| ▲ | TheBlight an hour ago |
| Let's take the flipside of your hypothetical [1]: What if it actually tells them man-made global warming is real but insignificant compared to other forces outside of human control that are acting on global climate? |
|
| ▲ | pron an hour ago | parent [-] |
| Same. The point is that intelligence alone doesn't confer an unlimited power to effect change, and it's pretty easy to see that it doesn't. |
| |
| ▲ | TheBlight 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I guess my point is I bet true ASI would break a lot of shibboleths across all ideological boundaries such that, to your point, all people aren't going to accept it. We'll probably all decide it's wrong or broken. | | |
| ▲ | intrasight 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | >all people aren't going to accept it You don't have to accept it but you will have to live with it. | |
| ▲ | pron 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ok, although I don't think that's likely. It will have access to the same information we have, and so I doubt it will reach too many conclusive results that go against scholarly consensus. | | |
|
|