Fair point, but not mentioning the socio-economic level of the top 100 countries in that list is also disingenuous. For a fairer comparison with similar countries; the per capita rate is 5.763 (!) for US, while it is 2.273 for Canada, 1.148 for UK, or 0.854 for Australia.

Even if it was as low as Canada, for example, 11,989 of the 19,796 people who died last year might still be living today.

If you think that those extra deaths are acceptable, and that guns have nothing to do with that, then I don't believe I can change your mind.

I don't think anyone is arguing either of those things, but 12k excess deaths in a country of 330 million means this should logically be incredibly low on our priority list.

What else with a 0.00006% (20k/330M) chance of happening are we walking around worried about every day?

Edit: Note that the correct answer here is that these mass shooting deaths are primarily focused on school children, and has become their (first? second?) leading cause of death at certain age groups. IMO we solve this by raising the gun purchase age to 26, because this is mostly school-age children shooting younger school-age children, then we can ignore the problem pretty much indefinitely.