| ▲ | electric_muse 4 days ago |
| Garmin’s hardware has always been exceptionally good, given epic battery life (~30 days even with all-day heart rate), exceptional sensors, and durability. Their software has traditionally been pretty rough. That’s coming from a customer and developer. Mainly that was because they had various software platforms for various families of device, so each feature needed to be built for each family of watch separately. They’ve unified that now to one main platform (picking the Forerunner’s platform), so it will be very interesting to see if they narrow the gap with Apple around software. The next big innovation will likely be sensors. This still uses the elevate 5 sensor that launched a few years ago. |
|
| ▲ | 8x 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| The software feels a bit clunky but I was very surprised when I plugged my Fenix watch to USB and found it mounted as a storage device with all of the data directly accessible as files. The watch would be perfectly usable without the cloud and using an alternative app like gadgetbridge. This should be the standard, but it isn't, and it is more important to me than a sleek UI |
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I have used their watches, but the bike computer and radar are the same, and it’s really helpful. You can plug in and access folders and files. Also: the Garmin Varia bike radar is absolute gold. I feel more unsafe without it than I do without a helmet. | | |
| ▲ | boringg 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I want to jump on this as the varia is easily the best safety feature for biking i have used beside helmets and arguably supercedes helmet since this warns you before a car shows up. Its steep price wise but if you are doing a lot of road cycljng on rural roads and fast traffic where one hit is the end its an easy to justify life insurance product. | | |
| ▲ | stevenhubertron 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Honest question - How is it helpful to know a car is coming? On my commute to work I have a bike lane and 100s of cars pass me in their lane, knowing a car wouldn't be helpful, knowing a car was going to hit me also may not be helpful if I couldn't move over, exactly what is the benefit? |
| |
| ▲ | codethief 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Also: the Garmin Varia bike radar is absolute gold. I feel more unsafe without it than I do without a helmet. Interesting, I didn't know such a thing existed. However, I'm struggling to understand the need. I ride my bike every day but I don't remember the last time I was surprised by a car approaching from behind. Where in the world do you live / where do you typically ride your bike? In what situations are you glad to have that radar? | | |
| ▲ | lonelyasacloud 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I have one of the Garmin varia radar lights and feel exactly the same about them. > Where in the world do you live / where do you typically ride your bike? In what situations are you glad to have that radar? UK; It's handy for knowing when on town or country roads without too much traffic; it can typically spot fast moving vehicles before you can hear or see them in mirrors (let alone if relying solely furtive glimpses over shoulder) Tbh, nice as it is to be notified about approaching vehicles, what I really like is that the light flashes at proportionately faster rates in response to the speed of the approaching vehicles. The changing rate does a better job of attracting the attention of drivers than constant illumination, and is also a psychological hack that makes the driver think they are being watched [0] and consequently behave slightly better when they do pass. Cumulatively the light/radar combination is a winner because it makes cycling more pleasant _and_ reduces the chances of getting hit by drivers. [0] In some of the newer units they are being watched as well, as they have camera's in them - apparently unit is a bit chunky and video quality in low-light is ropey. | | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > video quality in low-light is ropey. The video quality is ok.. ish. It’s not good in any lighting conditions but is plenty fine for getting licence plates etc. The main issue for me is how hard it is to get it off the unit wirelessly. It’s slow and frequently loses connection. Removing the card and doing it that way is better but the card is clearly not designed to be removed regularly and it would be very easy to break the slot that holds it. | |
| ▲ | throw0101d 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The changing rate does a better job of attracting the attention of drivers than constant illumination Variable-time/Random bicycle light flashing is a pet peeve of mine: I find it much easier to track the location and velocity of cyclists when the frequency of flashing is constant. |
| |
| ▲ | lairv 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I don't remember the last time I was surprised by a car approaching from behind. With a headwind I often don’t hear cars behind me at all, so I can see the use case | |
| ▲ | scottgg 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not op but I also have a varia and feel safer for it. Living in Switzerland, cycle a lot on public curvy roads in the alps. Often I don’t hear someone coming if I’m focusing on something else important - like traffic in the other direction - or I don’t realise there’s actually more than one car about to overtake which the Varia also shows. Generally turning your head around to check is a bit dodgy! | | |
| ▲ | ashirviskas 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Why not just use a side mirror? I use one and it is so convenient | | |
| ▲ | RankingMember 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The Varia can give you auditory alerts so you don't have to take your eyes off the road and look in your mirror. In addition, it can tell you how many cars are behind you with a range that would be hard to see in your mirror. | |
