Remix.run Logo
SilverElfin 3 days ago

Gas cooking is still much better. I have both. Induction just isn’t as enjoyable and you can’t do things like move your pan and have it keep heating like with a flame. Not to mention, induction is rough on pans. Banning things is aggressive and uncalled for.

stephencanon 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

It’s really not. We built an all-electric ADU for my parents, then ended up living in it while renovating our house. As someone who cooks pretty much all meals, the induction range is better in almost every way than the fancy gas range that came with our house, so we’re replacing it with an induction cooktop in the renovation.

bn-l 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

100% agree. Apart from breathing in the gas (which isn’t good) and combustion products (ditto), setting the heat is very imprecise with gas. How hot? Ah… a “medium heat”. What is that? Or “when the flames are smallish”. With induction you write your recipes with a solid number and get consistent results.

SilverElfin 3 days ago | parent [-]

I disagree with this. The “numbers” that are on induction stoves are not at all consistent. They aren’t even consistent within the same range between different burners.

waste_monk 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Are they intended to be? Assuming the burners are different sizes - I would not expect the same setting to equal the same wattage on different size burners, as intuition would dictate that a large burner would be more powerful for tasks like wok cooking. What does the operator manual say?

It really depends on the quality of the appliance; something like the Breville Control Freak can give you induction cooking with temperature control down to the degree, whereas my cheap countertop Tefal induction hob just gives a few settings with broad power ranges and you have to figure out what works best for you.

bn-l 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Ok so “burner 1, power 6, 10 minutes”

BoorishBears 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I bought my parents an induction range too and had the same revelation visiting them: I actually cooked more, despite the higher friction of having to cook in an unfamiliar kitchen, because it was so much faster to get things going.

Even for something as simple as pasta, having boiling water in 2 minutes instead of 7 or 8 minutes is huge. I can wait for the former, but with the latter I usually end up doing something else for a bit, and then suddenly 7 or 8 rounds up to 10 or 15 minutes.

fcpk 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I use both for complex cooking. I find myself using induction 90% of the time. It heats faster, it heats more consistently and it's much easier to clean. The only time I find gas useful is when doing things that require a lot of moving the pan work(sauteeing food in the air, flambée, and similar). Induction hobs with a temperature sensor are absolutely amazing to use for exact temperature cook. Also it is a lot safer with toddlers and children around.

I haven't found it to be rough on pans, but I only use thick stainless steel pans with aluminium/copper core.

PS: yes, gas is enjoyable as it gives you this primal heat feeling:)

SilverElfin 3 days ago | parent [-]

Which pan do you use? I’ve used heavier steel pans and they too eventually warp (like within a year’s use).

ViewTrick1002 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Do you let your pans heat up before use? Do you let your pans slowly cool down instead of dunking them in cold water?

I haven’t had a pan warp on me for years just being mindful of letting it heat and cool at a reasonable paces rather than blasting them with the ”power” mode. And this is in Europe with our 400v kitchen outlets.

Doxin 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not who you're replying to, but I use cast iron and steel on my induction stove and I've not had any warping over a period of 4 years now. One thing might be using the stove on the maximum setting? max power on an induction stove is going to be heating your pan MUCH quicker than on gas. Personally I only use settings over 8 (out of 10) for pots with water in them, not for skillets etc.

fcpk 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm in europe but if any relevant: I use mauviel and cristel pans.

jemmyw 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not much better. It's slightly better at specific things and worse at most things. I've had plenty of gas hobs. I think I'd prefer normal electric over them just for being easier to clean and not having to deal or worry about gas. You learn to deal with the shortcomings of electric. Induction is great though. When we remodeled our kitchen we went from electric, gas for 3 months, induction. Life has improved.

The only thing I don't like about induction are those cooktops where they put the controls as touch buttons on the surface. I'm glad we rented a place in the past with that to learn how stupid it is so as to get one with proper knobs that don't you can't accidentally get hot.

worthless-trash 3 days ago | parent [-]

You're not providing any information.

> easier to clean

I haven't found this to be the case, they both require effort to clean.

> not having to deal or worry about gas

Maybe its local specific, what do you worry about ? Whats the hassle in dealing ? The biggest worry I have with gas is remembering to pay the bill.

