| ▲ | spaqin 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||
That's extremely subjective, but I'd rather save that $14 a month towards retirement. And if YouTube was only available with ads... well, that's no videos for me, maybe for the better, I would waste less time. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | didntcheck 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Sure, and you're free to 1. Save $14 for retirement and not watch Youtube 2. Save $14 for retirement and watch Youtube with ads 3. Pay $14 a month for Youtube without ads The only option that's not fair is expecting private companies and creators to give you entertainment and its delivery with nothing in return | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | GoblinSlayer an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I get cat videos through messengers. | ||||||||||||||