| ▲ | kgabis 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Varia can supplement bike mirrors with an early warning that a vehicle is approaching. Some people don't like bike mirrors (they look dorky), but personally I feel half-blind when cycling without a mirror. |
|
| |
| ▲ | petre 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I'm struggling to understand the need. I ride my bike every day but I don't remember the last time I was surprised by a car approaching from behind. Not get rear-ended by a car? There's also model with a camera to collect evidence. I have the one without the camera, just the radar and a light. > Where in the world do you live / where do you typically ride your bike? In what situations are you glad to have that radar? Central and Eastern Europe. Whenever I share the roads with cars. Although I'm more relaxed on outdoor paths or gravel roads where I don't have to keep an eye on cars all the time. For MTB you probably don't need it, but in road scenarios it's great. | |
| ▲ | Lio 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah you probably don't need it in slow moving urban traffic but I saw a video with some bike packers in Australia who used Varia. They were on rural roads shared with road trains. Road trains a very big, move very fast and they don't stop for anyone on a bike. So knowing they are coming up on you from a distance gives you time to get off the road. That's a very special usage case but I think any rural road with fast moving traffic would also benefit from the early warning even with just cars to contend with. | | |
| ▲ | dahcryn 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I just... dont understand why you dont hear them coming? Do people with varia use headphones or something? I don't have issues being aware about upcoming traffic, in either city traffic or rural environments. The only exception would be in heavy headwind situations | | |
| ▲ | Bishonen88 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Going 35-45kmh, most of what you hear is wind. Cars approaching 80kmh and beyond on a country rode. Garmin warns me 5+ seconds before the car passes me. I hear the car usually around 1s before it does (if that). Listening music (bone conducting) amplifies this. | | |
| ▲ | boringg 3 days ago | parent [-] | | You find the bone amplifying music works in wind? I figure it just adds more noise? Always tempted… its better than in ear for sure for safety. | | |
| ▲ | Bishonen88 3 days ago | parent [-] | | it works most of the times. Unless its super windy, it's enough to make a long ride more pleasurable with tunes for motivation/boost. I can't listen podcasts on them as I can't make out the individual words. It's better than the alternatives. For running they're much better! |
|
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What sort of cycling do you do? Coupd that make hearing cars easier somehow? The Caria is good in noisy situations or with multiple cars approaching. Unusually fast car approach get an extra alert. I have used it with headphones but usually don’t. You detect the cars far earlier than you do by hearing them. | |
| ▲ | 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Where in the world do you live I’m in New Zealand. I ride in the road in town and out in the hills at the weekend. The way I use it is to look down, see if a car is behind, then look behind before pulling out. I don’t bother looking back if there is a car close (the range must be around 100-150m I think?). It also yells louder if the car is approaching fast. The integrated light changes how it flashes when it sees a car. In group ride with talking etc, it’s helpful too as it usually doesn’t pick up bikes (unless the guy behind is an absolute unit) and the squawk of an approaching car is helpful for the group. Electric cars and busses no longer sneak up on me, it’s great use of tech on a bike. https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/698001/ | | |
| ▲ | arp242 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Ugh, I lived in Dunedin for a year, and it's the worst place I've cycled by a considerable margin. Much worse than e.g. Ireland or England, which also isn't exactly bicycle-friendly. The infrastructure isn't even half-bad, but the behaviour of motorists was just the worst. Kiwis are like that old Goofy cartoon where he's all nice and friendly until he gets in his car, after which he becomes a raging maniac. So yeah, with "New Zealand" as context a device like that makes more sense. |
| |
| ▲ | jwineinger 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | US. I ride shoulders on semi-rural highways. Sometimes there will be traffic in the opposing lane creating enough noise that I don't hear the vehicles coming from behind. With my Varia, I get warned well before they show up. It has even detected "hidden" vehicles that I couldn't visibly see -- like a small car trailing a truck. | |
| ▲ | rukuu001 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Buses! The front of the bus arrives much earlier than the engine up the back where most of the noise comes from | | |
| ▲ | roryirvine 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Especially since engine noise is increasingly a thing of the past - in my part of London, only one out of ~20-ish routes still uses hybrid buses. Almost all delivery vehicles and taxis round here are BEV too, along with a good chunk of private cars. Can be very hard to hear them above wind noise and general background hubbub, especially when wearing a helmet. |
| |
| ▲ | nsteel 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Are modified ebikes popular where you live yet? They can be very fast, very quiet and will do a lot of damage if you collide with one. | |
| ▲ | zymhan 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Anywhere that has cyclists sharing the road with cars. |
| |
