The problem isn't really the ratio, but the use in arbitrary contexts that require a lot of pre-existing knowledge. The reference value is sometimes a rather arbitrary value in an arbitrary unit, neither of which is communicated by the "dB" unit suffix.

The SI way to write `10 dBm` is to write `10 dB (1mW)`, clearly communicating both the power level and the reference point and unit. This ensures that you do not have to just memorize a bunch of decibell suffixes and their magical reference values.

The other side of the authors discussion is the use of 'decibels' to describe 'loudness'. The big difficulty there is that 'loudness' is a sense perception that varies between people and in different contexts. The article touches on this 'weighted to mimic human hearing...' but doesnt mention the systems to do this - DB(A) and others, none of which achieve scientific perfection.

Our senses are all like this - for the same reason we have dozens of systems to describe color. And why perfume and wine makers can never agree descriptions.

That’s maybe what it “is”, but not the only thing people use it for in many fields. Very often, it’s a ratio between a measured quantity and some (implied) base unit of the same quantity.

I understand that and it just reinforces my point. What 1 dB essentially means is highly dependent on a most of the time silent context.

Exactly. I’ve never seen it otherwise.