|
| ▲ | homebrewer 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| $14 is two days worth of living in my country for your average man on the street, among many other similar places. Imagine if you had to pay $200 to watch YouTube, that's how much these services cost for us. They refuse to correct for purchasing power parity and are left with nothing in the end. Steam seems to do very well in comparison. (I don't watch YouTube even for free, but practically everybody I know does without paying anything, and it makes a lot of sense). |
|
| ▲ | dottjt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When the alternative is the exact same thing you describe but for $0 dollars, then yes. |
|
| ▲ | graemep an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am not going to watch billions of Videos. Its not entirely ad free, just fewer ads, AFAIK sponsored segments remain so there are still ads, sometimes quite lengthy ones. $14/month is $168 an year, and if you subscribe to multiple other video services the annual total is going to be quite high. |
| |
|
| ▲ | podgietaru 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not to mention included YouTube Music. It's one of the few subs I pay for, because I watch a _lot_ of YouTube on the TV. And also like to have it in the background for "Podcast" style videos where the video is really only an accompaniment. |
|
| ▲ | londons_explore 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 14 dollars a month for a decade is $1680. To save $1680 I'd prefer to just use an adblocker (which I have done for the past decade) |
| |
| ▲ | hhh an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes, and you choose to risk losing the most important platform to humanity next to Wikipedia. Youtube should be a public service. | | |
| ▲ | graemep an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I am dubious about the importance of Youtube. If it disappeared tomorrow how long would it take for most videos to reappear elsewhere? Some of the creators I watch do have the videos available elsewhere. Veritasium is on Odysee, lots of people are on Nebula (and release videos there that are not on Youtube), etc. I think there is a good argument that having a single dominant platform has been harmful. | |
| ▲ | Rastonbury an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Insane hyperbole here, this guy's adblock = risking humanity losing it's 2nd most important platform owned by one of the most profitable companies in the world OpenAI thought of it first, should YouTube get a government backstop too? | |
| ▲ | latexr 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Let’s not get too hasty comparing YouTube to Wikipedia. Maybe what you watch on YouTube is interesting and educational, but let’s not forget it’s also a major platform for misinformation, propaganda, conspiracy theories, radicalisation, scams… | |
| ▲ | NaomiLehman an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | YouTube wouldn't exist as a public service. there would be no incentive to make videos |
|
|
|
| ▲ | spaqin 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's extremely subjective, but I'd rather save that $14 a month towards retirement. And if YouTube was only available with ads... well, that's no videos for me, maybe for the better, I would waste less time. |
| |
| ▲ | didntcheck an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure, and you're free to 1. Save $14 for retirement and not watch Youtube 2. Save $14 for retirement and watch Youtube with ads 3. Pay $14 a month for Youtube without ads The only option that's not fair is expecting private companies and creators to give you entertainment and its delivery with nothing in return | | |
| ▲ | malka1986 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Google is free to block me / my IP / ban my account. | |
| ▲ | consp an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Google uses your data and habits for profit. Dont pretend it's free. |
| |
| ▲ | GoblinSlayer 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I get cat videos through messengers. |
|
|
| ▲ | tcfhgj an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| $14 dollars better spent on liberapay |
|
| ▲ | krige 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >ad-free hasn't been in over a year |
| |
| ▲ | Wilya 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Youtube premium is still ad-free. There is a Youtube premium lite which is kinda-ad-free-but-not-really, but the full ad-free one still exists. | | |
| ▲ | tcfhgj an hour ago | parent [-] | | youtube premium has sponsorblock integrated now? | | |
| ▲ | fragmede 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | basically, yeah. there's a white fast forward button that appears during frequently fast forwarded sections, which unsurprisingly happens to be sponsor sections. |
|
| |
| ▲ | denkmoon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | ??? I've been on youtube premium / redtube since the beginning and I've been served 1 ad incorrectly in that time. | | |
| ▲ | rkomorn 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > YouTube premium / redtube I just googled redtube and uh... are you sure? | | |
| ▲ | codeflo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | YouTube Premium was originally called YouTube Red. Grandparent poster may have made a Freudian slip. :) | | |
| ▲ | rkomorn 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I know, I was just being... sassy. Partly because I didn't actually need to google it. |
| |
| ▲ | fragmede 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | YouTube Red was the previous name of YouTube Premium, probably renamed because of the unfortunate name clash you just noticed. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | malka1986 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I hate google, and I refuse to give them any money. |