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > the Garmin Varia bike radar is absolute gold. I feel more unsafe without it than I do without a helmet I never knew I needed the Varia but once I tried it I can't cycle without it; best bike safety device ever -- especially if you ride in places without much traffic | |
| ▲ | saagarjha 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Would you say it is better or worse than a mirror? | | |
| ▲ | boringg 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Better but circumstance dependent. Its for rural roads, and less busy roads. Not urban traffic |
| |
| ▲ | marbro 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You shouldn't feel safe riding a bicycle without a helmet because because accidents have not fallen since people began wearing helmets. Ski accidents haven't fallen, either, since they started wearing hemets. | | |
| ▲ | skeeter2020 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You have so many negatives in your statement I had to read it 3 times as a native English speaker to realize it doesn't make sense. We can make cycling safer in multiple dimensions simultaneously: 1. we learn from the Dutch about infrastructure and integrating cycling into the transportation fabric (slow and expensive), 2. the Dutch start wearing helmets (fast and cheap). | |
| ▲ | mvanbaak 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | There's so much the world can learn from the dutch when it comes to traffic | | |
| ▲ | bgnn 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | and the Dutch can learn to use helmets from the rest of the world instead of making fun of them (I'm Dutch). | | |
| ▲ | meiuqer 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This only began to become a problem with the introduction of e-bikes. Old people especially are not wearing them on e-bikes. On regular bikes where you are going 15km/h you should not have to wear a helmet. The infrastructure in the Netherlands protects cyclists enough (in general) and a fall at that speed is not really that dangerous (in general, again). Though an e-bike goes 25km/h. This is a lot more dangerous and people should definitely wear a helmet when driving one. | | |
| ▲ | saagarjha 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | What infrastructure can protect you from hitting the ground with your head when you're on a bike? | | |
| ▲ | meiuqer 2 days ago | parent [-] | | As i said, in general, going 15km/h is not fast enough to have a serious fall on your own. Only from external factors can riding a bike be dangerous, like from a car for example. in The Netherlands almost all cycle paths are isolated from cars as much as possible. So in general (again, in general) it is safe enough to drive around without a helmet. The data backs it up. Look at the deaths per capita in the Netherlands. You can see a steep rise with the introduction of e-bikes, but before that it was one of the lowest in the world. And that is saying something when it is the most cycling dense country of the world. | | |
| ▲ | saagarjha 2 days ago | parent [-] | | This doesn't address my concern? | | |
| ▲ | meiuqer 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Isolated cyclepaths is the answer. This will (mostly) prevent cyclists to be hit by cars and smashing their heads on curbs. | | |
| ▲ | saagarjha 2 days ago | parent [-] | | You do understand that people can fall off their bike without cars hitting them, right? | | |
| ▲ | meiuqer a day ago | parent [-] | | Yes, and as i mentioned, generally speaking that will not kill you if you wont go too fast. Like with an omafiets, you don't go that fast. I mean, we can go back and forth here all you want. You can look up the data yourself or visit the Netherlands and look around ... |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’m far from being the quickest cyclist out there and and my commutes are in the 30kmh range when it isn’t windy. There are plenty of e-bikes that pass me, and I’d estimate they are doing 40kmh. Not wearing a helmet would be mad. | | |
| ▲ | meiuqer 2 days ago | parent [-] | | those are speedpedelecs and i agree, you are insane if you don't wear a bike on that. e-bikes are usually 25km/h max in my countries (Benelux) |
| |
| ▲ | skeeter2020 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | who goes a max of 15 km/h on a bicycle? You'd get passed by a very fast runner. I easily go 25+ on my fully loaded bikepacking bike on typical commuting terrain. also, nit: you don't drive a bicycle | | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > also, nit: you don't drive a bicycle That bit is about e-bikes. I can get behind that phrasing. | |
| ▲ | meiuqer 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | On a typical dutch 'omafiets' you ride on average 15km/h. these are bikes that are used for every day trafic. bikepacking is a completely different way of cycling and has nothing to do with the way people in the netherlands use their bikes. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Belopolye 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | My wife enjoys telling the story from her time living in the Hague of watching drunk girls in mini skirts all attempting to ride side-by-side to keep each other upright, and...somehow managing to do it. |
| |
| ▲ | herbst 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | First and last and only time I saw actual brain on a street was in Rotterdam. I did wear a helmet in NL. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | guerrilla 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What, that's amazing. Sounds like my next watch will probably be a Garmin. | | |
| ▲ | alfiedotwtf 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I just wish their “most rugged watch” (the Instinct) was sapphire like the Fenix :( | | |
