |
|
|
| ▲ | GaryBluto 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Slashdotted within 3 hours. |
| |
|
| ▲ | The_President an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Flock creates a dossier that allows an individual to be stalked and framed. This permits rouge users clamoring for more power to consolidate their toolkit and expedite their rise. People get framed and stolen from all the time and this will certainly make it worse. |
| |
|
| ▲ | opengrass 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have I ran out of 100,000 requests? |
| |
| ▲ | WalterSear 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Does your significant other know about your car collection? You may have a car hoarding problem. |
|
|
| ▲ | chzblck an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Oh no my super secret license plate!
definitely something that is normally hidden instead of being on the front and back of my car for anyone to see and photo. |
| |
| ▲ | dietr1ch an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure, but now there's a highly vulnerable network of cameras that reports wherever you pass to everyone way beyond the few people that saw you go around. | | |
| ▲ | chzblck 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Okay? so what. People can see that I drive? do you not think that verizon/ att /google cant see where you traveling by the phone you carry? |
| |
| ▲ | phyzome an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "Oh no, my super secret movement data, which is now being made available to a large number of people" would be more accurate. | | | |
| ▲ | chzblck 40 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Downvote all you want but adtechs like magnite, ttd, and applovin Have way more personal data on you and use it to influence. I'll take safety over ads any day of the week. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | jmward01 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder if I got a license plate holder that said 'I do not consent to selling my position information' if I could sue them. |
| |
| ▲ | 7e 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | You have no right to privacy in public, at least in the US. | | |
| ▲ | diydsp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That is oft-repeated, but case law is starting to show it's not strictly true: See Mosaic + Carpenter case which say “Yes, each scan is public; yes, aggregation is different. " Carpenter shows the Court recognizes that aggregated location data can be constitutionally significant. Individual observability vs. systemic observation:
A passerby can note a single plate at a single place/time. But a system of ALPRs, distributed spatially and continuous in time, indexed and retained, can map a person’s entire movements, associations, repeated visits, and behavioral patterns. That’s exactly the “mosaic” insight: the whole reveals things the pieces don’t. (Maynard / Jones reasoning). | |
| ▲ | edot 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | But don’t I have a right to not get stalked? | |
| ▲ | __del__ 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | clarity is good. i believe that was a reference to the futility of posting "i do not consent" messages on social media. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | habinero 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I love these kinds of sites, since they're indistinguishable from honeypots. Sure, have my license plate and the information that I'm worried about being watched. |
| |
| ▲ | AdmiralAsshat 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | With no other identifying info, though, what can they do with a license plate number in isolation? | | |
| ▲ | dragonwriter 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > With no other identifying info, though, what can they do with a license plate number in isolation? For typical users not taking extra precautions, visiting a page in a browser is providing additional identifying info, a fact that monetization of the free-as-in-beer web relies heavily upon, but which can be leveraged in other ways, e.g., by a site that draws you in with privacy fears as a technique to get you to submit additional information that can be correlated with it. | |
| ▲ | JohnFen 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In many states, car registration data is public information. If you have a license plate number, you can easily look up who the car is registered to, where they live, etc. License plate numbers are PII. | |
| ▲ | edm0nd 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You just work backwards. Here's what I would do working off just a single license plate number w OSINT. I would pivot immediately into license plate databases that have been breached. For example, ParkMobile got popped in 2021 and the db has 20.9M license plates in it. prob have low success rate and iirc its pretty US centric. It has their full name, address, phone, email, all kinda data. If you had paid fancy tools, like Lexis Nexis, you could plug it into there and easily find the owner. There are also plenty of license plate look sites online where it will tell you the VIN and make/model details. Idk, would just take digging and keep spidering out with all new info you find. Would yield a few hits eventually. | | |
| ▲ | monerozcash 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure, and so what? You can look up people on Accurint without license plates. Depending on what kind of account you have, you can just search by a zip code, or a state with no further identifiers. What would be the point of running a website collecting the license plate numbers of random visitors? | | |
| ▲ | diydsp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You need to think more evil! Lets brainstorm! Theres a parking lot... what are the 10 wealthiest car owners...and the 10 frailest oldest people... or maybe the 20 women aged 19-25 blond under 150 pounds... and when do they get off work tired, drive home each day? What's the most isolated gas station,convenience store they stop at? Ones where few other cars pass by? Who's homes don't show a 2nd car in driveway? Owned by 6'5" 200 pound man? Who frequently visits a karate studio? Or: im a car salesman, in comes a customer, whining abt lowering the price bc Theyre broke... lemme just look up where they eat supper every night! How much time they spend at airports! What school they drop off their kids! Who comes to their house? Nannies? Oh look drug dealers, i can threaten them with blackmail! Sound ridiculous? All the data brings it into focus. A local detective told me theyre focusing on robberies of $ethnicity restaurants bc that group stockpiles cash in their homes... And this is all assuming good info, but when u get creative: ..what if we look for mistakes... hey that annoying $religious neighbor pissed me off with his loud music. His kids car shows up as visiting thr wrong side of town..probably a wrong digit but lets report him anyway!!! Or:
Hey lets scan all the wifi dbs for ssids that seem like defaults, then offer them csam-insurance: you pay me $1000 cash rn and ill insure i dont browse csam from your network! And my alpr data says when youre home and your iot devs tell me when you go to sleep so we'll slip it in at before-bed-wank-time! | | |
| ▲ | monerozcash an hour ago | parent [-] | | Oh no, I can think very evil. I just don't see what kind of evil thinking would arrive at "Hey lets use this website to collect IP address/license plate pairs at a small scale" That just doesn't strike me as a very efficient way of doing evil. You can just go on accurint and find the oldest people living alone in the richest neighbourhoods near you. You can even fairly reliably find out whether or not they have living relatives. All this deeply sensitive data is already readily available. I don't think IP+license plate data would be particularly interesting unless you're Google and able to gather that at an absolutely massive scale. But even then, you'd be using it for extremely boring kinds of evil. |
| |
| ▲ | rightbyte 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pairing IPs to persons? | | |
| ▲ | monerozcash 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can just get an API which does that and skip the middle steps? Or even skip the API part and just buy that data in bulk. Or just collect it from a variety of freely leaked databases. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | pests 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Some states, like Michigan, you can request owner information (including address) by a in-person SOS visit and $15 a plate. I've always thought this should be PII and shouldn't be allowed on reddit, for example, where PII is banned. Post a driver with plate in Michigan and you may have doxxed them. | | |
| ▲ | 747fulloftapes 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is intentionally not PII. You accept this burden when you decide to register a vehicle. Keep in mind you don't need to have a license plate or to register a vehicle to drive it only on private property. Your license plate is required to be readily visible so that it can be used to find out who the registered and, presumably, responsible party is. Consider if you skip out on paying for parking at a garage, where you agreed to pay the fee by parking there in the first place. How is the business supposed to identify you to collect the money owed? Otherwise, how else would automatic private toll roads know where to send the bill? In Michigan, I believe the law only permits someone to request registration details for certain listed reasons. They don't verify that, but if you're caught submitting a fraudulent request, you can get in trouble - I don't know if it's a fine or crime. Probably depends on the circumstance. PS Hello from Grand Rapids! | |
| ▲ | antonvs 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Some states, like Michigan, you can request owner information (including address) If the car is leased, wouldn’t this just give leasing company details? | | |
| ▲ | 747fulloftapes 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, because while the leasing company may own the vehicle (known as the title holder) the vehicle will be registered in the lesser's name (known as the registered owner.) In the case of a car purchased with financing like a loan, I believe the purchaser will be both the title and registered owner, but the lender will have a lien on the vehicle until the debt is paid off. | | |
| ▲ | antonvs 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ah thanks. Permanent rental it is then. :) | | |
| ▲ | 747fulloftapes 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That, or, establish a trust to own the vehicle and grant yourself permission to use it. It's not exactly trivial to do and costs some money, but it's doable. You can do similar with an LLC, but that gets more complicated with the rules regarding using a "company" vehicle for personal purposes. IANAL Similar things are done for things like cellphone plans, firearm ownership, homes, etc. The only thing I am aware of that you can only do in your own name is register to vote. Almost all of the Michigan voter database can be FOIA'd. It's called the QVF - qualified voter file. Only a few fields in the database (ie, day and month of birth) as well as all voter records for victoms domestic battery are protected by statute. | |
| ▲ | kotaKat an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pay a thousand bucks to a Montana agent to register you an pseudoanonymous LLC and put an old 90s Corolla into an LLC with a permanent registration plate (since anything 15+ years old can have a 'perm' plate on it. Then never think about it again. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ccgreg 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Most people park at their home and many drive to work. If you have both of those data points, you can identify people. | | |
| ▲ | mertd 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's not very useful? For homeowners, the real estate transactions are public and majority of white collar people have LinkedIn accounts. | | |
| ▲ | ccgreg 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So, from home and work, you identify me. Then you figure out which church I attend, and which strip club I attend. | | |
| ▲ | interloxia 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | "Wait, user compliance scan identified location traces associated with participitation in community groups prohibited by EasyLife Health™ policy update 2025-12-06b. Recommend to annul contract." |
| |
| ▲ | jwiz 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You're starting with the plate, getting the home, and then you can get the real estate info. Most people don't expect their identity to be discoverable from their driving. | | |
| ▲ | Ylpertnodi 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Isn't that the whole idea of licence plates?
