Blocking the major points of access is very effective. It has broader chilling effect. LM studio makes it trivial to grab any model on the fly. If folks have to import and set them up themselves they’ll be less likely to.

You don’t have to ban things. You just have to harder to get them than the alternatives.

▲

jack_pp 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

yeah I doubt techies wanting to RE stuff will be deterred by hugginface. I think the opposite effect is true, they'll be motivated to boycott it and find alternatives out of sheer spite.

▲

Forgeties79 12 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes but the number of people who are willing to go to those lengths will diminish with every barrier that goes up. And if the number of people willing to do that drops lower and lower, the effort becomes less and less effective.

Right now we benefit from a massive number of people participating as creators and users. What happens when that slows to a trickle?

Let’s start with the first obvious one: what happens when uncensored/abliterated models are pulled from HF? How many people will just shrug and say “well I guess I don’t use those anymore”? Because previously it was simply download LM studio, search, click on the model you want. The end. Suddenly it is much more difficult

▲

zardo 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It would be harder for a short period of time. Then it will be made easy again. As a baseline, it's not going to get harder than pirating a movie unless it's made criminal.

▲

Forgeties79 4 hours ago | parent [-]

what sense does that make? Why would it suddenly get easier?

▲

zardo 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I didn't say suddenly. Do you think no one would try to develop a replacement?

	▲	Forgeties79 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Please don’t get hung up on my word choice. The point is this: I don’t understand why you think that it’s a given that adoption would occur at a meaningful level. We have it right now. Why would we give that up for the promise that we’ll get to again? It makes no sense. We should not want access to be eroded over time and then cope with “well we’ll get an alternative.” That’s not a given! It’s not going to stop with hugging face just like ID requirements aren’t stopping at pornography. It is much harder to regain these things once they are lost.

▲

jack_pp 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I find it hard to believe people who have hardware that can run LLMs are so easily deterred. The whole point of investing the money is to do whatever you want

▲

Forgeties79 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Everybody with a silicon Mac can easily run a small parameter LLM. Smartphones can run small ones too. Plenty of windows machines are capable too.

We know with populations of a certain size, any barrier is going to cause people to drop off. We see it over and over again. Why is this going to be any different? The more technical it feels, the more impenetrable it feels, so people will simply turn to ChatGPT or anthropic or whoever and pay them a subscription. Is that what we want? Like what are you even arguing with me about?

▲

jack_pp 7 hours ago | parent [-]

this is a thread about reverse engineering, to my knowledge small parameter LLMs are not going to give you much help with this. who cares about novelty LLMs?

> We know with populations of a certain size, any barrier is going to cause people to drop off

but the population size of people who will self host is not large.

> The more technical it feels, the more impenetrable it feels

you have to be inherently technical to even consider the option to run locally no matter how easy. what would a non technical person even use a local LLM for, that they wouldn't want to do with CGPT or ANT?

also, even considering reverse engineering any software at all requires technical knowledge. 99% of lay people don't even know it's an option let alone start vibe coding a RE on a local LLM

	▲	Forgeties79 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		When has lack of domain knowledge stopped people when it comes to LLM’s? Besides I know I often learn how to do things by just throwing myself at it and brute forcing it until I start to gain understanding. A lot of us learn by doing, even if it’s something we have no business doing in the first place. A lot of people also work on projects because they want people to use it. If the number of people utilizing different peoples takes on models drops, than people are going to lose interest in making them for other people. We all like to point to the altruism of the open source world, but nobody likes to release something only for no people to use it. That’s a very natural feeling that leads to people not releasing things because they’re too niche and such. Anyway I’m just moving on. I don’t understand how I’m having to defend “increased barriers to entry dissuades people from participation and creation.” Some of y’all don’t think it’s a big deal or it’s somehow not applicable, but I can’t say I agree

▲

hobofan 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I feel that with AI in the equation the game of Whac-a-mole has shifted significantly into the moles favor. Especially if it relies on moles self-censoring.

▲

Forgeties79 12 hours ago | parent [-]

Go ask 30 people off the street to set up LM studio and get it using tools to search the web (without web access local models are practically useless to the average person beyond summarizing and editing documents so internet access is a must).

Barriers to entry are a thing. Look at Linux or general open source adoption. Convenience is important.

▲

hobofan 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This thread is about making reverse engineering/jailbreaking more accessible. The target audience for that will likely never be laymen. Even if barriers to entry are slightly elevated again, by making it slightly harder to get access to jailbreak-willing LLMs, ultimately the barrier will still be significantly lower than it was a few years ago.

Also, for each device/group of devices, this only has to be done by a single determined person. It's not something that _everyone_ has to be able to do to have a transformative effect.

	▲	Forgeties79 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But right now laymen have easy access to this stuff! That’s what’s amazing about it right? And it’s not like there are two categories in the world, laymen and experts. I am a great example of someone who falls in the middle. I have enough technological knowledge to get myself in trouble and hack away at projects, but I am in no way a coder or engineer. I am the kind of person that gets dropped from the pack when these things tighten up too much. I can survive hugging face not hosting this stuff, but a number of my peers probably would throw up their hands and move on. And I don’t blame them, it gets exhausting fighting every single service in our lives trying to make it work for us. We eventually have to pick and choose. I don’t have time to jailbreak and hack together everything in my life. That’s why I have an iPhone and a more privacy focused/hardened, controlled Linux computer. I don’t get why I’m having to defend my stance against barriers to entry here to be honest! It’s surprising

▲

Windchaser 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Go ask 30 people off the street to set up LM studio and get it using tools to search the web"

They won't need to do that. All they'll need to do is use one of the sites/services set up by folks like you and me, who can set up an LM studio.

▲

Forgeties79 8 hours ago | parent [-]

They will go and pay OpenAI and be done with it

▲

zardo 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Not if OpenAI models refuse to do the thing they want done.

▲

Forgeties79 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s when they turn to (extra) sketchy websites or just throw their hands up and give up.

I just feel like some of you are inadvertently advocating for “only the most determined should be allowed to participate.”

▲

zardo 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah there's that. There's also, ask my nephew that fixes the printer.

	▲	Forgeties79 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		As I said another comment, this all just feels like everyone inadvertently saying “only the most dedicated should be given direct access to these tools.” I wouldn’t be necessarily against that if the alternative wasn’t yet another privacy-violating subscription minefield dominating 99% of the landscape. That’s what that road leads to. Barriers -> Less participation -> less created outside the prescribed corporate play pen -> more people in the play pen.