| ▲ | windexh8er 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I've had multiple Instincts as well as Fenix. I am exceptionally hard on watches. I don't take them off when I'm working on anything out in the shop. The sapphire of the Fenix is not a silver bullet and the case on the Instinct does a lot more to prevent direct hits to the face than you'd think, at least in my experience. The Instinct is also easier to polish than the sapphire. I've tried to buff out blemishes on Fenix watches I've gone to sell and have had a hard time getting them back to flawless. I've not had the same issue on any Instinct. That being said I'm really tempted by the new Fenix Pro. I have an inReach device I take with me for backcountry snowmobiling in the mountains and I've forgotten it a time or two. I never forget my watch and always have some extra battery with me. I just wish I could get basically the same specs as Fenix in a non-color and highly efficient display like Instinct. The 2 Solar is my daily watch and the battery life + built in flashlight make it my almost perfect watch. I don't even care about LTE but if I could get Instinct with inReach that would be a perfect setup IMO. Garmin does a lot of things right, but pricing is not one of them. Especially given they're moving towards subscriptions which is counterintuitive to their buyer market. I really don't want anything AI in my watch. | | |
| ▲ | alfiedotwtf 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Totally with you on everything you’ve said. I’ve had a few Instincts and Fenixes, and yeah - I think the Instinct 2 was my favourite watch of all time (currently using an Apple Watch Mega Super Ultra), but I loved the concept of the 7X… just a shame I couldn’t get used to that red tone on the solar. I found the same thing too - the instinct face gets protected while the Fenix is almost a brick and rock magnet :( So far, I think it’s only the black Tacticals that look like they would hide more surface scratches… but I’ve never had one yet. But, yeah - think if the Instinct 3 Solar came with Sapphire, I’d sleep better at night, so much so that it would probably be my forever watch! |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | jerlam 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The bones of their software are over 20 years old at this point, back to the Forerunner 101 which came out in 2003, predating modern smartphones. You had to plug them into a COM port to download your runs. I have Garmin watches from this time period that still work, but I can't figure out how to get any data from them. They're also issued in some military circles where they're not allowed to connect to a smartphone, and the lack of a microphone is a plus. | |
| ▲ | GranPC 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Did it mount as MTP or USB mass storage? | |
| ▲ | tonyhart7 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | "This should be the standard" well the reason its not common is because they cant charge you their subscription fee integration or something like that |
|
|
| ▲ | jtbaker 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The clunkiness of the software is a feature to me. I don't want my watch to have the slickest apps, I want it to be pretty utilitarian, rugged and functional. My Instinct Crossover is pretty perfect for that. The only thing that I think could be better (for me) would be a very rudimentary basemap view in addition to the existing breadcrumb trail functionality. |
| |
| ▲ | nradov 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not the clunkiness of the software that's the problem, it's the bugs. They frequently introduce regression defects in new releases. Like on my watch, suddenly structured track running workouts stopped tracking speed correctly and it took them like a year to fix it. I get the impression that they have a lack of test automation and too few human QA Engineers to manually test every feature on every release of every one of their many devices. https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2019/06/competitor-software-inst... | | |
| ▲ | ck2 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Garmin routinely stops all development for even the flagship model just a few years back, bugs be damned my Fenix6 still doesn't work correctly, no more updates People dropping $1000+ on a Garmin better understand that's just for a few years, not a decade | | |
| ▲ | hengheng 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | On my Fenix 6, Bluetooth volume control broke after a few years, and now the volume slider does nothing, which the hivemind confirmed. So, it is in fact worse than not getting upgrades, the software actually deteriorated over its lifecycle. | |
| ▲ | jtbaker 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | on the flip side, my 12 year old garmin fenix 3 still works great. I finally upgraded to an instinct crossover last year because I wanted the mechanical hands and a smaller face, but the old Fenix is still great. | | |
| ▲ | ck2 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I always thought it would be a really neat, very progressive idea if Garmin would "open source" firmware for models that are several generations back The fenix3 would be fascinating as an open-source test model |
|
| |
| ▲ | stevage 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah I'm still mad at garmin for a bug they introduced to my Oregon 550 GPS which caused data to be lost. They actually broke the track archiving feature so badly it looked like no one had even tested it. |
| |
| ▲ | wiether 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > The clunkiness of the software is a feature to me. Yes! But it seems they are getting more and more in the _smartwatch_ territory. It took me more time than I wanted to disable any kind of notifications on my new Enduro 3.
And a few weeks ago, with the latest update, I got the "morning thing" and "evening thing" enable automatically, so I had once again to get back in the settings to disable them. Previously with the Fenix I set a watch face, activities screen and I hadn't to change a thing for years.
It just worked as a watch and an activity recorder.
