Remix.run Logo
mempko 5 days ago

[flagged]

kulahan 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

What makes you think most of Americans walking around worried about a shooting? Are they still worried about terrorist attacks and bear maulings too?

I’m probably wrong, but dang this seems like such a silly thing to personally worry about.

mempko 5 days ago | parent [-]

Almost half of Americans apparently are worried about it. https://news.gallup.com/poll/266681/nearly-half-fear-victim-...

kulahan 5 days ago | parent [-]

I can’t help but think this is 99% due to the media. I would bet a million bucks, no matter who you are, that you personally will not get shot. That’s easy math.

But I also know human brains are bad at statistics. Meh.

pixl97 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I mean it does sound like you are bad at statistics.

You don't need to get shot to be a victim of gun violence. I've honked at a car that was driving aggressively and that driver pointed a gun at me. This is a common enough story in Texas to be meme-ifyed.

kulahan 5 days ago | parent [-]

I suppose that's one way to define it

selcuka 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

US is the 6th country in gun related deaths per capita [1]. I think human brains are very good at statistics.

[1] https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-death...

trimethylpurine 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Where is it in knife related deaths per capita? How does it compare in deaths per unit poverty per capita?

Good statistics beg good questions.

selcuka 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Your questions are irrelevant in the context. If you live in a country with lots of gun related deaths, you'd be concerned about getting shot. Having an equally high number of knife related deaths does not change this fact.

trimethylpurine 5 days ago | parent [-]

The argument doesn't seek to change facts, it seeks to invite a broader view of the facts at hand, and the issue, which is murder. Reduction in murder is the goal. Recognizing that murder is very closely related to poverty, not gun ownership, is relevant if you're honest and objective about that goal. If you discover that reducing gun ownership increases knife related deaths, that would be very relevant to the goal. It would then be irrelevant to talk about guns. Right?

Hypothetically speaking...

selcuka 4 days ago | parent [-]

> Hypothetically speaking...

Exactly...

> murder is very closely related to poverty

US is the only first world country, together with Russia, in the top 100 intentional homicide list [1]. The previous 3 countries are Burundi, Mayotte, Guadeloupe, and the next 3 countries are Greenland, Zambia, Liechtenstein (Greenland and Liechtenstein are probably round-off errors with less than 5 deaths per year). Are you really suggesting that those countries should be the benchmark for the US?

Now, according to the World Bank [2], the poverty rate in the US is 18%, which is very close to the UK (18.6%). The intentional homicide rates, though, are vastly different (5.763 vs 1.148). How does the poverty argument explain the 400% difference?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intention...

[2] https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/poverty-r...

trimethylpurine 4 days ago | parent [-]

> US is the only first world country, together with Russia, in the top 100 intentional homicide list

US is number one or two in immigration from 3rd world countries, and that's just by legal numbers, without considering illegal immigration, in which the US is also estimated to be number one.

This fits right in with the observable data you've shared.

You aren't actually claiming that the guns by themselves are making people murderous, right? That wouldn't be a scientifically sound hypothesis without some evidence to back. But I'll be interested to see if you can come up with something to tie those together.

Let's take Utah (since it's the topic of the thread) as an example to try to apply your argument. It has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world, and one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

How does your argument, or any other, explain that?

selcuka 4 days ago | parent [-]

> US is number one or two in immigration from 3rd world countries

This is good, because over the last 150 years, immigrants have been found to be significantly less likely to commit crimes than the U.S.-born [1] [2] [3].

> It has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world, and one of the lowest murder rates in the world.

I didn't deny that poverty is a factor. That's why I compared US with UK, where average poverty numbers are very close to each other. Also, Utah’s rate is low for the U.S. but still higher than many countries globally [4].

[1] https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2024/03/immigrants-are...

[2] https://www.nber.org/papers/w31440

[3] https://www.cato.org/blog/illegal-immigrants-have-low-homici...

[4] https://ibis.utah.gov/epht-view/indicator/important_facts/Ho...

trimethylpurine 2 days ago | parent [-]

I wrote "third world."

You've given irrelevant data. Hopefully by accident because I'd like to believe your arguments are made in good faith.

Find stats for third world immigrants to make your point.

I'll fast forward the conversation for you, country of origin is statistically very significant.

Just like you, I don't like that this is true. But fixing problems requires honesty and objectivity.

Hiding problems with bs stats isn't going to help anyone. That's how we got here.

selcuka 2 days ago | parent [-]

> You've given irrelevant data

In fact, calling it "irrelevant" is pushing the boundaries of good faith. It definitely includes "third world" immigrants, too. Apparently we haven't been able to find any statistical significance of the country of origin [1]:

> According to the study, this is the case for almost every region in the world that is a major source of immigrants to the United States. As of 2019, immigrants from China and eastern and southern Europe were committing the fewest number of crimes — as measured by incarceration rates — relative to U.S.-born individuals.

The exception is Mexican and Central American immigrants, but their incarceration rates are similar to, not _higher_ than U.S.-born individuals:

> The exception is Mexican and Central American immigrants, [...] Incarceration rates among Mexican and Central American immigrants were similar to those of U.S.-born individuals between 1980 and 2005.

