| ▲ | guerrilla a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
In case anyone else forgot what that means. > The "brown M&M clause" was a specific contract requirement by Van Halen that demanded all brown M&Ms be removed from a bowl of M&Ms provided backstage before their performances. This clause was not a frivolous demand but a way to test if the concert promoters had read the entire contract carefully. If brown M&Ms were found, it indicated that other important technical details might have been overlooked, which could pose safety risks for the band and the audience. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | theshrike79 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
And an additional note: The Van Halen show wasn't a few dudes with guitars and a set of drums going around in a van. It was a massive display of pyrotechnics and staging - the requirements in the rider weren't there for fun, it was for actual safety. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gcanyon a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
There's a further aspect (supposedly): the brown M&Ms was listed in the pre-check conditions, and the contract stated that if any of them were found to not be in compliance then the Van Halen team had the right to force checks on any/all of them for compliance. So if they found the brown M&Ms it gave them the contractual right to demand that other, more impactful, requirements be (re)checked for compliance. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | CPLX a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
You know I’ve seen this explanation a million times for decades and it’s always just a tiny bit wrong. It’s a small distinction, but actually if the band showed up and found all the brown M&Ms still there the plan would have already been a failure. The reason it was in the contract was to make sure the promoter had read the contract before signing it and understood what they were getting into. Band riders are almost invariably redlined. Bands ask for all sorts of crazy shit and you cross out stuff you can’t provide or give a substitute brand name (like if the venue has an exclusive vendor relationship with Coke instead of Pepsi stuff like that) and then you work out any kinks and finalize it. The reason to put the M&M clause in there is to get the promoter to strike the clause during the contracting process because any competent promoter will read every line carefully and strike something like that. So when they do you know they read it and know what they are doing are comfortable signing a deal with them. You would never want to be arriving at the venue with the clause still in force, that’s a sign you have a larger problem. Source: I was a concert promoter in the 90’s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||