Exactly what I want from this kind of device. | |
| ▲ | isbvhodnvemrwvn 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The rough part is very poor UX and lots and lots of bugs. I have to give tutorials on how to use my edge when I lend it to people, it's so easy to do weird things by accident and is not obvious what's going on. |
|
|
| ▲ | intothemild 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The software has gotten a lot better since they made that change. That said, I'm a distance runner and within our cohort almost none of us want to buy Fenix's anymore. Especially without MIP displays. The Enduro series is now the traditional Fenix series. Also this Fenix 8 Pro is not getting reviewed well by the usual people (des, ray, etc) it's not a good watch for the price. The sacrifices made for both LTE and the new display are too great. |
| |
| ▲ | dchftcs 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | How much better is it now? I hate Garmin with a passion because their watches are effectively region-locked by language support, an insanely consumer-hostile move in this day. I was unable to use any features related to text or whatsapp messages because the watch shockingly could not decode messages in my native language. Their software was also so flaky that I was woken up by a faulty vibration alert in the middle of the night multiple times during the few months I wore the Garmin Instinct Solar, and at least twice I was unable to fall back to sleep. That is, the watch was supposed to be in silent or DND mode, but the watch probably crashed or reset in the middle of the night, losing the silent or DND state, allowing an alert to go through. The sleep tracking was also very inaccurate, and sleep tracking is the single most valuable metric for me. To this day I fantasize posting a video where I smash my Garmin watch to pieces alerting other people how bad it is. Still, the hardware was near perfect and it's hard to hate the watch itself. But because of the software issues, it was no better than a dumb watch to me. I hate Garmin the company. | | |
| ▲ | nradov 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Garmin devices have historically had two regions for languages: Asia and everywhere else. I suspect this is due to some legacy limitations in their proprietary OS around Unicode support. Years ago, it was very difficult to implement full support for all languages on a single device with very limited hardware and battery power. | | |
| ▲ | dchftcs 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Historically, in order to get support for one of the Asian languages, you typically had to buy the watch in the exact right country, not anywhere else. | |
| ▲ | nottorp 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | So how bad is it if you're "just" eastern european? I.e. latin alphabet but extra squigglies and ofc not an en_US locale. |
| |
| ▲ | ashirviskas 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Same sentiment here. I constantly get 90+ scores when I wake up feeling like shit. A 20€ chinese smart band combined with Sleep as Android provided much more accurate sleep tracking than a 800€ Garmin. The only 2 garmin specific features I use are (compared to what I had before): 1. LED flashlight, love always having a pretty good light on my wrist (I'm talking about the actual flashlight some Garmins have, not the "use display as a flashlight" feature)
2. GPS that does not drain phone battery
3. Looks Everything else for me is worse than a cheap chinese smart band. | | |
| ▲ | xarope 3 days ago | parent [-] | | are you talking about the titan pg or equivalent? I've seen reviews so far saying GPS and HRM are not that accurate? | | |
| ▲ | ashirviskas 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | > are you talking about the titan pg or equivalent? No, first time I'm hearing about it, I was talking about garmin vs Xiaomi Mi bands |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | mikestew 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That said, I'm a distance runner and within our cohort almost none of us want to buy Fenix's anymore. Depending on your definition of “cohort”, that’s simply not true. I see plenty of late-model Fenix in the wild. And, yeah, there’s a vocal minority of folks that prefer MIPS (often based on outdated or flat wrong assumptions, like “AMOLED isn’t visible in sunlight”, which is how you know the speaker has never used an AMOLED screen). As to the latest model, “not a good watch for the price” is a gimme when the thing costs two grand (U. S.). I’m at a loss as to what a watch might do to make it worth two grand to me. | | |
| ▲ | 827a 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The battery life difference is huge between OLED and MIPS. The Fenix 8 Solar gets 30-45 days of battery life. Fenix 8 OLED can get 28 days, if you turn off the always-on display; otherwise, 12 days. | | |
| ▲ | intothemild 3 days ago | parent [-] | | A good reminder here for people who don't do lots of activities on their watch and think that we just don't want to charge for a month. GPS uses battery. So having a watch that can last a month, for us means it will last a couple weeks of constant running/cycling/etc. This is in stark comparison to a smart watch. | | |
| ▲ | 827a 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yup. Many people will never experience this, but an Apple Watch Series 10 effectively cannot track a marathon for most runners. I've heard some people say that if you put it into its low-power mode, it can barely do it, but otherwise you need an AW Ultra, which can record up-to ~8 hours of continuous activity. If you regularly do longer, lower-impact outdoor activities like cross-country cycling or hiking, none of the Apple Watches can really handle it (especially if Apple's future intention is that you'll also be able to rely on it for emergency satellite connectivity; with what battery life??) When Garmin says that they have a watch that can last 28 days, what that really means is "it could do like 50-80 hours of continuous activity tracking" or "you can easily record a 10 hour hike, and also not be worried that the watch will be dead if you need it for emergency satellite services". That's years beyond anything Apple, Google, or Samsung can do; none of the big tech companies are remotely close to this. |
|
| |