Nullabillity 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> I haven't found this to be the case, they both require effort to clean.

Electrics are (generally) a smooth flat surface. Of course you're not getting out of it entirely, but it's still a question of night and day compared to the mess of a gas stove.

shawn_w 2 days ago | parent [-]

Electric stoves generally use raised exposed heating coils (that are rarely able to stay level, making oil and other liquids run to one side of the pan, making frying etc. stuff a headache). I've lived in one place over 40+ years that had a flat top electric stove, and it suffered from being even slower to heat up than regular electric.

I'd kill to have a gas stove and be able to do serious stovetop cooking.

Nullabillity 2 days ago | parent [-]

Any modern (made within the last ~20 years) electric stove is going to just have a flat top with markings, just like an induction stove.[0] Before that you'd have a flat surface with a cast iron disk protruding for each hot surface.[1] Less trivial than the flat surface, but still not too bad. I've seen.. maybe.. one with an exposed coil in my entire life, and that thing was ancient. Faaaaar from "generally use".

[0]: https://www.electrolux.se/services/eml/asset/782bdf32-f709-4...

[1]: https://www.electrolux.se/services/eml/asset/fe80a43d-0b1c-4...

shawn_w 2 days ago | parent [-]

Your experience with stoves has been vastly different than mine.

>flat surface with a cast iron disk protruding for each hot surface.

Never seen a design like that.

Given those URLs maybe it's a country thing? Are you in the USA?

Nullabillity 2 days ago | parent [-]

> Are you in the USA?

Sweden.

shawn_w a day ago | parent [-]

That's what I figured. Yeah, no wonder your experience is different.

jemmyw 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The smell, worry about it being left on. I've got kids, they like to cook, I'm sure they'd be capable of dealing with a gas cooktop (we've got a bunsen burner for science stuff) but it's just nice not having that.

We don't get gas pipeline connections here, we get bottles that a company comes and replaces.

Compared to gas, I find induction just as responsive, more powerful on the highest setting. A nice feature is the auto heat which gives it more power until the pan is at the target level then reduces. I also think (but not sure) that the lowest level is far cooler than the lowest gas setting was, making it easier to use for baking - melting butter, chocolate, things that require gentle warming.

So, as I say, other than the specific flames around a wok, it's better overall. I do have an induction wok, it's not as good. It's fine though, I wouldn't trade or bother with a separate gas cooktop just for that.

johnisgood 2 days ago | parent [-]

Regarding kids + induction vs gas. I think it is much easier for kids to harm themselves in case of induction. They surely have learned that fire burns, thus they are conditioned to avoid touching fire, whereas induction is different. My two cents.

Doxin 2 days ago | parent [-]

With induction it's basically impossible to burn your house down, which is very doable with gas, so there's that.

johnisgood 2 days ago | parent [-]

I suppose it is all about trade offs, like with everything else in life. :)

Doxin a day ago | parent [-]

for what it's worth I switched from gas to induction, and to me it's a clear upgrade in almost all aspects. Induction is worse at spreading the heat, but other than that it's just... better.

ponector 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

>>I haven't found this to be the case, they both require effort to clean.

Unless you start cooking with dirty induction cooktop, they are much easier to clean simply because the temperature is much lower, the surface is flat and easy to clean

seanmcdirmid 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China has a bunch of induction hobs that are wok shaped designed for high heat precise heat control wok cooking. I think they want to replace propane eventually as the primary stir fry cooking energy, which matches their moves to replace ICEs with EVs.

AIPedant 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I would say that using a high-pollution method of cooking when cleaner options are easily available, simply because it's more enjoyable, is aggressive and uncalled for.

"Yes, this is bad for kids with asthma who have the misfortune of living in my neighborhood, but it's great for quesadillas! So you have to look at both sides."

SilverElfin 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

The pollution from gas stoves is far less from the pollution all cooking generates (from the food itself). It’s really not material at all. And if you have a hood fan there’s really no difference.

nullc 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Cooking itself produces considerable pollution. If you have adequate ventilation for that the additional contribution from gas is absolutely insignificant.

AIPedant 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

That is not true:

https://archive.is/A23eV

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6355613

Simply running a gas burner generates about twice as much PM2.5 emissions as pan-frying a chicken breast on an induction stove. And of course gas generates pollution when you're boiling or steaming things, quickly reheating, or anything that doesn't involve burning / Malliard reactions / etc. Using gas means you are at the very least doubling the amount of pollution, and in most cases it's much worse than that.

