| ▲ | TheChaplain 6 hours ago |
| Getting a motorcycle license was a very good thing I've done for my life. Cruising on long roads, beautiful views, wild camping and meeting other people in a like-minded community. It really heals your mind and body. But obviously it comes with higher risk as you are more exposed and higher demands on your abilities.
And good gear can help, but if it is not combined with training and of course a sound attitude, you may sooner or later find yourself in an undesirable situation. Go to refresher courses. I do it every year to update myself and get an idea of my current limits. It really helps. To see what I meant about attitude, just go on Instagram and check for motorcycle reels, you'll see soo many examples of how to not act in traffic or what to do on a motorcycle. |
|
| ▲ | Workaccount2 an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Probably the single most important thing is learning good defensive driving. Which is different than "good driving". Lots of "good drivers" T-bone the guy who ran a red light. Defensive drivers see him barreling towards the intersection, as they check both ways despite it being green. On a motorcycle, even if a crash is not your fault, you're still dead. |
|
| ▲ | xnyan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > but if it is not combined with training and of course a sound attitude, you may sooner or later find yourself in an undesirable situation. I ride motorcycles, so this is not a argument against it, but even with all the best safety gear and perfect habits you’re still significantly more likely to die in an accident compared to a motorcycle per mile driven. |
| |
| ▲ | bityard an hour ago | parent [-] | | Motorcycle fatality and injury statistics don't control for a rider's skills, experience, or attitude. Add to that the fact that motorcycles tend to attract a large number of young thrill seekers on crotch rockets and counter-culture types on choppers--neither of which put much, if any, level of effort into safety--and you get studies and statistics saying that motorcycles are basically two-wheeled insta-death machines. Yes, a motorcycle rider will never be as protected as a person in a car surrounded by a steel frame and airbags. That should go without saying. But it would be nice if we can acknowledge that people who actually make an effort to wear their gear and maintain situational awareness generally aren't well represented in the statistics. | | |
| ▲ | Workaccount2 an hour ago | parent [-] | | It's been probably over a decade since I dug into this, but IIRC, if you have a motorcycle license, insurance, a registered bike, and wear a helmet, your fatal accident chances drop by 70%. | | |
| ▲ | philwelch an hour ago | parent [-] | | That’s equivalent to saying that if you don’t have a motorcycle license, don’t register your bike, don’t have insurance, and don’t wear your helmet, your fatal accident risk increases by over 3x. Put that way, it’s not surprising, nor does it actually tell you anything about the base rate safety of lawful motorcycling. By way of analogy, you could just as easily say “not dousing yourself in gasoline reduces the risk of death by smoking by 98%”, which is both true and useless. | | |
| ▲ | Workaccount2 11 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I totally get what you are saying, but if you ride motorcycles and have been around motorcycle groups, the stat is clearly saying "as expected, it's the dumb kids doing the dieing". The comment is written for other riders, I left out a lot of detail for it to be a general comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | xandrius 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I love the idea but our roads almost worldwide are cursed with ever-present cars which do not cars about anything else. I've heard lots of and lots of near-misses, accidents and bullshit interactions between bikes/motorbikes and cars. I just finished reading a travelogue about the dude who cycled around the world in 1800s. Sure, one could do it today but the roads he was riding on were almost empty, now you would have to be cautious every time, since 1 asshole and you're out. |
| |
| ▲ | diggan 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > our roads almost worldwide are cursed with ever-present cars which do not cars about anything else Kind of feel like you're over-generalizing here. Where I live, there is almost more motorbikes than cars a lot of the time, which considering the rush hour traffic, kind of makes sense as most people don't wanna get stuck in those queues. Of course, there are accidents and near-misses (almost by definition, since those on motorbikes tend to go between car lanes), but it's not like there is a 99% chance of you dying every time you use a motorbike. I think it depends a lot on how used to motorbikes the car drivers are. Since I live in a place where there is a bunch of them always (and cyclists!), I feel like most of us pay attention to where they could show up. Compare that to countries where motorbiking isn't as popular, I could understand how it's more risky to go with the motorbike as the car-ists aren't as used to them appearing wherever. | | |
| ▲ | plemer 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | My doctor buddy told of a room in the hospital called the Cabbage Patch, full of braindead people who absolutely will die but can’t be let to die yet. Who is that room full of? Consider that the fatality rate is roughly 30 times higher per mile for motorcycles vs cars. I fully understand the freedom of the open road riding on a metal stallion - I’ve genuinely never felt anything else like it. But it’s really god damn dangerous. Let’s not kid ourselves. | | |
