| ▲ | 0x1ch 2 days ago | |
I'd actually feel pretty safe with a LLM project if spec'd against the protocol documentation as opposed to a rookie's handcoded implementation. If security is the concern, I don't think using random reimplements is very safe to begin with. | ||
| ▲ | jayd16 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is a false choice. You can pick neither and for all you know you're picking both. | ||
| ▲ | Bender 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I'd actually feel pretty safe with a LLM project Same. I had a couple LLM's rewrite, harden an anonymous image board. It's not popular but exposed to the internet and the Tor network. Not worried at all. | ||
| ▲ | rootnod3 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Unless the model changes and messes half the code base on next iteration. Or Anthropic decides to A/B test your agent. Or when shit goes sideways and someone actually needs to take a human look at the BF s. I’d rather have the guy who manually with human eyes read the specs. | ||