| ▲ | oktoberpaard 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For me it’s not so much about the readability in sunlight, but about being able to glance at your watch without moving your wrist and about the watch not emitting light in dark environments. I find that distracting and I like the stealthiness of MIPS. That being said, if the minimum brightness is low enough and battery life with always-on high enough I think I could live with it, but with wrist gestures completely disabled except during activity. | |
| ▲ | LeifCarrotson 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Fenix 6 Pro MIPS guy here, you can pry that $600 watch from my cold, dead wrist! I tried AMOLED once - it lasted about 3 weeks and 200 miles before I sold it. AMOLED is visible in sunlight, yeah, but even with always-on it only brightens when you lift your wrist...which is always infuriatingly late, coming moments after I look at my wrist. And because they want to minimize that annoying latency, it's constantly blinking on and off with false positives demanding attention like a strobe light. Maybe I have poor form with trekking poles or an over-sensitive/miscalibrated IMU, but I remember one particular foggy dawn hike when was triggering with basically every step. The silent morning light and the mist off the lake should have been magical, instead they just reflected the blinky light on my wrist. I stare at glowing, colorful screens from 9-5 and struggle with distractions that similarly demands my eyeballs in the morning and evening. When I go into the woods it's because I want to leave those screens behind, not put an ever-larger, ever-more-vibrant one on my arm. (My wrist will probably be dead and very cold someday when the weather changes and I try to push my ultralight 40F bag to lower temps than it is capable of and couldn't send an SOS because my F6P doesn't have sat comms. You shouldn't have to wait long, it's September...jk, don't worry.) Probably going Coros or Suunto next, Garmin has lost the plot. | | | |
| ▲ | Ostrogoth 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As someone who uses (and prefers) MIPS screen to AMOLED, here are a few reasons I went that route:
A) User experience: I prefer watches to be tools that do a job, and otherwise to mostly get out of my way. MIPS serves that function well, and is similar to old school LCD displays in that regard. I find illuminated displays to be distracting and draw attention, especially after dark. In these days, where light up screens are pervasive, MIPS provides a more zen experience. It’s “always-on” when I need to view it, but otherwise gets out of my way.
B) Functionality: I use my watch to track daily workouts, and I’m about to go on a multi-day backpacking trek where a Garmin Fenix will be primary GPS device (phone/maps/compass secondary). Being able to view the screen and use maps without excess power drain is more useful for me. I prefer my watch to be a functional tool, and not just an extension of my smartphone. I don’t need a pretty light up screen. Battery life is not just about reducing charging frequency, but also reliability in the backcountry and on long workouts. Which leads to…
C) Longevity: longer battery life = less charging cycles = longer device life. I don’t feel like replacing an expensive device every year or two. MIPS screens are also more durable than AMOLED. I have friends that are using 5+ year old Fenix watches to track daily runs. | |
| ▲ | mvdtnz 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's MIP not MIPS and you are very misinformed on the reasons we prefer it. |
| |
| ▲ | mvdtnz 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The MIP display is disappearing from the Instinct range too, I hope they keep at least one very rugged MIP unit. | | | |
| ▲ | 827a 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | One of the frustrations I've had with a few of Garmin's recent releases is how their high-end MIPS watches, Enduro 3 & Fenix 8 Solar, seem to inherit the same thick, glare-y, ultra-durable glass I assume the Fenix 8 OLED uses, which does a number on the readability of their MIPS displays outdoors. I've never owned the F8 OLED, but I do have an Apple Watch Ultra 2, and the AWU2 is actually more readable than the E3/F8S in all light conditions except high-noon ultra-direct sunlight (which I'm very rarely outdoors in, because, you know, skin cancer). I ended up returning those, and got an Instinct 3 MIPS earlier this year, which is more readable outdoors across a variety of light conditions. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | thewebguyd 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > so it will be very interesting to see if they narrow the gap with Apple around software. they might be able to narrow the gap with Apple wrt software, but I don't think (at least in the US) Garmin will ever gain marketshare vs. the Apple Watch, especially now with the Ultra for the simple reason that Garmin just cannot offer an equivalent experience on iPhones because of Apple. We desperately need antitrust intervention to force Apple to open up iOS to allow other smartwatches to take advantage of the same APIs that the Apple Watch does. If that happens I think Apple will quickly find that they cannot compete on an even playing field. |
| |
| ▲ | mcintyre1994 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I thought this when I had an Apple Watch, but I’ve really not found much that I miss. I occasionally found it useful to action notifications, but dismiss is almost always all I want - and that works. Apple Maps doesn’t seem to care about being useful, but Google Maps does the right thing with notifications so I just use that instead. Music controls work, and they’re more reliable because it’s trying to be less magic. Siri is as useless on the watch as anywhere else. I think the watch worked as a camera control and I might have used that once. I do agree that Apple should be forced to compete on a fair playing field, but I don’t think they do a good job of taking advantage of it with Apple Watch. | |
| ▲ | MBCook 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I hate this argument. Android exists. It’s 50% of the phones out there. If Garmin’s products are so amazing why aren’t they killing it with Android users? From other people in these comments sounds like their own software quality is holding the back. If not being on the iPhone was truly the main problem, they’d be doing way better. | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Right, but that still means Garmin (and others) are effectively locked out of 50% of the market. Apple watch still remains the best selling watch of all times, not just smart watch, but of all watches. | | |