On top of all that, ventilation does nothing for the environmental impact: https://concernedhealthny.org/2022/10/burning-fossil-fuel-in...

nullc 2 days ago | parent [-]

> https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6355613

The cited study performed no measurement of gas cooking.

> On top of all that, ventilation does nothing for the environmental impact:

Gas used for cooking is not a meaningful contributor to our overall gas usage.

2 days ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
cute_boi 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I’ve lived in many apartments, and the vents just scatter air randomly i.e. they don't suck air and vent it outside. So getting proper ventilation isn’t really feasible unless you’re willing to open the window every time.

nullc 2 days ago | parent [-]

Right, but gas vs not gas remains irrelevant. You're poisoning yourself w/ cooking in those apartments.

The only fix is proper ventilation. Which is unfortunate, because as you note many apartments and homes are not built for it... even in new construction.

Which might be a useful action point for regulatory intervention, rather than something which is much more performative than useful.

kelipso 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Gas cooking definitely doesn’t affect anyone outside the house lol, much less neighborhood.

AIPedant 3 days ago | parent [-]

Gas extraction and transmission certainly affects people outside the house, so anything to reduce gas consumption is a win. Also, gas burning absolutely affects the entire neighborhood: https://concernedhealthny.org/2022/10/burning-fossil-fuel-in... I could not find the link but the problem is especially acute for people who live near restaurants in NYC. And that comment about how it's cooking food that's the problem, not the fuel, is 100% wrong: https://archive.is/A23eV

This comment and the other reply are just jaw-droppingly naive and ignorant. The indoor air quality while using a gas stove jumps to wildly unhealthy levels. But those pollutants do not just disappear! Much of it is deposited on indoor walls or residents' lungs, but much of it also leaks out of the building. Yes it is true that one teeny widdle stove won't hurt anyone except yourself, but that's why this is a tragedy of the commons that requires government regulation.

justlikereddit 2 days ago | parent [-]

>the problem is especially acute for people who live near restaurants in NYC.

A simile to this is saying electric bikes are dangerous and should be banned because they are motorized transports, and as my neighbor died in a frontal collision between his car and 18 wheeler it's highly irresponsible to let a teenager ride on e-bikes.

Magnitude soup.

jfim 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Gas cooking doesn't really have good temperature control though. Using a temperature probe, I can set my stock pot to 98°C on the induction cooktop and it'll stay exactly there for hours with no worrying about the burner set too high or low for the stock to gently simmer.

There's also no worrying about combustion gases in the house.

harvey9 3 days ago | parent [-]

You described a completely different requirement from the post you replied to. A kitchen could accommodate both by having more than one hob type, or a gas hob and a plug-in dedicated slow cooker gadget.

jordanb 3 days ago | parent [-]

Inconsistent heat is never good for cooking.

harvey9 2 days ago | parent [-]

It is unusual to go into a professional kitchen and not find open flame hobs. I conclude that it is possible to use these to prepare high quality food.

bradlys 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What’re you doing to move the pan all the time? If you’re working with a wok and doing a lot of fast paced work you’d find in a restaurant, I’d understand because induction wok surfaces are hard to come by in the US.

But I don’t get it otherwise. I’m rarely moving the pan so much that induction wouldn’t be usable.

SilverElfin 3 days ago | parent [-]

A number of cooking techniques require it. Basting, flambé, etc. It’s also much easier to change temperature quickly by moving or tilting pans. And you can use a wider range of materials that let you cook food differently.

BobaFloutist 2 days ago | parent [-]

Ok but how routinely do you flambé

archagon 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

FWIW, most high-end restaurants rely on induction these days. (Sometimes, though not always, exclusively.)

_heimdall 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Thanks, this was going to be my main question here.

I haven't been in a commercial kitchen in years, at that time everything was gas. It was obvious that chefs preferred gas over electric, but at that time induction was still too new for commercial use.

latchkey 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh, that sounds interesting, source?

archagon 3 days ago | parent [-]

I don't really have a source, but here's a bit about it: https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2022-1-spring/notes-here-t...