| ▲ | hilbert42 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I love motorcycles and it's years since I've been on one. Despite their convience and other virtues I won't own one as I reckon I'm not competent enough to drive one safety—despite having an excellent safety record with four-wheeled vehicles. Agreed, they're 'god damn dangerous' but where does that '30 times' figure come from? Where I am the generally accepted figure is seven times (or it was when I heard the figure a while ago). Edit: for years I've thought that if motorcycles were a new invention they'd never be licensed these days. That they still are is historical legacy upheld by riders and the industry that makes the machines. | | |
| ▲ | buran77 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I'm not competent enough to drive one safety Underestimating your abilities in any vehicle is a good way to stay safe. In my encounters with motorcycles in traffic, as pedestrian, cyclist, or driver, even in those short few seconds while our paths cross, the motorcyclists almost always put themselves in some dangerous situation (cyclists do it even more often I'd say, but at lower speeds). Every time I talk about this to acquaintances who ride they explain that "I do this all the time but it's fine because I know what I'm doing". Everyone is an above average driver or rider but drivers have a metal box filled with airbags. Motorcycle riders often play Russian roulette with 5 bullets in. Blaming another for when your luck finally runs out in on par with the belief most hold that they are above average. | | |
| ▲ | hilbert42 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | "(cyclists do it even more often I'd say, but at lower speeds)." The behavior of cyclists where I am is a particular problem. Unlike motorcyclists, they're unlicensed and don't even have to know the rules of the road, and it shows. Trouble is, during an incident between a cyclist and a car driver the sympathy vote is in the cyclist's favor. Especially so in recent times where cycling is seen as 'green' and environmentally friendly and with many cities making car drivers feel as if they're guilty pariahs. To give you some idea how bad this problem has become where I live (Sydney, Australia) is to consider the street where I live. It's a one-way street (as it's narrow) but recently the Council has made it two-way for cyclists and painted bicycles on the street to indicate thus—for motorists it's still one-way. The lunacy of this decision is obvious even to those with a room-temperature IQ. For starters, drivers (usually visitors) often mistakenly drive the wrong way down this street and it's been the situation for years (from street arrangements and local geography it seems the logical way to go, and the sineage is poor and hard to see). It gets worse, there's a sharp bend in the road so two vehicle approaching from either side cannot see each other and there's nowhere to pull off in an emergency! Lunacy has no limits, now consider the same head-on situation between a cyclist and a vehicle, it's a miracle no one has been killed to date (but the change is recent—there's much time to go). Right, the trendy and electorally savvy, many-term Council has the ear of cyclists and no doubt this dangerous change was the result of cyclists' lobbying. Not if but when someone is killed then who's to blame? Even if a motorist is found not to be at fault (i.e. driving in the right direction) and is completely exonerated then he/she will have to live with the knowledge that he/she was the driver of a vehicle that killed a cyclist. What amazes me is that cyclists want this dangerous situation to continue to exist, it seems that sheer convenience takes precedence over their safety in both their minds and that of the Council. More to the point, cyclists seem to have overwhelming confidence in their ability to avoid an accident. Even more amazing is that this situation can exist in this overly safety conscious, horribly risk averse society. From my perspective it's high time this nonsense stopped. The first thing would be license cyclists—if nothing else, they'd at least know the road rules. |
|
| |
| ▲ | diggan 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Consider that the fatality rate is roughly 30 times higher per mile for motorcycles vs cars. I guess it's worth asking, what country? In Spain, I think it's closer to ~10x, probably because we're very used to motorcycles driving all around us all the time. But still, riskier, no doubt. I'm guessing that numbers come from the US in some way or similar? Watching dashcam footage sometimes, I keep seeing people riding motorbikes in the US without helmets, something I almost never seen in Spanish traffic, I can only recall seeing that once in my life, and it's really uncommon to ride a bike without a helmet here. > But it’s really god damn dangerous. Let’s not kid ourselves. Agree, I'm not trying to convince anyone of otherwise. But lets have nuance as well, riding a motorcycle isn't the same everywhere, especially where motorcycles are really, really commonplace in daily traffic. | | |
| ▲ | theshackleford 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I guess it's worth asking, what country? In Spain, I think it's closer to ~10x From what I've been able to gather, it looks to be closer to 20-23x on a per kilometer basis. |
| |
| ▲ | literalAardvark 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you factor in rider error and rider behaviour the rates are much closer. It's just that most riders can't ride worth a damn, 95% of the riding information on the internet is dangerously wrong, and most of us also often ride recklessly because we're on a motorcycle to have fun in the first place. | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | And how old are those motorcycle riders who suffer serious accidents? There's your answer. |
|
| |