| ▲ | MBCook 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yep they are. And I’m not trying to say that should be ok. But if Garmin isn’t killing it today, opening the iPhone won’t let them kill it tomorrow. I see lots of Apple Watches. I see some Google/Samsung watches. I don’t think I’ve seen a Garmin watch. So I don’t think it’s fair to claim Apple’s policy is the only thing holding them back from being a dominant player. | | |
| ▲ | renmillar 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Better smartphone integration makes more business sense when you can target the entire market instead of just half of it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | izacus 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Garmin is killing it across the market, their revenue growing YoY despite commanding price premium that goes to 2-3x the price of apple watches. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | latchkey 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Their software has traditionally been pretty rough. I remember when one of their products was actually quite nice, until they lost the whole team... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1196996 |
| |
| ▲ | lotsofpulp 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Those comments are funny to read 15 years later. | |
| ▲ | zoklet-enjoyer 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Wow. Cookiecaper has some insane comments in that thread. Imagine changing your whole life just because your employer expects you to. No thanks. |
|
|
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Garmin’s hardware has always been exceptionally good, given epic battery life (~30 days even with all-day heart rate), exceptional sensors, and durability. The battery life thing is really compelling - however I need ECG and AF monitoring and Apple lead the pack here as far as I can tell. Fitbit seems to come close, but having multiple doctors state the need for an Apple Watch is quite the endorsement. |
| |
| ▲ | rafaelmn 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Check out Withings ScanWatch if you want ECG and a long battery life. The passive HR monitor, sleep tracking, SpO2, etc. are all shite compared to Apple but the ECG thing should be good enough I guess. My main selling point is that it lasts forever (20+ days), and even when the battery dies it still works like a watch for weeks. It looks like a proper watch, it has notifications so I need to look at my phone less, and it does the tracking OK enough that it's useful to check it out. They also have a BP monitor with ECG and a stethoscope that automatically recognizes some heart problems - so if you're worried about heart problems might be worth looking into. I would really like if they could get their HR sensor/activity tracking up there with Apple but it looks like no company out there is able to get into that league. | | |
| ▲ | nottorp 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > and even when the battery dies it still works like a watch for weeks Wha? The watch part is mechanical? Or you mean the smart part turns itself off way before you completely run out of battery, saving some power to keep moving the hands for "weeks" ? | | |
| ▲ | rafaelmn 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Power reserve mode, not mechanical. >When the battery level reaches 10%, you will receive a notification. At 10% you can no longer run a Respiratory Scan. When the battery reaches 0%, your watch activates power reserve mode. Only the analog clock, step, and sleep monitoring features remain available, and only for about a few days. In power reserve mode you will no longer be able to start an ECG or oxygen saturation measurement on demand via the watch display. It only happened once or twice, I was surprised that once you charge you still see the step tracking stats when it syncs. I remember using it in this mode for over a week when I was moving and couldn't be bothered to find the charger. |
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Thanks for this. |
| |
| ▲ | nradov 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The Garmin Fenix 8 device covered in this article has an ECG. https://share.google/IRWeaZMatrAD7Oyxr | | |
|
|
| ▲ | wslh 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Garmin’s hardware has always been exceptionally good, given epic battery life It is good to know the for measuring sleep, which is not a selling point of Garmin, it's far from being as accurate as Oura. But battery life is so incredible that makes you wonder how someone could wear other expensive smart watches (e.g. Apple/Samsung) for physical activities. > Their software has traditionally been pretty rough. That’s coming from a customer and developer. Mainly that was because they had various software platforms for various families of device, so each feature needed to be built for each family of watch separately. The software feels like a dumb terminal from the web, it doesn't work right without an Internet connection. |
| |
| ▲ | jjani 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | "As accurate as Oura" or "as is Oura"? The missing word is adding some ambiguity here :) | | | |
| ▲ | nradov 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Has Oura sleep tracking accuracy been independently validated against real medical devices? From what I've seen, all consumer wearable devices give inconsistent data and none are really what you could call accurate. | | |
| ▲ | wslh 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, there are several studies. One is this [1]. I have not tried the Oura 4 myself but once I test it I can compare with other devices. Clearly sample=1 but I found big errors with some watches. [1] "Accuracy Assessment of Oura Ring Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Comparison With Electrocardiography in Time and Frequency Domains: Comprehensive Analysis": https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8808342/ |
|
|
|
| ▲ | darkwater 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm in the market for a fitness smartwatch focused on running, I have a Garmin 500 something for my bike - it was a gift - and I totally hate its UI/UX. It's not touch, super slow to refresh, maps already don't get updates, the Garmin "generate a random track" sent me on gravel/rock terrain when I have a road bike, the app try to cross-sell you other shit etc.
Is at least the watches UI better? I was now thinking to purchase a Coros Pace 3. |
| |
| ▲ | pomian 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Try a Suunto.
Very different than Garmin.