I've seen it first-hand, too. Pastry chefs in particular seem to appreciate the stability and evenness of low heat that high-end induction brings to the table. You can often see Cedric Grolet use an induction burner on his channel, for example: https://www.instagram.com/cedricgrolet/

gajjanag 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

+1 - there are just so many Asian recipes that can not be done anywhere near as easily on induction stovetops (high heat from direct flame for flatbreads, etc).

Plus a whole bunch of cookware doesn't work with induction (clay pots, non ferromagnetic bases, etc). I do wonder if any of these "environmental" estimates factor in the environmental cost of replacing a bunch of cookware just to satisfy induction requirements.

g8oz 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Simply not true. There are induction woks available for East Asian recipies.

South Asian flatbreads like naans, rotis, dosas and parathas can definitely be made well with induction. Plus the precision control of heating opens up new possibilities with all cuisine types.

As for embodied replacement costs - that talking point has been used or rather misused to dismiss everything from solar panels to EVs to wind turbines. Just because there is a payback period doesn't mean that it's insurmountable. What's the payback period on fast fashion and other consumerist nonsense? Infinity right?

gajjanag 3 days ago | parent [-]

I guess you have never worked with a slow induction cooktop. Literally we had to spend 15 minutes more for cooking things on induction compared with our previous apartment's gas connection.

Maybe they are better now but it is certainly not the case that all induction cooktops have these magical properties; many are cheap and skimp on something. While in the 5+ apartments I have been in gas has always delivered the same heating experience that I can rely on.

And to your point about rotis, no - it can not be done unless you get a different, heavier bottomed pan suitable for induction. Exactly what I was saying regarding the replacement costs.

SilverElfin 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yep - a gas ban basically bans major parts of various cultures. But also even for typical recipes, you can’t do things like tilt a pan to use the flame to heat different parts differently.

As for environmental costs - the thing that surprises me is that induction easily warps even higher end pans. But yes you’re right, you can’t use many different materials.

ponector 3 days ago | parent [-]

Gas stove is a modern invention. Culture will be fine with other ways to heat the pan.

SilverElfin 2 days ago | parent [-]

It’s a modern invention that replaces cooking over a flame. Like from wood. Having a flame to cook over is core to many cultures.

ViewTrick1002 2 days ago | parent [-]

Buy a propane torch? Or a tiny single pan portable gas stove? Or just use your gas barbecue? Or use your charcoal fired barbecue?

aeternum 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, liberal used to be about increasing freedom, now it seems to be more about bans and penalties for non-conformers

dietr1ch 3 days ago | parent [-]

I don't see the biggest difference being about freedom, but what to maximise, individual or society as a group.

Individuals excel when there's absolutely no rule stopping them, but enough to not make others a threat, and groups excel when there's rules to prevent individuals from taking an advantage over the rest, be it not paying their fair share on maintaining society, ignoring costs that society pays as a whole.

Here the idea is that natural gas is a greenwashed technology and that society would be better off moving away from it, so through this ban you'll start the migration away from natural gas. The individual standpoint is that natural gas is probably cheaper, so fuck the planet if that gets you a better price.

Are there other things to change if you care about the planet? Sure, but that's not the point and doing only one of them isn't going to make a dent on the upcoming climate catastrophes.

_heimdall 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Not sure why the GP got down voted, you two are saying effectively the same thing.

Liberalism used to be about the individual and individual rights/freedoms. The term has been redefined (at least in the US) to focus on social and collective issues. When you focus on collective issues you inevitably ban things deemed worse for the collective and enforce those bans on anyone who doesn't conform.

_heimdall 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> Are there other things to change if you care about the planet? Sure, but that's not the point and doing only one of them isn't going to make a dent on the upcoming climate catastrophes.

It's really interesting to me that this argument comes up often in environmental issues but is treated like the plague in other areas.

There was a thread a few days ago about the potential defunding of federal weather reporting services. I raised this same basic point, that we must do something about our deficit and even small cuts will help relative to doing nothing.

That landed like a lead balloon, the pain caused by any spending cuts just aren't acceptable to most people, unlike the pains caused by any regulations intended to help the environment.

PretzelPirate 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Being able to use natural gas isn't a valuable public good.

I used to live in an area with regular tornadoes, having public weather data is life saving. People shouldn't have to die from tornadoes because they're poor.

