| ▲ | phkahler 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>> Wayland compositors are still not as full-featured as X11 desktop environments It depends what features you care about. X11 doesn't have tear-free video playback, HDR, or as good a security model as Wayland. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | toast0 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
X11 has options for tear free video playback; it's not in the base protocol, and not all drivers offer it, etc, but it's acheivable. Fundamentally, you need to send the next frame to the server and ask it to switch frames during vblank (+/- notification), on today's systems, this is more of a coordination problem than a technical one; there's plenty of video ram to go around to double/tripple buffer. HDR would fit in the X11 model of many bit depths, however the specifics don't really; afaik, X11 has a maximum bitdepth of 32 for pixel values, which means either limiting to 2-bits of alpha channel or using palettes (I think I saw that indexed colors can be defined with 16-bits per channel). An extension might be possible (with everything that brings), but I think the ship has sailed. I agree that Wayland's security model prevents some undesirable interactions that X11 allows, but it also prevents or makes difficult some desirable interactions, so it's a mixed bag. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jitl 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I remember watching tear free HD video in 2011 on a netbook I dug out of the e-waste dumpster in the UC Berkeley CS building basement. Chrome/Openbox/X11. That laptop was literally trash. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mikkupikku 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using a compositor fixes screen tearing, no need to use Wayland for that. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||