| ▲ | potato3732842 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There was literally 1/5th as many people on earth in 1900 as there were today. Of course the roads were empty. Even if you compare to 75yr ago there's been a doubling of population in many countries. | | |
| ▲ | giantg2 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | "There was literally 1/5th as many people on earth in 1900 as there were today. Of course the roads were empty." We're there 1/5 the number of roads back then? Number of people might not be the best measure of density. Number of people in a specific walkable/short horse rideable location, such as a city would. I think the bigger thing is that trains were the main mode of distance travel on land and very few people traveled more than 50 miles from home in their life. | | |
| ▲ | potato3732842 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | >We're there 1/5 the number of roads back then? Probably more like 1/2 or 3/4 depending on how you want to count dead end office park and residential subdivision roads of which there are many. Pretty much every road in the US and Europe that isn't in the above category or a purpose built highway existed in 1900, and likely 1850 if you're looking at europe or the american northeast. Obviously size and quality was lesser, many times they weren't even paved. But they existed because they were the roads between towns and points of interest. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | lifis 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think that motorcycle and e-bike safety can be greatly enhanced by never doing things a car couldn't do. Always stay in the middle of the lane (unless you need to avoid a pothole), never overtake unless a car would have space to overtake, never enter an intersection alongside a car in the same lane. On a bike, you also have the option of behaving like a pedestrian (cycle on the sidewalk slowly) occasionally. If you don't do this, it's only a matter of time before a car hits you because it didn't expect a vehicle or pedestrian doing what you are doing. |
| |
| ▲ | giantg2 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "Always stay in the middle of the lane" Usually the middle is more slick from oil drips and contains more debris. That's why most people ride in one of the tire tracks from the cars. | | |
| ▲ | Zambyte 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's also the best place to be to maximize damage if you happen to rear ended. It's also illegal where I live (edit: for specifically e-bikes). |
| |
| ▲ | mynameisash 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was coming home from work on my bike very late a few years ago, and I was on the side of the lane where your car tire would be -- not in the center. It was a good thing, too, because there was a full size ladder in the road, lined up exactly in the direction of traffic. Cars could safely drive 'over' it. I missed it by maybe a foot. If I were in middle of the lane, I would have taken a serious spill. | | |
| ▲ | bpc777 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I have also barely avoided a large ladder in the middle of the lane. Don't follow closely so you have more time to see what is ahead and react. |
| |
| ▲ | bpc777 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Always stay in the middle of the lane This is wrong. Use the whole lane to be in the best spot to see and be seen. Use lateral movement to increase your visibility in driver mirrors. | |
| ▲ | travoc 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The middle of the lane is where cars drip years of oil and coolant. |
|
|
| ▲ | hilbert42 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "Go to refresher courses. I do it every year to update myself and get an idea of my current limits. It really helps." I'll preface this by saying I love motorcycles but haven't been on one for decades. As a driver of four-wheeled vehicles, the biggest problem I have with motorcycles is seeing them. Fortunately, I've never had an accident with a motorcycle but have had some near misses. All of those were because (a) I did not see the rider and (b) they were in positions where I did not expect them to be—on my wrong side, quickly switching lanes seemingly appearing out of nowhere, etc. Whilst hardly in that league, I experienced an incident only three days ago that illustrates the point. At a shopping centre on a busy road I found a parking spot tight enough to require multiple maneuvers to park. When about to leave a motorcyclist pulled in behind me without me being aware of it (I was arranging shopping stuff so it wouldn't go everywhere when vehicle was in motion and there was no noise to indicate his presence). He wasn't there when I got in the vehicle and I couldn't see his motorcycle both from my rear vision and side mirrors. I reversed slowly and felt a resistance and stopped immediately (I touched so gently there was no noise—and not even a scratch to show). (He wasn't on the motorcycle or I definitely would have seen him.) What this motorcyclist did was to sneak into an illegal parking space so small that he effectively blocked my exit, I could not leave before he did. Sure, I wasn't really inconvenienced as he was delivering something to one of the businesses so he wasn't long. Motorcycles offer conviences other vehicles do not, here being able to park in a small space. Motorcyclists get used to such conviences without realizing that other motorists might not be aware of them. For example, motorcycles allow for easy maneuverability which tempts riders to make illegal maneuvers that car drivers wouldn't even consider doing in the same circumstance. If the last thing on a car driver's mind is an unexpected maneuver by a motorcycle then it doesn't bode well for its rider. From my experience, many motorcyclists drive from their perspective and not that of four-wheeled driver's. It's why I don't own a motorcycle, if I did then before long I'd be in motorcyclist thinking mode, and that'd be damned dangerous for my health. |