(I found better battery, and menu.) |
|
|
| ▲ | giancarlostoro 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| MonkeyC was interesting, but at the time (2019?) we couldn't do a real-time type of app, that updated frequently with live data from a mobile app. It was a shame too. I think they have a lot of potential, and wish them luck. I personally just use the Apple Watch out of convenience of being in the Apple ecosystem. I do yearn for at least a week long battery life out of my smartwatch. |
|
| ▲ | jnsaff2 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The absolute worst experience I had with a Fenix watch (I think the 5x) was that when it could not read my HR from the wrist due to sweat or whatever, which happened often, it would log whatever the last reading was even though it could be wildly incorrect. This completely destroyed my trust in them. Having had experience in aviation I would really expect unreliable readings to be marked as such and rather not display anything than showing incorrect readings. |
|
| ▲ | ho_schi 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I hope the Edge series will also benefit from that code unification. I'm missing from Garmin usage of Inertial Navigation System (INS [1]). The sensors are in the devices, accelerometers and gyroscopes. We've using them in airliners for decades (very basic INS was available with the B707, high quality from the B747/A300 onwards), in cheap car navigation (that's why you can drive through tunnels) and most smartphones (you've probably noticed that also your phone handles five kilometer long tunnels well). As far as I know, high quality INS could bring a B747 over the atlantic.
My Edge has an accelermoeter and gyroscope but I see often straight lines in the mountains, in the city-center, in tunnels and garages and when the cloud coverage + trees work together. And it not just the recorded route, it is also the current speed and distance and precise turn-by-turn navigation. Garmin, Wahoo, Karoo keep adding more of GNSS. GPS, GALILEO, BAIDU, GLONASS, GLONAS 5GHz, Multiband and ground stations (that approach failed). That improved the signal remitance somewheat but the mentioned natural conditions still interrupt or reduce that GNSS quality. Because it is external! External navigation depends on external guidance. You cannot fix that by adding more. And hostile elements figured out, that is easy to jam or spoof[2] the GNSS signals. Using INS in combination with GNSS should work rather well on a roadbike. Usually mixing the signals from INS and GNSS depending on quality. Except where GNSS is turned off for reasons like jamming/spoofing e.g. in eastern europe. But usually INS needs only to cover a gap of 30 seconds to five minutes. INS is probably less useful on a mountainbike (vibrations and impacts) but especially in the woods GNSS fails...so maybe even here it can help. I think Garmin uses the sensors for other kind of metrics on mountainbikes already (I think the call it grit/flow?). My smartphone handles a tunnel well. My bike-computer also should do it :) [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_navigation_system
[2] At least GALILEO has some protection against spoofing? PS: The integrated LTE-Modem could also benefit security in cycling. There was a sad incident during the last roadbike world-championships in switzerland and a life lost. Cycling computers detect crashes and can send SMS with coordinates but they need a smartphone (radio isn't allowed and smartphones aren't robust). |
|
| ▲ | kmarc 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Third party app development must be a nightmare, based on how much of a nightmare it is even just to install and use those apps. But I must say, I wish other appliances would be as intuitive as the built in fitness tracking apps and they controls. Somehow it's just consistent, does the right thing, and works reliably. With only 5 buttons. |
| |
| ▲ | murderfs 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It truly is. You're forced to use Monkey-C, a homebrewed language that's probably the single worst language that anyone has to program in: https://developer.garmin.com/connect-iq/monkey-c/ | | |
| ▲ | kmarc 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Oh wow. Never encountered this (which is funny, wearing a garmin watch as a software developer for many years) Looks a bit like JavaScript with some extra c++ keywords :-) |
|
|
|
| ▲ | drewg123 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m a garmin user that moved from android to iPhone several years ago. I really miss the ability to filter notifications that hit the watch, which is still missing on garmin iOS software. I don’t think it’s a restricted api problem, as other smartwatches can filter notifications |
| |
| ▲ | mrheosuper 3 days ago | parent [-] | | In IOS, you can not get list of installed app, so you can not do notif filter purely from app. Notif is delivered by OS itself, through ANCS. |
|
|
| ▲ | mrheosuper 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Apple put an overpower, power hungry SOC in their smartwatch, so in term of software, i dont think Garmin can reach their level. But what Garmin can do, do really well. |
|
| ▲ | ksec 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Apple is now 10 years into Apple Watch, and it is just so far behind Garmin. |
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Heart monitoring is somewhere Garmin is trailing. | | |
| ▲ | nradov 4 days ago | parent [-] | | The latest Apple optical wrist heart rate sensor is marginally more accurate than Garmin in some situations. But as a practical matter it's kind of moot because anyone who really cares about accurate heart rate data uses an electrical chest strap anyway. | | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > anyone who really cares about accurate heart rate data uses an electrical chest strap anyway. I want to check, but not for exercise, for AF detection. Surely no one wears a chest strap full time. |
|
|
|