_heimdall 3 days ago | parent [-]

I currently live in an area with regular tornadoes. There's a huge gap between a federally subsidized weather prediction program and making sure people in your community can be alerted.

Most even small towns in my area, the kind with one stop light at best, have community storm shelters. Granted those ultimately are partly subsidized by the federal government, but that is still different than a federal agency program.

To that end, if the concern is tornado safety why doesn't the government give communities or individuals storm shelters for free rather than partially subsidizing them for those who are at least well enough off to throw a few thousand at a small unit?

justinrubek 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can you provide any evidence or reasoning that cutting the weather services would help move the needle on our deficit? Are you sure that not having them won't cause an increase instead, for example if the lack of data causes destruction or worse crop yields? Are the groups advocating for doing this taking steps to reduce the deficit elsewhere, or are they increasing it instead? Do we actually need to address the deficit?

_heimdall a day ago | parent [-]

Cutting spending to any existing program will decrease the deficit relative to where it would be without cutting that spending. I'm not sure what evidence you'd really need there, say the budget is currently $150m and you reduce it to $0 - the deficit decreases by $150m. Given that the government doesn't use a zero-based budget, for better or worse, that decrease extends into all future years as the default otherwise is for that same $150m to be spent every year.

We absolutely do need to address the deficit as well as our debt. Expenses just to service the debt are a large chunk of our annual budget now. Do you know of any example of a country that ran up a debt to GDP (or similar) ratio this high and didn't have meaningful economic issues? Similarly, do you know of any country that debased its own currency through aggressive money printing and didn't end up collapsing, hyper-inflating, or both?

seanmcdirmid a day ago | parent [-]

> say the budget is currently $150m and you reduce it to $0 - the deficit decreases by $150m.

Interest accrued on debt must be added to the deficit as well, unless you are including that in the budget? I'm not sure how defaulting on debt payments would play out though.

The Republicans went nuts when Bill Clinton started reducing debt with a surplus. They thought debt reduction was a really really bad thing. American is actually pretty average in debt/gdp ratio for developed countries, however. Nowhere near as crazy as Japan.

_heimdall 20 hours ago | parent [-]

> Interest accrued on debt must be added to the deficit as well, unless you are including that in the budget?

I'm not quite sure what you mean here. I'm talking only about reducing the deficit, any debt already owed would still be there and interest on it would still be owed. Cutting spending to reduce deficit would just slow down how quickly the debt grows.

> American is actually pretty average in debt/gdp ratio for developed countries, however. Nowhere near as crazy as Japan.

Oh sure, though in my opinion that's a sign of how many countries are in similar debt trouble rather than it being okay.

The US debt to GDP is currently around 124%. Until very recently it was broadly agreed in economics that over 100% was a huge risk and over 120% was effectively a point of no return before you follow in Japan's footsteps.

Those warning sign levels only got moved once the US passed them. Maybe they're right and it isn't actually a problem, but I can say those original levels came with specific historical examples of countries that failed after those levels and today's understanding of what ratios are okay seem to come with vague explanations and hand waving.

myvoiceismypass 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

When the cuts are paired with other things that explode the deficit, it seems pretty meaningless.

_heimdall 3 days ago | parent [-]

With that we totally agree. I take huge issue with any increase in federal spending, and didn't vote for this administration in case that matters here. I wouldn't throw out funding cuts just because we are still spending elsewhere though, that seems like a move that just gets us closer to the edge faster.

Gigachad 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Induction is not rough on pans, it just has a massively higher range of power output. The higher end options should only be used for boiling water. Usually a 6-7 out of 9 on induction is equivalent to full flame gas.

ViewTrick1002 2 days ago | parent [-]

Or if you are deep frying and seeing the temperature drop from adding too much at the same time.

pshirshov 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can. https://www.siemens-home.bsh-group.com/uk/en/mkt-product/coo...

mensetmanusman 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

High power electric stove tops are better than induction. I can cook as well with these as with natural gas. Induction sucks.

Natural gas emits particles we would rather not breath in…

franktankbank 3 days ago | parent [-]

Everyone should have a vent to the outside regardless of stove type. My folks got induction which replaced a top that had a built-in fan vent. Every time they cook its really terrible.