| ▲ | troupo 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> distros should package for themselves. You just distribute your sources. That's how you ended up with Erlang being split into 20+ packages on Ubuntu/Debian in the past. Because it was packaged by people who know little about erlang, and had too much time on their hands probably. And that is the main issue: you want distro maintainers to compile and package every single pieces of software under the sun, but they can't possibly know every piece of software, how it works, or how it's supposed to work. Times that by the number of distros. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | palata 7 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
> you want distro maintainers to compile and package every single pieces of software under the sun No. I want people who will actually use the package to package the software they need, and distro maintainer to supervise that. > Because it was packaged by people who know little about erlang Yep, people who won't use Erlang shouldn't package Erlang. But on the other hand, developers who won't use Erlang on platform X shouldn't package Erlang on platform X. The "we absolutely need flatpak because otherwise it fundamentally doesn't work" philosophy is, to me, very close to saying "we must consolidate everything under one single OS. Everybody should use the exact same thing otherwise it doesn't work". That's not what I want. I want to have freedom, and the cost of it is that I may have to package stuff from time to time. If you don't want to contribute to your distro, choose a super popular distro where everything is already packaged (and used!). Or use macOS. Or use Windows. You don't get to complain about Alpine Linux not having a package you want: you chose Alpine, that was part of the deal. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||