|
| ▲ | ubermonkey 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I learned to ride in my 50s, and I am 100% convinced it made me a better driver. |
|
| ▲ | lylejantzi3rd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you're really worried about it you could buy an airbag. FortNine on motorcycle airbags: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2jZryt607U |
| |
| ▲ | ubermonkey 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'll chime in here and note that, until very recently, there wasn't an airbag system that really appealed enough to ME. The affordable ones, now long in the tooth, required a tether. The nicer ones were built into vests that weighted more, were hotter, and sometimes required a subscription, meaning a billing error could result in a nonfunctional safety device. Um, no. AlpineStars released one that was ALMOST right a year or two ago called the Techair 5. It was (is) accelerometer driven, so no tether, and while it has an app it doesn't require a subscription. However, it IS heavy, and it IS hot, and it DOES require that you mail it in to be serviced after a deployment, so that was still a no-go for me. However, last year AStars released the updated TechAir 5 Plasma, which has all the goodness of the original TechAir 5 while also being materially lighter and cooler -- plus, the canister can be replaced by the end user. It's spendy ($800 or so), but I bought one immediately. I wear it more or less every time I get on the bike. I live in the American South, so when I say I'm not any hotter wearing it than I would be without it, you know it's vented well. (In fact, I wore it on a 4-day road trip between where I used to live (Houston) and where I live now (Durham) 2 weeks ago. Was it a hot trip? Absolutely; I was riding a motorcycle in TX, LA, MS, TN, and NC in the summer. Did the airbag make me less comfortable? No.) |
|
|
| ▲ | TacticalCoder 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've done MX (Yamaha YZ 250 two strokes: a monster), enduro (big mono-cylinder) and road driving on a variety of motorbikes. Road driving is by very far the most dangerous of them all. I just quit about 15 years ago. Now I'm a petrolhead at heart so I still enjoy scenic roads but with a car. It's much safer. |
| |
| ▲ | JKCalhoun 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I tell people worried about motorcycles (I've had motorcycles around more or less since I was 12) — if safety is the most important thing for you, skip motorcycles (and bicycling, etc.). I'm surprised how often people project their own fears on me with comments like, "Aren't you afraid you'll get killed?" As though that never occurred to me, ha ha. Obviously I choose to do some things in life that are not the safest — but I do them because they make life more worth living. (Sound like a bumper sticker? Hopefully you get the point though.) Likely there are things others do that add a degree of risk to their life but they feel are worth it. | |
| ▲ | theshackleford 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Now I'm a petrolhead at heart so I still enjoy scenic roads but with a car. It's much safer. I've tried it in a car, but it's not the same. For me, it's not even 1/10th of the experience of being on a bike. It's like all the soul has been sucked out of it. I might as well be in a minivan on the freeway for all the joy it gives me. I'm not riding at the moment due to an unrelated (incomplete) spinal cord injury and some long term issues relating to that, and so i've been trying it in a car, and I even bought a "fun" car thinking it would help. But it just feels so...meh that i've largely just given it up full stop and am going to just sell the car. I'd been riding since I was five years old, I dont think anything will ever touch it for me honestly. It was my zen place, the place I was truely happiest and at peace. It's been the biggest loss for me since my injury. There is still a chance I could one day return to riding, so i've kept the bike (a 2012 BMW F800GS) out of sheer hope, but I must admit that it's likely by the time I can physically, I may no longer be mentally capable of the return. |
|
|
| ▲ | oulipo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Perhaps for your selfish self. On the behalf of all hikers and cyclists, and even people living in the city who have to bear with your awful noise, f*ck all motorcyclists |
| |
| ▲ | potato3732842 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You're probably on the wrong side of history. As society gets wealthier fancy toys like motorcycles proliferate and more people have a stake in being able to use them. I think the way the flood of Side by Sides onto the market gave enough of the public an interest in off road motoring to overwhelm the "hikers only" advocates decades old tactic of variously allying with different groups to get the others kicked out is highly illustrative here. When motorcycles are commonly electric and require basically no maintenance and can simply be turned on in the spring year after year the barrier to entry is gonna drop even further and you're really gonna be up shit creek. | | |
| ▲ | loloquwowndueo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | “Fancy toys like motorcycles” - looks like you’ve never been to less developed countries where motorcycles swarm not because they are fancy but because they are cheap. Also tend to be driven by people with no training or concept of safety (whole families on a tiny scooter). Truly a sight to behold. |
| |
| ▲ | theshackleford 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What are you talking about? My bike is quieter than most cars. How about not generalising? |
|