So you're identifiable? | |
| ▲ | ragequittah 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Wait really? I feel like this was happening in the 90s. Now every car has a full gps spy system integrated to the point I barely trust that my conversation is private in a modern vehicle. But I guess if you think it's just your car company, Android, Apple, roadside assistance, the local police, and probably the music you're playing that can pin your location you're probably ok. |
| |
| ▲ | drnick1 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > majority of white collar people have LinkedIn accounts. What a time to live in! | | |
| ▲ | hopelite 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | LinkedIn has always struck me like a kind of contemporary slave management/market place, only one in which pick-mes try to be the best alpha slave they can be. The fact that you are linked in, as in a chain, sure does not help with dispelling my impression. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | rogerrogerr 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Exactly - you can collect license plates numbers way easier than this. The best data they can really get is a connection to an IP address. | |
| ▲ | amazingman 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Checksum? | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sell it to the cops and/or ICE as belonging to "self-identified persons of interest." | | |
| |
| ▲ | blitzar 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Reminds me of the (legit) form to claim compensation for a privacy leak. Put in your name, address, phone number, dob, ssn and bank details - we will post you a cheque for $2.50 | | | |
| ▲ | boomboomsubban 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They list their sources, if you care but don't trust them you could replicate it on your own. | |
| ▲ | RobRivera 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Lmao I got honeypotted in h.s. by one of those 'does your crush like you' astrology sites | |
| ▲ | hopelite 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I totally understand your sentiment, but you could just check a random assortment of license plate numbers you collected while driving around, which also includes yours. At the very least that would effectively obfuscate your license plate sufficiently that it could not be attributed beyond other methods that likely already have done so. | |
| ▲ | MangoToupe 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Who isn't worried about being watched? I am certainly not confident the government can tell their ass from their face, so anyone could be suspect. | |
| ▲ | Simulacra 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sounds like social media ;-) | |
| ▲ | alilikestech 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Lol I actually tried it with my plate, i hope i don't get SWATed |
|
|
| ▲ | bix6 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Interesting I can’t access this over VPN |
| |
|
| ▲ | mfkp 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Seems like the website has ran out of cloudflare worker credits on their plan: Please check back later
Error 1027
This website has been temporarily rate limited
|
|
| ▲ | user3939382 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Can’t wait for the Flock Equifax/SouthParkWereSorry-esque breach announcement any day. I should start a betting pool w my friends. |
| |
| ▲ | khannn 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Hello, we at Flock are very sad to announce that your data was leaked, but due to the fact that we operate in a legal grey area to get around laws and are nothing more than the domestic surveillance equivalent to a PMC operating overseas, we invite you get fucked | |
| ▲ | Pikamander2 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No worries; after Flock gets breached, you'll be compensated with one free year of their services. | |
| ▲ | bigbuppo 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've got $10 on compromised six months before they had their first customer. | |
| ▲ | pilingual 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If YouTube personalities can break into the hardware, I wouldn't be surprised if foreign intelligence has already figured out a way. Clownin | | |
| ▲ | hopelite 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why would they break into individual hardware when they have unfettered access to the whole system in certain countries’ cases and can likely just hack into it in more adversarial cases? It is one of the several reasons why … yes, I know YC backed and funded Flock … the company and everyone in government that contracts for them to provide this mass surveillance service, is objectively and inherently treasonous. But don’t shoot the messenger just because people don’t like the message. “Whoopsie, my negligence I shouldn’t have been engaging in in the first place” is no exemption from being a traitor, betrayal. What that means for society and if and what it does about it is a different question. Based on historical trends, it all probably won’t matter since we’ve clearly crossed a threshold and the “PPP” tyranny (different from the trillion dollars in PPP loans that were forgiven and contributed to the inflation) is upon us because it wasn’t prevented when it still could have been. I don’t think people here are even tracking what is going on in TX, UT, LA (and soon to be nation wide); where as of Jan 1st all new accounts will have to provide government ID to install any app on a mobile device. |
| |
| ▲ | kotaKat an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | My breach compensation will be my choice of 3 Flock Cameras from any location in the US with a pole saw. |
|
|
| ▲ | dev_l1x_be 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have I been HNed? [Yes] No |
|
| ▲ | BlarfMcFlarf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean, we already had PRISM, why is anyone acting like this is a big deal? |
| |
| ▲ | basilgohar 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's a big deal even if it's been happening for a while. It should not be something we shrug our shoulders to and move on. These are stepping stones to a greater police state. |
|
|
| ▲ | kazinator 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have I been flocculated? Check your social security number to see whether you are considered pond scum. |
|
| ▲ | onetokeoverthe 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| just enter 10 license numbers. |