> Hiding problems with bs stats isn't going to help anyone.

You've given no data at all. As it stands, everything you posted are your personal opinions.

[1] https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigra...

trimethylpurine a day ago | parent [-]

You've now given data that makes my argument. I don't need to provide citation where we're talking about your data.

What more do you need here? Immigration from third world countries increases crime and murder, having nothing to do with guns.

The previous data you gave tries to make the opposite point by including immigrants that aren't from third world countries, I.e. irrelevant. You for sure see how that's bad faith and I'm not going to entertain further discussion if you won't sustain that you're in the wrong for doing that.

You've also summarized the data with an interpretation that isn't honest to the numbers.

That last part absolutely ends the discussion for me. I'm interested in science not politics.

selcuka a day ago | parent [-]

You are clearly reading the data incorrectly. It says that immigration (third world or not) reduces the crime and murder rate. U.S.-born citizens are more prone to incarceration.

xwolfi 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I've been once threatened by an ex-gf with a knife, telling me she was gonna kill me. You know what I felt ? A mild worry, "come on, drop that, it's not worth it". She threw it across the kitchen and cried in my arms (difficult breakup, she has an history of family violence and alcohol abuse and comes from Myanmar, a tough place. We're both fine).

She would have had, to actually endanger me:

- to have enough strength to penetrate anything

- the courage to see a lot of blood and cries to actually go through with a full murder

- resist me fighting her back if it went to that, close range

- not react to any rational argument I would beg her to listen to while she attacked me

It was a bit traumatizing, but we laugh at it now... she failed at the first rational argument I presented "don't do it, don't ruin your life for a guy".

Imagine if we were in a gun country, and she pressed the trigger accidentally... it's not the same, you must understand that, knife murders are really really hard, gun murders really really easy.

trimethylpurine 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

https://www.humanium.org/en/the-horrifying-impact-of-knife-c...

Is this because they legalized knives? Obviously not.

It's because murder typically rises with poverty and wealth disparity.

kyleee 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Downplaying the dangers of knives, just tells us you don’t actually know much about knives…

kulahan 5 days ago | parent [-]

I've never heard anyone say knives are particularly dangerous outside of people trained in how to fight with them. They tend to be pretty damn short to begin with, unless you're sneaking a machete around in your pants (or are you just happy to see me?)

seanmcdirmid 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

There have been more than a few mass stabbings in China where lots of kids, from people who aren’t particularly trained in knifing people. There was the Wuxi vocational school stabbing in 2024 where 8 people were killed, there is a long list of school attacks, most of them are stabbings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_attacks_in_Chin...

There was also the Kunming train station mass stabbing a decade or so ago, killing 31 people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Kunming_attack

Note that China does have a pretty low homicide rate, probably since guns are so hard to get ahold of (death penalty for even producing guns in backyard workshops).

jbboehr 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I bought a knife a while back and, unfortunately, found out that it is really sharp. It could probably cut through flesh like butter.

kulahan 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, we have an insane number of gang shootings.

wallacewells 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

And 66th by murder rate. Scoping it to gun deaths is disingenuous, and exactly the kind of thing Charlie Kirk is being (rightly imo) accused of here. Please be better.

selcuka 4 days ago | parent [-]

Fair point, but not mentioning the socio-economic level of the top 100 countries in that list is also disingenuous. For a fairer comparison with similar countries; the per capita rate is 5.763 (!) for US, while it is 2.273 for Canada, 1.148 for UK, or 0.854 for Australia.

Even if it was as low as Canada, for example, 11,989 of the 19,796 people who died last year might still be living today.

If you think that those extra deaths are acceptable, and that guns have nothing to do with that, then I don't believe I can change your mind.

kulahan 4 days ago | parent [-]

I don't think anyone is arguing either of those things, but 12k excess deaths in a country of 330 million means this should logically be incredibly low on our priority list.

What else with a 0.00006% (20k/330M) chance of happening are we walking around worried about every day?

Edit: Note that the correct answer here is that these mass shooting deaths are primarily focused on school children, and has become their (first? second?) leading cause of death at certain age groups. IMO we solve this by raising the gun purchase age to 26, because this is mostly school-age children shooting younger school-age children, then we can ignore the problem pretty much indefinitely.

selcuka 4 days ago | parent [-]

> this should logically be incredibly low on our priority list.

0.00006% every year...

Why should there be a priority list? Why can't we improve multiple things simultaneously?

> we solve this by raising the gun purchase age to 26, because this is mostly school-age children shooting younger school-age children

This won't solve the problem. A Secret Service study of school attackers (2008–2017) [1] found that "Many of the attackers were able to access firearms from the home of their parents or another close relative."

[1] https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/Pr...

averageRoyalty 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Remember Charlie got shot while talking about gun violence. He himself said gun deaths are a worthy price to pay for freedom.

You didn't say anything incorrect here. To clarify though, the second part was not what he said when he was shot.

bena 5 days ago | parent [-]

No, he was insinuating that mass gun violence is a problem mostly among the black community.

mr90210 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

averageRoyalty 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

They have more than 1 per day on average:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_...

throwawaybob420 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]